Cited by 65Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineDeep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The challenge of integrating devices into the central nervous system.

Tresco, Patrick A., Winslow, Brent D.·2011·Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Implanted biomedical devices are playing an increasingly important role in the treatment of central nervous system disorders. While devices such as deep brain stimulation electrodes and drug delivery systems have shown clinical success in chronic applications, other devices such as nerve guidance substrates and recording electrodes that operate over a very short length scale have not had the same kind of clinical impact. By reviewing what is currently known about the brain tissue response to implanted electrodes, the authors propose that the foreign-body response, which changes the tissue structure immediately surrounding implanted devices, may be the reason near-function devices are stalled in preclinical development. The article concludes by reviewing recent efforts to reduce the foreign body response, which shows promise to accelerate the clinical development of this new generation of biomedical devices.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v39.i1.30

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systems have performed well during acute recordings, but failed to function reliably over clinically relevant timelines, the result of brain tissue reaction against implants.

    “Systems have performed well during acute recordings, but failed to function reliably over clinically relevant timelines, the result of brain tissue reaction against implants, making biocompatibility of implanted BCI systems a primary concern in current device design (Polikov et al., 2005; Winslow and Tresco, 2010; Tresco and Winslow, 2011).”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Tresco and Winslow, 2011

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tresco, P. A., & Winslow, B. D.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering
Publisher
Begell House
Published
2011
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
29-44
ISSN
0278-940X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976803735
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
Keywords
foreign body reaction, implanted electrodes, central nervous system, recording electrodes, deep brain stimulation, drug delivery systems, preclinical drug development, chronic implantation
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System, Electrodes, Foreign-Body Reaction, Humans, Neural Prostheses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review