Cited by 46Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

CONSUMER ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS FOOD WASTE

Open access
Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, Radzymińska, Monika, Jakubowska, Dominika, Staniewska, Katarzyna·2016·Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development

Abstract

This paper presents the attitudes and behaviour of young consumers towards food waste based on a pilot qualitative research and data published in the literature. Qualitative research was conducted with the use of focus grou p method, with approximately 8-10 selected students per group. Four focus group sessions were held, with open discussion led by a moderator and the scenario containing problematic issues. The study included a total of thirty-seven students, aged 22- 25 years. Studies have shown that negative attitude of household towards food waste is not frequently refl ected in consumers' behaviour, despite their fundamental knowledge on how to reduce food waste. Respondents emphasized the need for educational campaigns. Properly selected and presented information will stimulate both consumer's attitude and behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17306/jard.2016.20

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some consumers associate food waste with negative emotions such as disgust, hate, frustration, annoyance, and anxiety.

    “Some consumers also associate food waste with emotions of 'disgust ' (Radzyminska et al., 2016;Waitt and Phillips, 2016;Watson and Meah, 2012), 'hate' (Waitt and Phillips, 2016), 'frustration' or 'annoyance' (Graham-Rowe et al., 2014), and 'anxiety' (Evans, 2011a;Graham-Rowe et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsztynie, U. W.-M. W., Radzymińska, M., Jakubowska, D., & Staniewska, K.
Affiliations
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Venue
Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development
Published
2016-03-30
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
1899-5241 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2553655640
Cited by
46
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food waste, consumer attitudes, consumer behavior, young consumers, university students, household food waste, food waste reduction, educational campaigns, attitude-behavior gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review