Cited by 24Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementDysphagia Assessment and Management

Predictive value of upper-limb accelerometry in acute stroke with hemiparesis

Gebruers, Nick, Truijen, Steven, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan, De Deyn, Peter P.·2013·Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Abstract

Few studies have investigated how well early activity measurements by accelerometers predict recovery after stroke. First, we assessed the predictive value of accelerometer-based measurements of upper-limb activity in patients with acute stroke with a hemiplegic arm. Second, we established the difference in arm activity between hospitalized stroke and nonstroke patients. In total, 129 patients with acute stroke and 19 controls participated. Activity of the upper limbs was monitored for 48 h, and these data were used to determine the predictive value of the activity variables compared with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), which was assessed at 3 mo poststroke onset. The sensitivity and specificity in relation to the mRS were 0.80 and 0.77, respectively, for the activity of impaired arm (AIA) and 0.85 and 0.75, respectively, for the ratio variable calculated by dividing the AIA by the activity of the nonimpaired arm. The corresponding cutoff values were 597,546 counts for AIA and 0.33 for the ratio. The predictive value of AIA combined with age was 85% to the disability status defined as an mRS score of 2 or less.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1682/jrrd.2012.09.0166

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gebruers, N., Truijen, S., Engelborghs, S., & De Deyn, P. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Department of Health Care Sciences, University College of Antwerp, Merksem, Belgium;
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Published
2013
Volume
50
Issue
8
Pages
1099-106
ISSN
  • 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
  • 0748-7711
  • 1938-1352
OpenAlex
W1997559350
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
stroke, hemiparesis, upper limb activity, accelerometry, activity monitoring, functional recovery prediction, modified Rankin Scale, activity ratios, hospitalized stroke patients, disability assessment
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Paresis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Recovery of Function, Stroke, Upper Extremity, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review