Cited by 359Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Reducing food waste: an investigation on the behaviour of Italian youths

Principato, Ludovica, Secondi, Luca, Pratesi, Carlo Alberto·2015·British Food Journal

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the knowledge of youths concerning food waste as well as to identify factors that influence changes in behaviour concerning food wasted and planning shopping for preventing it. Design/methodology/approach – The data used were collected from a sample of 233 students at Roma-Tre University in Italy. Probit models were specified to identify factors affecting food waste reduction in both pre-shopping and consumption phases. Findings – Results show that the more aware youths are concerning food waste, the more likely they are to reduce leftovers. In contrast, the concern about food freshness increases waste. A greater awareness of the consequences of food wasted increases the likelihood that youths will make a shopping list. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation of the study can be found in the non-probabilistic sampling design used for the collection of data. Practical implications – This study provides information for both social marketers and policy makers. New educational campaigns against food waste should be carried out by providing them with a realistic perception of food waste as well as by teaching young consumers how to recognize the level of freshness of food. Originality/value – This study provides a first insight of the factors that influence food waste reduction as well as the habit of making a shopping list from an individual perspective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bfj-10-2013-0314

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Principato, L., Secondi, L., & Pratesi, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT)
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
Venue
British Food Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2015-02-02
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
731-748
ISSN
0007-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093945116
Cited by
359
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Food Journal (publishedVersion)
  • UnitusOpen (Tuscia University) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
food waste reduction, youth behavior, consumer awareness, shopping lists, leftover food, university students, Italian youth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review