Cited by 43Renal cell carcinoma treatmentStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

BEZ235: When Promising Science Meets Clinical Reality

Open access
Pongas, Georgios, Fojo, Tito·2016·The Oncologist

Abstract

An article in a recent issue of The Oncologist reports the results of a phase I clinical trial of BEZ235 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The study was terminated early due to toxicity and a lack of clinical efficacy. The rapid and concise publication of this type of clinical result is necessary for effective collaboration and, ultimately, better outcomes for cancer patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0243

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Severe toxicity occurred when MEK and PI3K inhibitors were used for treatment in patients with RAS and PIK3CA-mutated CRC.

    “However, a previous report uncovered severe toxicity when MEK and PI3K inhibitors were used for treatment in patients with RAS and PIK3CA-mutated CRC37.”

    From Mechanisms of KRAS inhibitor resistance in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer harboring Her2 amplification and aberrant KRAS localization (2025) · cites this paper as [37]

    The paper’s Abstract reports grade 3–4 adverse effects with the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in patients with renal cell carcinoma, and poor tolerability in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. It does not report toxicity from combined MEK and PI3K inhibitors in patients with RAS- and PIK3CA-mutated colorectal cancer. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pongas, G., & Fojo, T.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Fojo, Tito
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2016-08-26
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
1033-1034
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W2514843686
Cited by
43
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
BEZ235, renal cell carcinoma, early trial termination, drug toxicity, clinical efficacy, translational research, anticancer drug development
MeSH terms
Humans, Imidazoles, Quinolines, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review