Cited by 24Effects of Radiation ExposureRadiation Therapy and DosimetrySpaceflight effects on biology

Acute biological effects of simulating the whole-body radiation dose distribution from a solar particle event using a porcine model

Open access
Wilson, Jolaine M., Sanzari, Jenine K., Diffenderfer, Eric S., Yee, Stephanie S., Seykora, John T., Maks, Casey, Ware, Jeffrey H., Litt, Harold I. +5 more·2011·Radiation Research

Abstract

In a solar particle event (SPE), an unshielded astronaut would receive proton radiation with an energy profile that produces a highly inhomogeneous dose distribution (skin receiving a greater dose than internal organs). The novel concept of using megavoltage electron-beam radiation to more accurately reproduce both the total dose and the dose distribution of SPE protons and make meaningful RBE comparisons between protons and conventional radiation has been described previously. Here, Yucatan minipigs were used to determine the effects of a superficial, SPE-like proton dose distribution using megavoltage electrons. In these experiments, dose-dependent increases in skin pigmentation, ulceration, keratinocyte necrosis and pigment incontinence were observed. Five of 18 animals (one each exposed to 7.5 Gy and 12.5 Gy radiation and three exposed to 25 Gy radiation) developed symptomatic, radiation-associated pneumonopathy approximately 90 days postirradiation. The three animals from the highest dose group showed evidence of mycoplasmal pneumonia along with radiation pneumonitis. Moreover, delayed-type hypersensitivity was found to be altered, suggesting that superficial irradiation of the skin with ionizing radiation might cause immune dysfunction or dysregulation. In conclusion, using total doses, patterns of dose distribution, and dose rates that are compatible with potential astronaut exposure to SPE radiation, animals experienced significant toxicities that were qualitatively different from toxicities previously reported in pigs for homogeneously delivered radiation at similar doses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/rr2541.1

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the mini-pig, high doses of SPE-like radiation resulted in adverse effects to the skin, as well as to deeper organs and tissues (e.g., decrease in circulating blood cells, lung damage and impaired heart function).

    “In the mini-pig, it was demonstrated that high doses of SPE-like radiation resulted in adverse effects to the skin, as well as to deeper organs and tissues (e.g., decrease in circulating blood cells [63], lung damage [63] and impaired heart function [64]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, J. M., Sanzari, J. K., Diffenderfer, E. S., Yee, S. S., Seykora, J. T., Maks, C., Ware, J. H., Litt, H. I., Reetz, J. A., McDonough, J., Weissman, D., Kennedy, A. R., & Cengel, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Cengel, Keith A.
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2011-11
Volume
176
Issue
5
Pages
649-659
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W2123829933
Cited by
24
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009677)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P30AR057217)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
solar energetic particle events, proton radiation, megavoltage electron beams, dose distribution, radiation dermatitis, radiation pneumonitis, mycoplasmal pneumonia, delayed-type hypersensitivity, immune dysfunction, radiation dose rate, astronaut radiation exposure
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Electrons, Immunologic Tests, Leukocytes, Radiometry, Skin, Space Flight, Swine, Whole-Body Irradiation, Astronauts, Solar Activity, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review