The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 143 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The endocrinology of sexual arousal
Open accessAbstract
The relevance of testosterone, oestradiol and certain peptides (oxytocin (OT), beta-endorphin and prolactin (PRL)) to sexual arousal in humans is reviewed. In addition to behavioural studies, evidence of distribution of gonadal steroid receptors in the brain and the limited evidence from brain imaging are also considered. Testosterone plays a key role in the adult male, with clear, consistent evidence from studies of hypogonadal and eugonadal men. The roles of testosterone in the development of sexual arousability, and in the aging male, are less clear. The relevance of aromatization and of non-sexual effects of testosterone which might indirectly influence sexual arousal are not well understood. Testosterone in the female presents a more complex, less consistent picture. One possible explanation is a much greater variability across women in responsiveness to testosterone. A 'desensitization hypothesis' to account for the striking gender differences is offered. There is limited evidence of a direct effect of oestradiol on sexual arousability in women. The extent to which testosterone in women acts by conversion to oestradiol or by increase of free oestradiol is not yet clear. The role of peptides in sexual arousal remains uncertain, partly because of the multiple roles and sites of action of most peptides. OT and beta-endorphin appear to have both excitatory and inhibitory effects. PRL has been proposed as an inhibitory factor via direct inhibition of dopaminergic activity, but the evidence for this is inconclusive. Whereas the traditional concept of 'hormone' continues to apply to the role of testosterone and oestradiol in sexual arousal, peptides present a more complex role.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
78 Own interpretation · 73 No full text of the sources · 32 No basis given · 29 Sources not found · 12 Not checked yet · 2 Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Mood was significantly improved with the higher testosterone dose for ratings of both depression and 'positive well-being'.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Shifren et al. (2000) source
The results text accompanying Tables 3 and 4 reports that the 300 µg/day dose significantly improved both positive well-being and depressed mood compared with placebo (P=0.04 and P=0.03, respectively). This matches the claim about the higher dose. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Testosterone plays a key role in the adult male, with clear, consistent evidence from studies of hypogonadal and eugonadal men.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Early studies were based on the maximum change in penile circumference as a measure of erectile response; they found little difference between hypogonadal men with and without testosterone replacement.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is limited evidence of a direct effect of oestradiol on sexual arousability in women.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“consistent with testosterone being necessary for normal levels of sexual interest (and arousability).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This suggested that the plasma level of testosterone needed to avoid the sexual effects of testosterone withdrawal was substantially lower than the pre-treatment baseline level.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bagatell et al. (1994a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Such studies consistently show a reduction in the level of sexual interest during testosterone withdrawal, usually evident within 3 to 4 weeks”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bancroft 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Testosterone in the female presents a more complex, less consistent picture.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is consistent with most men having more circulating testosterone than they need for the maintenance of normal sexual function.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PRL has been proposed as an inhibitory factor via direct inhibition of dopaminergic activity, but the evidence for this is inconclusive.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 88
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Probably not a substantial claim. 45
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There was a substantial placebo response; however, there was significantly more improvement with the higher testosterone dose than with placebo on measures of frequency of sexual activity, and pleasure/orgasm, though not for sexual desire or arousal (the opposite pattern reported by Sherwin et al. 1985).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Shifren et al. (2000) source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Supported
In the paper
“The l.c. has testosterone receptors (Parmeggiana & Morrison 1990), and this putative 'excitatory tone' can be regarded as testosterone dependent.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Parmeggiana & Morrison 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Without testosterone, the erectile response was 'stimulus bound', i.e. would recede as soon as the stimulus was switched off.With testosterone replacement, the response would not only show greater rigidity, but would also last beyond the sexual stimulus (Carani et al. 1995).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Carani et al. 1995 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A number of age-related changes may be relevant: altered negative feedback of testosterone and hence less increase in luteinizing hormone (LH) with falling testosterone levels, increased sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and hence relatively reduced free testosterone and the likelihood of an agerelated decline in testosterone receptor sensitivity.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bagatell et al. (1994b) and Yates et al. (1999), in eugonadal men, found no effects of increasing testosterone on frequency of sexual activity, or in the latter study, daily measures of sexual interest.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bagatell et al. (1994b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Yates et al. (1999) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effects on sexual activity with a partner are less consistent, partly because they depend on partner and relationship characteristics.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They found no difference in sexual activity, sexual interest or NPT, although the rigidity of NPT was not measured.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Buena et al. (1993) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Typically, in male studies of this kind, placebo has only a modest effect, but testosterone replacement restores sexual interest and arousability.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas the traditional concept of 'hormone' continues to apply to the role of testosterone and oestradiol in sexual arousal, peptides present a more complex role.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NPT is clearly impaired in hypogonadal men, and restored to normal with testosterone replacement.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The role of peptides in sexual arousal remains uncertain, partly because of the multiple roles and sites of action of most peptides.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The relevance of aromatization and of non-sexual effects of testosterone which might indirectly influence sexual arousal are not well understood.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The extent to which testosterone in women acts by conversion to oestradiol or by increase of free oestradiol is not yet clear.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If testosterone withdrawal lasts long enough, seminal emission will eventually be impaired.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One possible explanation is a much greater variability across women in responsiveness to testosterone.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the first (Udry et al. 1985), a cross-sectional study, the free testosterone index was found to be a strong predictor of 'sexual motivation', whereas stage of pubertal development was not predictive.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Udry et al. 1985 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Anderson et al. (1992), using weekly injections of either placebo or testosterone enanthate (200 mg) over 8 weeks, found no effect of the exogenous testosterone on sexual activity, either with a partner or as masturbation, but a significant increase in a measure of sexual interest independent of sexual interaction with the partner.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anderson et al. (1992) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The roles of testosterone in the development of sexual arousability, and in the aging male, are less clear.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One possible explanation for this apparent contradiction is that the impact of testosterone on sexual arousability (and hence behaviour) has to go through stages of development, which may involve changes in receptor numbers or sensitivity, a process which will also be influenced by individual differences in receptor sensitivity.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Frequency of masturbation tends to follow the level of sexual interest, although cultural factors may influence this pattern of sexual expression (Anderson et al. 1999).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anderson et al. 1999 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Intramuscular testosterone enanthate had no effect on sleep parameters, and did not affect frequency, degree or duration of NPT, when assessed as penile circumference, but did increase, modestly but significantly, penile rigidity during NPT.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Gonadal steroids
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Carani et al. (1995) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reduction in sexual interest and enjoyment is common during the post-partum period, and is more marked in breast-feeding than bottle-feeding mothers (Alder & Bancroft 1988, Hyde & DeLamater 2000).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Alder & Bancroft 1988 source
- Not matchedcites Hyde & DeLamater 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding needs to be replicated.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Ovarian androgens start to decline a few years before the menopause, probably due to a reduction in the mid-cycle rise of testosterone (Roger et al. 1980, Zumoff et al. 1995, Mushayandebvu et al. 1996).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The role of testosterone in the emerging sexual arousability of the peri-pubertal male is not well understood.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Conclusions about the role of testosterone in the male
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may result from the greater complexity of the reproductive endocrine system in women, who experience menstrual cycles, pregnancy and lactation and a clearly identifiable menopause.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Androgens in the female
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Androgen production by the interstitial cells of the post-menopausal ovary is an important source of oestrogen from peripheral conversion.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given this pattern, if testosterone is important for sexual arousability in women, we should expect to find related temporal patterns of arousability through the cycle.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the older male, the picture is complicated by various aging effects, including altered hypothalamo-pituitary feedback, increased testosterone binding and reduced receptor sensitivity.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Conclusions about the role of testosterone in the male
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, once a woman settles into a pattern of regular ovulatory cycles, testosterone levels typically rise during the follicular phase and are at a maximum approximately for the middle third of the cycle, declining during the final third to reach a nadir during the first few days of the next follicular phase.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Appelt & Strauss (1986) studied 36 women who had not had sexual problems before starting on CPA, and of these 16 (44%) reported negative effects on their sex life; this rises to 61% if women not in sexual relationships are excluded.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Appelt & Strauss (1986)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainn = 36- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To adequately test the androgenbehaviour relationship during the mid-life period, longitudinal studies are needed in which the baseline testosterone levels are assessed before the pre-menopausal decline.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence points mainly to the effects of testosterone on central arousal mechanisms; the peripheral effects of testosterone in the human male, relevant to sexual arousal, are as yet unclear.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Conclusions about the role of testosterone in the male
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is also apparent that, in adult eugonadal men, the levels of testosterone in the circulation are substantially higher than required to maintain sexual arousability, suggesting that other effects of testosterone, most probably in the periphery, require higher levels than are needed in the central nervous system (CNS).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Conclusions about the role of testosterone in the male
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So far it has been difficult to predict which cases of ED are likely to benefit from testosterone, although low baseline levels of testosterone certainly increase the likelihood.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Clinical studies -relevance of testosterone to low sexual desire and erectile dysfunction (ED)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This mid-to late-follicular pattern is compatible with an effect of the rising testosterone during the follicular phase, although one might have expected a continuation of this testosterone effect into the first part of the luteal phase.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas in pre-menopausal women, gonadotrophic stimulation of the interstitial cells is regulated by the negative feedback of ovarian steroids, the rise in LH that accompanies the menopausal transition, resulting from the reduction in oestrogen-induced negative feedback, may stimulate the interstitial cells to produce testosterone and androstenedione, sometimes excessively.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a lack of evidence of testosterone levels during the early cycles of post-menarcheal adolescents, which tend to be irregular and not predictably ovulatory.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Graham et al. (1995), in a placebocontrolled study of women who had been sterilized or whose partners had been sterilized, found that a substantial minority of women on the combined OC reported a decline in sexual interest and enjoyment, an effect not observed with a low-dose progestagen only method.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Graham et al. (1995) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two principle mechanisms are involved: the mid-cycle rise in testosterone is blocked by suppression of ovulation and the associated pattern of gonadal steroid change and the combined OC increases SHBG levels and hence reduces the free testosterone available.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Testosterone starts at a lower level in the infant girl, and effectively doubles through pubertal maturation, compared with an 18-fold increase in testosterone for boys.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Androgens in the female
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But these inconsistent findings, involving studies with relatively small numbers of participants, could result from substantial individual variability in testosterone/behaviour relationships.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“As with their studies on adolescent boys, they found discrepant results between their cross-sectional study of eighth to tenth grade girls (approximately 13-15 years of age), where they found a relation between testosterone levels and measures of sexual interest and masturbation, but not with the likelihood of having experienced sexual intercourse”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Androgens in the female
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Udry et al. (1986) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With surgical removal of the ovaries there is an immediate and substantial drop in circulating androgens.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both of these studies, lowered testosterone levels could be the explanation.As yet, however, we have no direct evidence of the relation between testosterone levels and sexual interest.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this does not necessarily mean that sexual arousability is at its lowest at that stage; there are a number of other non-hormonal explanations for the drop in sexual activity during menstruation.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > The menstrual cycle
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Approximately 50% of women came into this category, which suggests that around 50% of women can undergo this depletion of ovarian steroids and not experience loss of sexual interest.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nathorst-Böös et al. (1993) source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There is little evidence, however, that DHEA is directly relevant to sexuality in either men or women, whereas it may be relevant to well-being and energy, and hence secondarily to sexual arousability (Cawood & Bancroft 1996).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cawood & Bancroft 1996 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They concluded that testosterone acts through signalling pathways that differ either in specific brain areas, or within different cells from the same area.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Roselli et al. (2001) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, testosterone activity was thought to be mediated by androgen receptors in the lateral septal, pre-mamillary and intercalated mamillary nuclei.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Michael et al. (1989) source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“They found 5 -reductase activity to be fairly evenly distributed in the brain, whereas, in contrast, aromatase activity was much more localized.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Michael et al. (1989) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Androstenedione has a substantial capacity for conversion to both oestradiol and testosterone; dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has a very limited capacity for conversion to testosterone.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Although Carney et al. (1978) found some benefit of testosterone when combined with counselling for couples whose main problem was sexual unresponsiveness of the woman, other comparable studies failed to replicate this effect (Mathews et al. 1983, Dow & Gallasher 1989).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a placebo-controlled study of women with adrenal insufficiency, the addition of DHEA to the corticosteroid replacement improved measures of sexual interest and responsiveness as well as mood and general well-being, although the effects on mood were more substantial (Arlt et al. 1999).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Arlt et al. 1999 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a more experimental study, Tuiten et al. (1996) studied eight young amenorrhoeic women with low weight, although none had the diagnosis of anorexia nervosa.They showed lower levels of sexual interest and activity, and lower testosterone levels than a comparison group of normally menstruating aged-matched women.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tuiten et al. (1996) source
plaincorrelationaln = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whereas there is evidence that testosterone withdrawal and/or replacement can have effects on women's sexuality, the evidence is inconsistent and sometimes contradictory.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a placebo-controlled evaluation of DHEA administration to women between 40 and 70 years (Morales et al. 1994b), there was significant improvement in a somewhat crude measure of well-being, but no effect on 'libido'.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Morales et al. 1994b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Research on the site of action of testosterone in the non-human primate brain has been ongoing for more than 30 years, during which time there have been major changes in the technologies used, and these have to be kept in mind when comparing findings across studies.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this effect was not reflected in subjective ratings of arousal.Nor did the two treatments differ in terms of daily ratings of sexuality or mood.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tuiten et al. (1996) source
plainn = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For both non-human primates and humans, the majority of evidence is from males.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This experiment therefore demonstrated an effect of increasing testosterone on physiological response to erotic stimulation, which was not apparent in any subjective or mood measures.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
boosteddirectn = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is the only study in which testosterone administration on its own has been evaluated.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Functional brain imaging promises to throw considerable light on brain activity related to sexual function, but is still at an early stage of development, with methodological inconsistencies across studies making interpretation of the findings more difficult (Sumich et al. 2003, Mouras & Stoleru 2005).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sumich et al. 2003 source
- Not matchedcites Mouras & Stoleru 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Roselli & Klosterman (1998) concluded from their findings that this male pattern of aromatization in the rat is established perinatally, and probably forms a fundamental component of masculinization.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Roselli & Klosterman (1998) source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, whereas testosterone may play a role in the sexuality of many women, its effects can easily be obscured by the co-existence of other psychological or affective factors.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“VPA was significantly greater in response to film in the testosterone-treated condition.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Effects of anti-androgens
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tuiten et al. (1996) source
plaindirectn = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Finley & Kritzer (1999), reporting the presence of androgen receptor protein in the pre-frontal cortex of rhesus monkeys, found no differences between their male and female monkeys in this respect.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Finley & Kritzer (1999)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although peptides are released in many different parts of the body, neuropeptides are produced in substantial amounts within the CNS.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“As yet we have few directly relevant data on the speed of action of androgens in the human, although one study in women, discussed earlier (Tuiten et al. 2000), showed an effect on genital response within 3 to 4 h.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Mode of action of androgens and oestrogens in the brain
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tuiten et al. 2000 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mas et al. (1995) concluded that DA blockade was also involved and, because of the interaction between dopaminergic, serotonergic and norepinephric mechanisms, could be the key factor.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Mas et al. (1995)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Both compounds reduced sexual interest, masturbatory activity and erectile response to erotic fantasies and slides producing a pattern very similar to that found in hypogonadal men.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bancroft et al. (1974) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, whether oestradiol has a direct effect on sexual interest and arousability remains unclear.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Oestrogens and female sexuality
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“A dual dose-related effect was observed in women masturbating to orgasm (Gillman & Lichtigfield 1983); low doses of naloxone enhanced pleasure during orgasm, while higher doses had the opposite effect, reducing sexual arousal as well as orgasmic pleasure.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Gillman & Lichtigfield 1983 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The sexual inhibiting effects of -endorphin, and related opiate peptides, are believed to occur mainly through their action on the pre-optic area and the amygdala, the precise inhibiting effect depending on the site of infusion.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Carmichael et al. (1987) found that plasma OT increased around the time of orgasm in men and women, remaining raised for at least 5 min after orgasm.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Carmichael et al. (1987) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In women, a substantial proportion of androgen production is from the adrenal glands and hence increased adrenal androgens can be expected in states associated with increased adrenal activity, such as anxiety, stress or depression (e.g.Weber et al. 2000).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Mode of action of androgens and oestrogens in the brain
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Weber et al. 2000 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These apparently consistent recent results have led these researchers to postulate that the post-orgasmic rise in PRL acts as a feedback control of sexual drive, contributing to the post-orgasmic refractory period (Kruger et al. 2002).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kruger et al. 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Yohimbine on its own produced no observable effect, whereas naloxone produced partial erection in three of the six men studied.The combination of the two drugs, however, produced a full and prolonged erection in all of the six men.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Charney & Heninger (1986) source
plaindirectn = 6- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is consistent evidence of the importance of oestradiol for normal vaginal lubrication.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Oestrogens and female sexuality
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lorrain et al. (1997) showed in male rats that, during the post-ejaculatory interval, serotonin increased in the lateral hypothalamic area.Injecting a serotonin reuptake inhibitor into the lateral hypothalamus produced behavioural effects similar to the post-ejaculatory interval.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lorrain et al. (1997) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, so far the animal evidence is consistent with both a peripheral and central role for OT; the most obvious peripheral effect being facilitation of smooth muscle contraction -the central role being more as a neuromodulator in a variety of response systems.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“OT knockout mice show clear impairment of milk let-down, but no apparent impairment of either mating or parturition (Nishimori et al. 1996, Young et al. 1996).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nishimori et al. 1996 source
- Not matchedcites Young et al. 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence is more consistent for the male than for the female.Apart from methodological considerations, which are more complex in women than in men, potentially the most important factor accounting for this gender difference is a greater variability of behavioural responsiveness to androgens among women.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Mode of action of androgens and oestrogens in the brain
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“widespread awareness of the negative effects of exogenous opiates, such as morphine and heroin, on the sexuality of male and female drug addicts, reducing sexual interest, impairing genital response and blocking ejaculation and orgasm, with active and spontaneous reversal of such effects often occurring during opiate withdrawal (for review see Pfaus & Gorzalka 1987).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pfaus & Gorzalka 1987 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The evidence from chronic exposure, typically implemented by means of transplants of pituitary glands, indicates that after a week or longer there is predictable impairment of sexual response with increased intromission and ejaculation latencies, and reduction in reflexive erections in male rats (Meisel & Sachs 1994).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Meisel & Sachs 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“They concluded that norepinephric (NE), serotonergic and opiate mechanisms were all involved, but with the NE system playing a key role.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Rodriguez-Manzo & Fernando-Guasti (1994, 1995)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The picture is complicated by the fact that opiates inhibit LH-releasing hormone, and hence reduce LH and testosterone.However, the animal evidence shows that the sexually inhibiting effects are predominantly independent of this reduction of testosterone.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although hyperprolactinaemia is also commonly associated with testosterone deficiency in men and ovarian dysfunction in women, impaired sexual desire can occur in hyperprolactinaemia without obvious gonadal steroid deficiency.This has focused attention on the negative sexual effects of PRL.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More than 90% of testosterone in the male is produced by the testes.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Mode of action of androgens and oestrogens in the brain
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It remains a possibility that androgens may produce a relatively rapid membranemediated effect by means of aromatization.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Mode of action of androgens and oestrogens in the brain
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In animal studies, centrally administered OT has induced erection, an effect which is apparently testosterone dependent, and OT receptor antagonists can prevent non-contact erections, considered an index of sexual arousal (Argiolas 1999).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Argiolas 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether the increase of OT around orgasm, which has been somewhat inconsistently observed in the human literature, has any specific function, rather than being an epiphenomenon of other changes, remains uncertain”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The limbic system is characterized by peptidergic neurotransmission, contrasting with the synaptic neuronal structure of the cortex (Herbert 1993)”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Herbert 1993 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the human, low sexual desire is a common symptom of hyperprolactinaemia, often associated, in men, with erectile problems (Franks & Jacobs 1983).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Franks & Jacobs 1983 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in a recent series of studies in which masturbation or sexual activity with a partner led to orgasm or ejaculation, a clear increase in PRL was observed following orgasm in both men (Kruger et al. 1998(Kruger et al. , 2003a) ) and women (Exton et al. 1999), with levels still raised after 60 min.This pattern was not found in a parallel study of men who masturbated without ejaculating (Kruger et al.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“although CPA substantially reduced total testosterone, with no change in SHBG, EE substantially increased both total testosterone and SHBG (Murray et al. 1975).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Murray et al. 1975 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the male, the evidence points to a threshold, below the normal physiological range, above which increased testosterone levels have little behavioural effect, and below which signs of androgen deficiency are likely to occur.This threshold concept does not appear to apply to women.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Mode of action of androgens and oestrogens in the brain
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Whereas in other species, the role of oestradiol in mediating many of the central nervous system effects of testosterone on male sexual behaviour is well established (Lindzey & Korach 2003), its role in human male sexuality remains unclear”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Lindzey & Korach 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PRL is secreted by the anterior pituitary into the general circulation, showing a diurnal episodic pattern, maximal during sleep.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The conventional view is that androgens act in the brain via genomic effects (Rommerts 1990).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Mode of action of androgens and oestrogens in the brain
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Rommerts 1990 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with the possibility that exogenous and endogenous sources of oestradiol have fundamentally different effects, particularly when the endogenous oestradiol results from aromatization of testosterone within the brain.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is generally accepted that OT plays a key role during lactation, facilitating the milk ejection reflex.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Gooren (1985) found that, in eugonadal men, the oestrogen receptor antagonist, tamoxifen, and the aromatase inhibitor, testolactone, had no adverse sexual effects, and that dihydrotestosterone (DHT) was as effective as testosterone in maintaining sexuality in hypogonadal men.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Summary of androgen effects in women
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Gooren (1985) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Attention is also being paid to a related phenomenon, 'sexual satiety' which, in male rats, occurs after a series of unrestricted access to receptive females.This state of sexual unresponsiveness develops, on average, after seven copulations and return to normal responsiveness takes around 15 days.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Wallen & Parsons (1998) have strongly advocated that the sexual effects of testosterone in women result from the consequent increase in free oestradiol, supporting this conclusion with experimental data from rhesus monkeys.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Oestrogens and female sexuality
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wallen & Parsons (1998)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DA in the tubero-infundibular dopaminergic system maintains inhibitory control of PRL release.Thus any reduction of DA activity in this system will result in increased PRL release.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In humans, the refractory period is more substantial in the male than the female.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Peptides
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This reflects in part the widespread interaction between peptides and other neuro-mediators, but also the phylogenetically primitive nature of peptides, which could account for their having overlapping functions, in many cases, where one function can be carried out by more than one peptide.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some conventional 'hormonal' functions are evident for several of the peptides (e.g.PRL and lactation), but research into the role of peptides confronts us with an ever-increasing complexity which makes 'hormonal' explanations of peptide function less and less helpful.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Future directions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“We have built on Gray's model with our dual control model of sexual behaviour, which postulates parallel function and interaction of sexual excitatory and inhibitory systems in the brain (Bancroft 1999, Bancroft & Janssen 2000).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Future directions
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(5) With no such desensitization in females, the basic genetic variability would be more evident, at much lower levels of testosterone, and manifested as greater variability in behavioural responsiveness, demonstrated from early adolescent development (or adrenarche) onwards.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Testosterone
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effects on mood and general arousability may be relevant to sexual arousal indirectly.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Testosterone
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The concept clearly remains relevant to the role of gonadal steroids, in particular testosterone, even though there are a number of uncertainties about how these 'hormonal' effects are mediated at the target organ.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Future directions
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(4) Possible consequences of such desensitization in the male include that (i) genetically determined variations in CNS receptor responsiveness to androgens, across individuals, are 'flattened out' and hence less evident and (ii) much higher levels of testosterone from puberty onwards are possible without hyperstimulation of CNS mechanisms.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Testosterone
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(1) The greater variability in the sensitivity to androgens in women could result from a greater genetic variability in women, on the grounds that in women behavioural responsiveness to gonadal steroids is less crucial to reproduction than is the case with men.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Testosterone
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: There is a striking difference in the sensitivity of the female and male brain to testosterone.
- Rests on an assumption: In women, behavioural responsiveness to gonadal steroids is less crucial to reproduction than in men.
In the paper
“For example, females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), particularly the salt-losing variety which is associated with higher levels of testosterone during fetal development, show not only some degree of masculinization of behaviour, but also low levels of sexual interest and activity associated with low fertility (Meyer-Bahlburg 1999).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Testosterone
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Meyer-Bahlburg 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“(3) Exposure to substantially higher levels of testosterone during fetal development and also during the first few weeks post-natally could be responsible for desensitizing the CNS to testosterone effects in the male.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Testosterone
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From this perspective, inhibition of sexual response, for the majority, is adaptive, preventing sexual arousal in circumstances that are perceived to be dangerous or risky, or in the case of the post-ejaculatory refractory period, ensuring that fertility is not impaired by too frequent ejaculations (all adaptive patterns of obvious relevance across species).”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Future directions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is postulated that if males were as sensitive to the CNS effects of testosterone as females, then the behavioural effects of these masculinizing levels would be maladaptive.Hence there is a need in the male to reduce responsiveness to androgen effects in the brain.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > Testosterone
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Greater levels of testosterone in men are necessary for masculinizing effects such as increased growth and muscle bulk, dependent on the peripheral anabolic effects of testosterone.
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from non-human primate studies on the site of action of testosterone in the brain are relevant to the human brain and to human sexual arousal.
“For obvious reasons, we are largely dependent on animal studies on this topic, although mainly primate studies will be considered here.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The localization of androgen receptors in the brain indicates sites where androgens act on sexual and reproductive behaviour.
“Whereas much of the reported localization is consistent with androgenic effects on sexual and reproductive behaviour”
The paper relies on this without support.
Plasma hormone changes during sexual arousal or orgasm reflect central mechanisms relevant to sexual function.
“So far, no changes in plasma levels of -endorphin have been found during sexual arousal or orgasm in men (Kruger et al. 1998) or women (Exton et al. 1999).”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a striking difference in the sensitivity of the female and male brain to testosterone.
“The striking difference in the sensitivity of the female and male brain to testosterone is a crucial issue waiting to be explained.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Greater levels of testosterone in men are necessary for masculinizing effects such as increased growth and muscle bulk, dependent on the peripheral anabolic effects of testosterone.
“Greater levels of testosterone in men are necessary for masculinizing effects, such as increased growth and muscle bulk, dependent on the peripheral anabolic effects of testosterone.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In women, behavioural responsiveness to gonadal steroids is less crucial to reproduction than in men.
“on the grounds that in women behavioural responsiveness to gonadal steroids is less crucial to reproduction than is the case with men.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is striking variability in the responsiveness of women to testosterone.
“Given the striking variability in the responsiveness of women to testosterone, there is a need to identify markers of testosterone responsiveness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The recent controversy over testosterone patches for low sexual desire in women, and the FDA refusal to approve such use even for postoophorectomized women, is partly based on the relatively weak treatment effect in the reported studies.
“The recent controversy over the use of testosterone patches for low sexual desire in women, and the refusal by the Federal Drug Administration to approve such use, even for postoophorectomized women, is partly based on the relatively weak treatment effect in the reported studies.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, dopamine antagonism may result in prolactin elevation, which may have an effect on libido (Bancroft 2005)”
From Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (2015) · cites this paper as Bancroft 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > References
“Kruger THC, Exton MS, Pawlak C, von zur Muhlen A, Hartmann U & Schedlowski M 2003b Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular response to sexual arousal and orgasm in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23 401-411.”
§ The endocrinology of sexual arousal > References
“Kruger T, Exton MS, Pawlak C, von zur Muhlen A, Hartmann U & Schedlowski M 1998 Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular response to sexual arousal and orgasm in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23 401-411.”
Citations
Cites
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
Hoskins, R. G. (1953) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-13-4-473 · Cited by 3,780
The psychology of fear and stress
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-2399 · Cited by 3,133
Drives and the C. N. S. (conceptual nervous system).
Hebb, D. O. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0041823 · Cited by 2,090
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1920–1945
Kosmak, G. W. (1945) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(45)90038-x · Cited by 2,071
Bôle-Feysot, C., Goffin, V., Edery, M., Binart, N., & Kelly, P. (1998) · Endocrine reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.19.3.0334 · Cited by 1,973
The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive–sensitization view
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2000) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.95.8s2.19.x · Cited by 1,507
ORENTREICH, N., BRIND, J. L., RIZER, R. L., & VOGELMAN, J. H. (1984) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-59-3-551 · Cited by 1,349
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
(2011) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-0760(11)00143-9 · Cited by 1,233
The physiology of male sexual behavior
Meisel, R. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 988
Transdermal testosterone treatment in women with impaired sexual function after oophorectomy.
Shifren, J. L., Braunstein, G. D., Simon, J. A., Casson, P. R., Buster, J. E., Redmond, G. P., Burki, R. E., Ginsburg, E. S., Rosen, R. C., Leiblum, S. R., et al. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200009073431002 · Cited by 954
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [6]6. Appelt H & Strauss B 1986 The psychoendocrinology of female sexuality: a research project. German Journal of Psychology 10 143-156.
- [61]61. Hull EM, Lorrain DS, Du J, Matuszewich L, Bitran D, Nishita JK & Scaletta LL 1998 Organizational and activational effects of dopamine on male sexual behavior. In Males, females and behavior: toward biological understanding. pp 79-96. Eds L Ellis & L Eberty. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
- [73]73. Eds ER Kandel, JH Schwartz & TM Jessell. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange. Lindzey J & Korach KS 2003 Estrogen action in males: insights through mutations in aromatase and estrogen-receptor genes. In Androgens in Health and Disease, pp 89-102. Eds CJ Bagatell & WJ Bremner. Totawa: Humana Press.
- [86]86. Eds F Kandeel, T Lue, J Pryor & R Swerdloff. New York: Marcel Dekker. (In Press)
- [130]130. Wallen K & Parsons WA 1998 Androgen may increase sexual motivation in estrogen-treated ovariectomized rhesus monkeys by increasing estrogen availability. Serono International Symposium on Biology of Menopause. Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McCabe, M. P., Sharlip, I. D., Atalla, E., Balon, R., Fisher, A. D., Laumann, E., Lee, S. W., Lewis, R., & Segraves, R. T. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.019 · Cited by 605
Association of Specific Symptoms and Metabolic Risks with Serum Testosterone in Older Men
Zitzmann, M., Faber, S., & Nieschlag, E. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0401 · Cited by 552
Autism, oxytocin and interoception
Quattrocki, E., & Friston, K. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.012 · Cited by 393
Pair-Bonding, Romantic Love, and Evolution
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614561683 · Cited by 434
“The major hormone driving sexual arousal (passion) in men is testosterone (Bancroft, 2005).”
BackgroundHull, E. M., & Rodrı́guez–Manzo, G. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008088783-8.00001-2 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Bancroft, J.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bancroft, J
- Venue
- Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-427
- ISSN
- 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-6805
- OpenAlex
- W2171688960
- Semantic Scholar
- de051a9a61494653d115ccf6b266c6443120b87c
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 139
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- sexual arousal, testosterone, estradiol, oxytocin, beta-endorphin, prolactin, brain, hypogonadism, older men, aromatization, gender differences, women, dopamine inhibition
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aging, beta-Endorphin, Estradiol, Female, Humans, Libido, Male, Oxytocin, Prolactin, Reproduction, Sex, Sexual Behavior, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Testosterone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review