Cited by 57Writing and Handwriting EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Learning to write synthesis texts in secondary education: a review of intervention studies

Open access
Van Ockenburg, L., Van Weijen, D., Rijlaarsdam, G.·2019·Journal of Writing Research

Abstract

This study aims to explore effective ways in which students can learn to write synthesis texts. First, through a systematic literature search we found 16 (quasi-)experimental studies from 6th grade to undergraduate level in the field of learning to write source-based synthesis texts, that met our inclusion criteria. Second, we formulated a general instructional design principle, that included three main processes: (a) selecting relevant/important information from sources, (b) organizing, and (c) connecting that information. Bottom-up analyses of the six most effective studies yielded a set of learning activities that contribute to the improvement of students’ performance on writing synthesis texts. Subsequently, we supplemented our general design principle with relevant learning activities obtained from these effective interventions. One effective intervention differed considerably from the others due to its divergent nature, but its content was considered valuable enough to warrant the inclusion of an additional design principle. The design principles formulated in this study can be used as guidelines for future interventions in synthesis writing or as a means of support for teachers who want to develop educational materials for teaching synthesis writing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17239/jowr-2019.10.03.01

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In order to acquire synthesizing skills, it is necessary to involve students in a set of learning activities that promote all three transformational processes: selecting information from sources, organizing, and connecting that information.

    “In a review study in the field of learning to write source-based synthesis texts, Van Ockenburg et al. (2019) stated that in order to acquire synthesizing skills it was necessary to involve students in a set of learning activities that promote all three transformational processes: selecting information from sources, organizing, and connecting that information.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Flower, L. (1989). Negotiating academic discourse (reading-to-write report no. 10). Technical Report No. 29. *Gil, L., VidalAbarca, E., & Martínez, T. (2008). Efficacy of note-taking to integrate information from multiple documents. [Eficacia de tomar notas para integrar informacion de varios textos.] Infancia y Aprendizaje / Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 31(2), 259-272.
  2. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research. (pp. 187-207). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
  3. *Klein, P. D., & Rose, M. A. (2010). Teaching argument and explanation to prepare junior students for writing to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 433-461. https://doi.org/10.1598/ RRQ.45.4.4 · DOI
  4. Martinez, I., Martin, E., & Mateos, M. (2011). Teaching to read and write to learn in primary education. Cultura Y Educacion, 23(3), 399-414.
  5. Robledo-Ramón, P. (2016) Eficacia de un programa de instrucción estratégica para la mejora de las síntesis escritas en alumnado universitario. [Efficacy of a strategic instruction program for the improvement of written summaries in university students ] In Variables Psicológicas y Educativas para la intervención en el ámbito escolar: Volumen II (pp. 45-52). ASUNIVEP.
  6. Robledo-Ramón, P., & García, J. N. (2017). Description and analysis of strategy-focused instructional models for writing. In Fidalgo, R., Olive, T., (Vol Eds.)
  7. Spivey, N. N., & King, J. R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.24.1.1 · DOI
  8. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Ockenburg, L., Van Weijen, D., & Rijlaarsdam, G.
Venue
Journal of Writing Research
Published
2019-02
Volume
10
Issue
vol. 10 issue 3
Pages
401-428
ISSN
  • 2030-1006 (ISSN-L)
  • 2294-3307
OpenAlex
W2914944105
Cited by
57
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7
FWCI
20.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Writing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (023.007.011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
synthesis writing, source-based writing, writing instruction, teaching principles, organizing information, learning activities, writing intervention, secondary education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review