The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand
Abstract
Providing accurate sensory information to the individual with a myoelectric limb is of great importance for improving device use in a wide variety of tasks. A number of feedback systems presently being investigated rely on either vibrotactile or electrotactile skin stimulation, which does not provide sensory patterns similar to those in a natural grasping hand. A prototype system was developed to enhance sensory information transfer by using a technique in which the feedback modality (pressure) was the same as the grasping pressure. The present study compared the developed system (pressure) with vibrotactile feedback, vision, and compounds of these three modes. It was found that the pressure-pressure concept reduced grasping pressure replication errors and error variability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This technique may be superior to vibro-tactile substitution in that it reduces the grasping force error of prostheses, thereby providing more accurate spatial sensory information (Patterson and Katz, 1992; Antfolk et al., 2013a).”
From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Patterson and Katz, 1992
Citations
Cites
Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning
García, J., & Koelling, R. A. (1966) · Psychonomic Science · doi:10.3758/bf03342209 · Cited by 2,006
On the generality of the laws of learning.
Seligman, M. E. (1970) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0029790 · Cited by 1,744
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF WANTS, INTERESTS AND ATTITUDES
Thorndike Edward, L. (1936) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-193610000-00051 · Cited by 163
Extended physiologic taction: design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system.
Meek, S. G., Jacobsen, S. C., & Goulding, P. P. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 116
Solomonow, M., Lyman, J., & Freedy, A. (1977) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/bf02409338 · Cited by 111
Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control
Scott, R. N., Brittain, R. H., Caldwell, R. R., Cameron, A. B., & Dunfield, V. A. (1980) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02442481 · Cited by 93
A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback
Shannon, G. F. (1979) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02440956 · Cited by 92
A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses
Shannon, G. F. (1976) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02478123 · Cited by 91
Artificial touch in a hand-prosthesis
Beeker, T. W., During, J., & den Hertog, A. (1967) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02478841 · Cited by 55
Powered Limb Prostheses: Their Clinical Significance
Childress, D. S. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1973.324273 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics
Antfolk, C., D’Alonzo, M., Rosén, B., Lundborg, G., Sebelius, F., & Cipriani, C. (2013) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/erd.12.68 · Cited by 466
Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective
Peerdeman, B., Boere, D., Witteveen, H. J. B., `tVeld, R. H. I., Hermens, H. J., Stramigioli, S., Rietman, H. S., Veltink, P. H., & Misra, S. (2011) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.08.0161 · Cited by 467
Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees
Marasco, P. D., Kim, K., Colgate, J. E., Peshkin, M. A., & Kuiken, T. A. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq361 · Cited by 335
Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use
Farina, D., Vujaklija, I., Brånemark, R., Bull, A. M. J., Dietl, H., Graimann, B., Hargrove, L. J., Hoffmann, K.-P., Huang, H., Ingvarsson, T., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00732-x · Cited by 263
Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review
Shull, P. B., & Damian, D. D. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0055-z · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Patterson, P. E., & Katz, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
- 0748-7711
- OpenAlex
- W1987158471
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- myoelectric hand, sensory feedback, pressure feedback, vibrotactile feedback, electrocutaneous stimulation, prosthetic hand, sensory substitution
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Artificial Limbs, Biofeedback, Psychology, Hand, Humans, Male, Pressure, Sensation, Skin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
