Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased Immunogenicity and Cause of Graft Loss of Old Donor Kidneys

FIJTER, JOHAN W. DE, MALLAT, MARKO J. K., DOXIADIS, ILIAS I. N., RINGERS, JAN, ROSENDAAL, FRITS R., CLAAS, FRANS H. J., PAUL, LEENDERT C.·2001·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Abstract.: Donor age was identified recently as a major factor that determines long-term outcome after transplantation, but the mechanism that is responsible for increased graft loss of old donor kidneys is unknown. The influence of donor age on graft survival was assessed retrospectively in 514 consecutive first cadaveric transplants that were treated with cyclosporine maintenance immunosuppression. Donor age ≥50 yr (relative risk [RR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 2.6), acute rejection (RR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.0), and type of rejection (RR = 3.3; 95% CI, 2.0 to 5.3) had a significant impact on graft survival. However, when subsets of patients who entered subsequent intervals after transplantation were analyzed, donor age was not an independent predictive factor of graft loss. Donor age (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.98), human leukocyte antigen-DR mismatch (RR = 2.28; 95% CI, 1.78 to 2.92), and recipient age (RR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.72) were associated significantly with acute rejection episodes. Delayed graft function alone was not associated independently with the occurrence of early acute rejection (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.61). The timing of the rejection episodes of old donor kidneys was not different, and the excess rejection prevalence was attributable entirely to interstitial (grade I) types of rejection. Interstitial rejection episodes in kidneys from old donors had a significant (P < 0.05) negative impact on graft survival. Beyond the first year, poor renal function and proteinuria were significant risk factors for graft loss, regardless of rejection. Our data fit best the hypothesis that increased graft loss of older donor kidneys results from an increased incidence of acute interstitial rejection episodes in the early posttransplantation months. It is proposed that kidneys from older donors are more immunogenic than kidneys from young donors and that acute rejection episodes result in functional deterioration. Contrary to interstitial rejection in kidneys from younger donors, kidneys from old donors seem to have an impaired ability to restore tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.v1271538

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
FIJTER, J. W. D., MALLAT, M. J. K., DOXIADIS, I. I. N., RINGERS, J., ROSENDAAL, F. R., CLAAS, F. H. J., & PAUL, L. C.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2001-07
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
1538-1546
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1923079464
Cited by
252
References
18
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased Immunogenicity and Cause of Graft Loss of Old Donor Kidneys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v1271538
The paper
FIJTER, J. W. D., MALLAT, M. J. K., DOXIADIS, I. I. N., RINGERS, J., ROSENDAAL, F. R., CLAAS, F. H. J., & PAUL, L. C. (2001). Increased Immunogenicity and Cause of Graft Loss of Old Donor Kidneys. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v1271538

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.