Cited by 3,019Renal cell carcinoma treatmentBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial

Motzer, Robert J, Escudier, Bernard, Oudard, Stéphane, Hutson, Thomas E, Porta, Camillo, Bracarda, Sergio, Grünwald, Viktor, Thompson, John A +7 more·2008·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Everolimus (RAD001) is an orally administered inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a therapeutic target for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We did a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma whose disease had progressed on vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy.Methods Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma which had progressed on sunitinib, sorafenib, or both, were randomly assigned in a two to one ratio to receive everolimus 10 mg once daily (n=272) or placebo (n=138), in conjunction with best supportive care. Randomisation was done centrally via an interactive voice response system using a validated computer system, and was stratified by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic score and previous anticancer therapy, with a permuted block size of six. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, assessed via a blinded, independent central review. The study was designed to be terminated after 290 events of progression. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00410124.Findings All randomised patients were included in efficacy analyses. The results of the second interim analysis indicated a significant difference in efficacy between arms and the trial was thus halted early after 191 progression events had been observed (101 [37%] events in the everolimus group, 90 [65%] in the placebo group; hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.22-0.40, p<0.0001; median progression-free survival 4.0 [95% CI 3.7-5.5] vs 1.9 [1.8-1.9] months). Stomatitis (107 [40%] patients in the everolimus group vs 11 [8%] in the placebo group), rash (66 [25%] vs six [4%]), and fatigue (53 [20%] vs 22 [16%]) were the most commonly reported adverse events, but were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Pneumonitis (any grade) was detected in 22 (8%) patients in the everolimus group, of whom eight had pneumonitis of grade 3 severity.Interpretation Treatment with everolimus prolongs progression-free survival relative to placebo in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma that had progressed on other targeted therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61039-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mTOR inhibitor everolimus can prolong progression-free survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma by inhibiting mTOR's promotion of HIF-1.

    “The mTOR inhibitor everolimus, which has been tested in phase III clinical trials, can prolong the progression‐free survival of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma by inhibiting the promotion of HIF‐1 by mTOR.”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motzer, R. J., Escudier, B., Oudard, S., Hutson, T. E., Porta, C., Bracarda, S., Grünwald, V., Thompson, J. A., Figlin, R. A., Hollaender, N., Urbanowitz, G., Berg, W. J., Kay, A., Lebwohl, D., & Ravaud, A.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (US)
  • City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Motzer, Robert J
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
372
Issue
9637
Pages
449-456
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2118677643
Cited by
3,019
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 177 · 2016: 211 · 2015: 233 · 2014: 240 · 2013: 295 · 2012: 254
FWCI
239.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novartis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
everolimus, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, mTOR inhibitors, progression-free survival, sunitinib, sorafenib, anti-VEGF therapy, pneumonitis, stomatitis, adverse events, best supportive care, early trial termination, oral anticancer therapy, survival after nephrectomy
MeSH terms
Everolimus, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Kidney Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Karnofsky Performance Status, Disease-Free Survival, Sirolimus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review