The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concise Review: Wharton's Jelly-Derived Cells Are a Primitive Stromal Cell Population
Open accessAbstract
Here, the literature was reviewed to evaluate whether a population of mesenchymal stromal cells derived from Wharton's jelly cells (WJCs) is a primitive stromal population. A clear case can be made for WJCs as a stromal population since they display the characteristics of MSCs as defined by the International Society for Cellular Therapy; for example, they grow as adherent cells with mesenchymal morphology, they are self-renewing, they express cell surface markers displayed by MSCs, and they may be differentiated into bone, cartilage, adipose, muscle, and neural cells. Like other stromal cells, WJCs support the expansion of other stem cells, such as hematopoietic stem cells, are well-tolerated by the immune system, and they have the ability to home to tumors. In contrast to bone marrow MSCs, WJCs have greater expansion capability, faster growth in vitro, and may synthesize different cytokines. WJCs are therapeutic in several different pre-clinical animal models of human disease such as neurodegenerative disease, cancer, heart disease, etc. The preclinical work suggests that the WJCs are therapeutic via trophic rescue and immune modulation. In summary, WJCs meet the definition of MSCs. Since WJCs expand faster and to a greater extent than adult-derived MSCs, these findings suggest that WJCs are a primitive stromal cell population with therapeutic potential. Further work is needed to determine whether WJCs engraft long-term and display self-renewal and multipotency in vivo and, as such, demonstrate whether Wharton's jelly cells are a true stem cell population. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dominici, M., Le Blanc, K., Mueller, I., Slaper-Cortenbach, I., Marini, F. C., Krause, D. S., Deans, R. J., Keating, A., Prockop, D. J., & Horwitz, E. M. (2006) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1080/14653240600855905 · Cited by 17,766
Kern, S., Eichler, H., Stoeve, J., Klüter, H., & Bieback, K. (2006) · STEM CELLS · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342 · Cited by 3,370
Cited by
Ding, D.-C., Shyu, W.-C., & Lin, S.-Z. (2011) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.3727/096368910x · Cited by 894
Wang, L., Hu, L., Zhou, X., Xiong, Z., Zhang, C., Shehada, H. M. A., Hu, B., Song, J., & Chen, L. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12919-x · Cited by 367
Mesenchymal stem cells: Amazing remedies for bone and cartilage defects
Kangari, P., Talaei-Khozani, T., Razeghian-Jahromi, I., & Razmkhah, M. (2020) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-020-02001-1 · Cited by 286
Teratomas from pluripotent stem cells: A clinical hurdle
Fong, C., Gauthaman, K., & Bongso, A. (2010) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.22775 · Cited by 222
Xin, L., Lin, X., Pan, Y., Zheng, X., Shi, L., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., Gao, C., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.012 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Troyer, D. L., & Weiss, M. L.
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-12-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 591-599
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W1973863581
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concise Review: Wharton's Jelly-Derived Cells Are a Primitive Stromal Cell Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0439
- The paper
- Troyer, D. L., & Weiss, M. L. (2008). Concise Review: Wharton's Jelly-Derived Cells Are a Primitive Stromal Cell Population. Stem Cells. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.