Cited by 7Problem and Project Based LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving PBL in Empowering Meta cognitive Skill of Students

Open access
Bahri, Arsad, Corebima, Aloysius Duran, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, State University of Makassar, (INDONESIA);, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Science, State University of Makassar, (INDONESIA);·2019·Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Abstract

Objective: Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a potential constructivist learning strategy that empowers students’ Meta cognitive skill. PBL focuses on problem, involves thinking activity to solve problems, and correlates to cognitive function of students. Methods: The implementation of PBL reveals various benefits, but there are also some weaknesses in this learning strategy. Thus, it is necessary to implement a certain learning strategy that can cover the PBL weaknesses, such as Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) learning strategy. RQA is a new learning strategy developed based on a fact that almost all students do not read the next lecture materials, causing failure of learning strategy planned and finally the students’ comprehension becomes low. RQA is also potential to empower students’ Meta cognitive skill. Findings: The integration of RQA and PBL learning strategy is called PBL-RQA learning strategy. This study was a quasi-experimental study designed to compare the effect of PBL, RQA, and PBL-RQA learning strategies on the students’ Meta cognitive skill of Faculty of Mathematics and Science, State University of Makassar. Application: The results of the study showed that the potency of PBL learning strategy in empowering the students’ Meta cognitive skill has been increased by integrating it to RQA learning strategy. The meta cognitive skill mean score of the students taught by PBL-RQA learning strategy was 21% higher than that of the students taught by PBL and 26.9% higher than that of the students taught by RQA learning strategy. Keywords: Answering, Meta Cognitive Skill, Problem-Based Learning, Questioning, Reading, PBL-RQA

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i17/69226

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Strategies for Teaching Science: What Works? Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00098655.1996.10114334. Date accessed: 1996. · DOI
  2. Flavell JH., 1976, Meta cognitive Aspect of Problem Solving., The Nature of Intelligence., 231
  3. Metacognition: An Overview. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234755498_Metacognition_An_Overview. Date accessed: 01/2003.
  4. Examining Meta cognitive Self-Regulation within The Context of Daily Academic Tasks [Doctoral dissertation]. Available from: https://repository.wcsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=educationdis. Date accessed: 1998.
  5. Sungur S, Tekkaya C., 2006;, Effect of PBL and Traditional Instruction on Self-Regulated Learning., The Journal of Educational Research., 99, 307
  6. Downing K., 2010, Problem-Based Learning and Metacognition., Asian Journal on Education and Learning., 1, 75
  7. Steck TR, Di Biase W, Wang C, Boukhtiarov A., 2012, The Use of Open-Ended PBL Scenarios in An Interdisciplinary Biotechnology Class: Evaluation of a PBL Course Across Three Years., Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education., 13, 2
  8. Izzaty RE., 2006, Problem Based Learning dalam Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi., Paradigma., 1, 77
  9. Marchant GJ., 1989, Meta-teaching: A Metaphor for Reflective Teaching., Education., 109, 487
  10. Cornoldi C., 1998, The Impact of Meta cognitive Reflection on Cognitive Control., Metacognition and Cognitive Neuropsychology, 139
  11. Treagust DF, Peterson RF., 1998, Learning To Teach Primary Science Trough Problem Based Learning., Science Education., 82, 215
  12. Downing K, Kwong T, Chan SW, Lam TF, Downing WK., 2009, PBL and Development of Metacognition., High Education Journal., 57, 609
  13. Yuan H, Kunaviktikul W, Klunklin A, Williams BA., 2008, Promoting Critical Thinking Skills through PBL., Journal of Social Science and Humanities., 2, 85
  14. Muhson A., 2009, Improving Students 'Interest and Understanding of Students Through Application of Problem-Based Learning., Journal Kependidikan., 39, 171
  15. Hmelo-Silver CE., 2004, PBL: What and How Do Students Learn?, Educational Psychology Review., 16, 235
  16. Sumampouw HM., 2011, Metacognitive and High-Level Thinking Skills in Genetic Learning (Concept Articulation and Empirical Verification)., Bioedukasi., 4, 23
  17. Bazerman C., 1985, Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema., Written Communication., 2, 3
  18. Dhieb-Henia N., 2006;, Applying Meta cognitive Strategies to Skimming Reasearch Articles in An English for Specific Purposes Context., English Teaching Forum., 44, 2
  19. Schraw G, Moshman D., 1995, Meta cognitive Theories., Educational Psychology Review., 7, 351
  20. Theory - Learning Theory. Available from: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=id&u=https://www.academia.edu/16542681/TEORI-TEORIBELAJAR&prev=search. Date accessed: 1988.
  21. Schumaker JB, Deshler DD., 1992, Validation of Learning Strategy Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: Results of A Programatic Research Effort., Contemporary Intervention Research in Learning Disabilities: An International Perspective., 22
  22. Schraw G, Dennison RS., 1994, Assessing Meta cognitive Awareness., Contemporary Educational Psychology., 19, 460
  23. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31640337_Learning_Together_and_Alone_Cooperative_Competitive_and_Individualistic_Learning_DWJohnson_RT_Johnson. Date accessed: 1999.
  24. Hewitt G., 1995, Reciprocal Teaching: Toward Student Autonomy in Reading., English Teaching Forum., 33, 28

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Bahri, A., Corebima, A. D., Department of Biology, F. O. M. A. S., & Department of Biology, F. O. M. A. S.
Affiliations
State University of Makassar (ID)
Corresponding author
Corebima, Aloysius Duran
Venue
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2019-05-01
Volume
12
Issue
17
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 0974-5645 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-6846
OpenAlex
W2981757954
Cited by
6
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Eprints (Universitas Negeri Makassar) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
problem-based learning, Reading Questioning and Answering, metacognitive skills, constructivist learning, student understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review