Cited by 57Health disparities and outcomesFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsEmployment and Welfare Studies

Impact of a guaranteed annual income program on Canadian seniors’ physical, mental and functional health

Open access
McIntyre, Lynn, Kwok, Cynthia, Emery, J. C. Herbert, Dutton, Daniel J.·2016·Canadian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objective Although there is widespread recognition that poverty is a key determinant of health, there has been less research on the impact of poverty reduction on health. Recent calls for a guaranteed annual income (GAI), defined as regular income provided to citizens by the state regardless of work status, raise questions about the impact, relative to the costs, of such a population health intervention. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of Canadian seniors' benefits (Old Age Security/Guaranteed Income Supplement, analogous to a GAI program) on the self-reported health, self-reported mental health and functional health of age-eligible, low-income seniors.Methods We used the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Survey to examine unattached adult respondents with an annual income of $20,000 or less, stratified by seniors' benefits/GAI eligibility (55-64 years: ineligible; 65-74 years: eligible). Using regression, we assessed self-reported health, selfreported mental health and functional health as measured by the Health Utilities Index, as outcomes for seniors' benefits/GAI-eligible and -ineligible groups.Results We found that individuals age-eligible for seniors' benefits/GAI had better health outcomes than recipients of conditional income assistance programs. Eligibility for seniors' benefits/GAI after age 64 was associated with better self-reported health, functional health and self-reported mental health outcomes, and these effects were observed until age 74.Conclusion Using seniors' benefits as an example, a GAI leads to significantly better mental health and improved health overall. These improvements are likely to yield reduced health care costs, which may offset the costs associated with program expansion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17269/cjph.107.5372

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Income-based interventions, including child benefits and public pension programs for seniors, reduced household food insecurity in Canada.

    “Studies have shown that income-based interventions, including child benefits [34–36] and public pension programs for seniors [37], reduced household food insecurity in Canada”

    From Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of food insecurity among post-secondary students and non-students of similar age in Canada (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results report lower food-insecurity prevalence among seniors eligible for benefits than among younger, ineligible groups, and the Discussion describes seniors’ benefits as an effective poverty-reduction strategy. But the study examined single, low-income Canadians aged 55–74, not Canadian households generally; it also used cross-sectional comparisons rather than measuring a reduction after an intervention. Citation [37] is attached to the pension-program portion, not the child-benefit portion. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]2. Raphael D. Poverty in Canada: Implications for Health and Quality of Life. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars' Press Inc., 2011.
  2. [6]6. Segal H. Guaranteed annual income: Why Milton Friedman and Bob Stanfield were right. Policy Options 2008;29(4):45-51.
  3. [27]27. Raphael D. Social determinants of health: An overview of key issues and themes. In: Raphael D (Ed.), Social Determinants of Health, 2 nd ed. Toronto, ON: Canadian Scholars' Press Inc., 2009.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McIntyre, L., Kwok, C., Emery, J. C. H., & Dutton, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
McIntyre, Lynn
Venue
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-03
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
e176-e182
ISSN
  • 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-7476
OpenAlex
W2511681023
Cited by
57
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN: 115208, 115208)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
guaranteed annual income, old-age security, Guaranteed Income Supplement, poverty reduction, low-income elderly, self-reported health, mental health, functional health, Health Utilities Index, population health interventions, health care costs
MeSH terms
Aged, Canada, Eligibility Determination, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Income, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Old Age Assistance, Poverty, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review