Cited by 338Linguistics and Education ResearchDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesLiterary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics

The Constructivist Metaphor: Reading, Writing, and the Making of Meaning

Spivey, Nancy Nelson·1997·College Composition and Communication

Abstract

he Metaphor of Constructivism Remembering Bartlett Understanding as Construction Other Metaphors: Structuralism, Poststructuralism, and Deconstruction Composing as Construction Discourse Synthesis: Four Studies Textual Transformations in Written Discourse Authoring Identity Constructive Criticism References Name Index Subject Index

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/358470

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spivey, N. N.
Corresponding author
Spivey, Nancy Nelson
Venue
College Composition and Communication
Published
1997-12
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
588
ISSN
0010-096X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W564843537
Cited by
338
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
161.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
College Composition and Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
Keywords
constructivism, metaphor, reading, writing, meaning-making, Bartlett, structuralism, poststructuralism, deconstruction, composition, discourse, textual transformation, constructive criticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review