Cited by 442PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

mTOR Kinase Inhibition Causes Feedback-Dependent Biphasic Regulation of AKT Signaling

Open access
Rodrik-Outmezguine, Vanessa S., Chandarlapaty, Sarat, Pagano, Nen C., Poulikakos, Poulikos I., Scaltriti, Maurizio, Moskatel, Elizabeth, Baselga, José, Guichard, Sylvie +1 more·2011·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

mTOR kinase inhibitors block mTORC1 and mTORC2 and thus do not cause the mTORC2 activation of AKT observed with rapamycin. We now show, however, that these drugs have a biphasic effect on AKT. Inhibition of mTORC2 leads to AKT serine 473 (S473) dephosphorylation and a rapid but transient inhibition of AKT T308 phosphorylation and AKT signaling. However, inhibition of mTOR kinase also relieves feedback inhibition of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), leading to subsequent phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation and rephosphorylation of AKT T308 sufficient to reactivate AKT activity and signaling. Thus, catalytic inhibition of mTOR kinase leads to a new steady state characterized by profound suppression of mTORC1 and accumulation of activated AKT phosphorylated on T308, but not S473. Combined inhibition of mTOR kinase and the induced RTKs fully abolishes AKT signaling and results in substantial cell death and tumor regression in vivo. These findings reveal the adaptive capabilities of oncogenic signaling networks and the limitations of monotherapy for inhibiting feedback-regulated pathways. Significance: The results of this study show the adaptive capabilities of oncogenic signaling networks, as AKT signaling becomes reactivated through a feedback-induced AKT species phosphorylated on T308 but lacking S473. The addition of RTK inhibitors can prevent this reactivation of AKT signaling and cause profound cell death and tumor regression in vivo, highlighting the possible need for combinatorial approaches to block feedback-regulated pathways. Cancer Discovery; 1(3); 248–59. © 2011 AACR. Read the Commentary on this article by Keniry and Parsons, p. 203 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 189

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0085

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodrik-Outmezguine, V. S., Chandarlapaty, S., Pagano, N. C., Poulikakos, P. I., Scaltriti, M., Moskatel, E., Baselga, J., Guichard, S., & Rosen, N.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Program in Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry and 2Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; 3Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 4AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, United Kingdom
Corresponding author
Rosen, Neal
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
248-259
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W1965626427
Cited by
442
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08ca134833-02)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA094060, K08-CA134833, P50CA086438, T32CA062948, P50CA092629)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
Akt signaling, mTORC1, mTORC2, feedback regulation, receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, adaptive resistance, combination therapy, tumor regression, cell death
MeSH terms
Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Animals, Female, Humans, Mice, Nude, Morpholines, Phosphorylation, Proteins, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Cell Death, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Multiprotein Complexes, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Mice, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review