Cited by 61Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesLinguistics and Education Research

Discourse synthesis: Textual transformations in writing from sources

Nelson, Nancy, King, James R.·2023·Reading and Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11145-021-10243-5

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, N., & King, J. R.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Reading and Writing
Published
2022-01-24
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
769-808
ISSN
  • 0922-4777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0905
OpenAlex
W4207045419
Cited by
61
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
FWCI
107.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading and Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
Keywords
discourse synthesis, synthesis writing, intertextuality, source texts, textual transformation, academic genres, cognitive constructivism, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review