Cited by 41Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Immune-Related Adverse Events and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer with Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications for Immunotherapy

Open access
Das, Satya, Ciombor, Kristen K., Haraldsdottir, Sigurdis, Pumpalova, Yoanna, Sahin, Ibrahim H., Pineda, G., Shyr, Yu, Lin, E.P. +8 more·2020·The Oncologist

Abstract

Introduction: Immune-related adverse event (IRAE) onset may represent a clinical biomarker for anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody response based on emerging evidence from patients with various advanced malignancies. This phenomenon has not been previously reported in a multidisease cohort of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications to receive immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Materials and Methods: The study was a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of 76 patients with GI cancer who had received anti-PD-1 antibodies for FDA-approved indications. The primary and secondary outcomes of the study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients based upon IRAE presence, respectively. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; a Cox proportional-hazards model adjusted for IRAE onset, patient age, and enrolling institution was used to analyze outcomes. Results: Median PFS and OS were prolonged in patients who experienced IRAEs compared with those who did not experience them (PFS: not reached [NR] vs. 3.9 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05–0.3, p < .001]; OS: NR vs. 7.4 months [HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03–0.36, p < .001]). Among patients who experienced IRAEs, there were no significant differences in PFS and OS by either initial IRAE severity, management, or time to onset. Conclusion: Patients with gastrointestinal cancer who experienced IRAEs while on anti-PD-1 antibodies demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and OS compared with their counterparts who did not develop IRAEs. Although these findings add to results from studies in other tumor types, larger prospective studies are needed prior to clinical adoption of IRAE onset as a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor response. Implications for Practice: Predictive clinical biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor response have been understudied in the field of immuno-oncology. Immune-related adverse event onset appears to be one such biomarker. Across tumor types, immune-related adverse event onset has been associated with response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies. The results of this study demonstrate this for the first time in patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving anti-PD-1 antibodies. Before immune-related adverse event onset can be adopted clinically as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor response, however, larger prospective studies are needed to better understand the nuances between immune-related adverse event characteristics (severity, site, management, timing of onset) and immune checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0637

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, S., Ciombor, K. K., Haraldsdottir, S., Pumpalova, Y., Sahin, I. H., Pineda, G., Shyr, Y., Lin, E. P., Hsu, C.-Y., Chu, S.-K., Goff, L. W., Cardin, D. B., Bilen, M. A., Fisher, G. A., Wu, C., & Berlin, J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Divisions of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Das, Satya
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2020-01-14
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
669-679
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W3004284786
Cited by
41
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
VCORCDP (5 K12 CA90625-19)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
immune-related adverse events, immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-PD-1, gastrointestinal cancer, predictive biomarkers, immune checkpoint inhibitor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, immunotherapy response biomarkers
MeSH terms
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Humans, Immunotherapy, Prospective Studies, Retrospective Studies, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review