Cited by 18Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisMycobacterium research and diagnosis

Role of CB-NAAT in diagnosing Mycobacterial tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in tubercular peripheral lymphadenopathy

Open access
P.G Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, People College of Medical Sciences RC, Bhanpur, Bhopal, MP, India, Singh, Dr. Krishna Gopal, Tandon, Dr Sanjay, Professor and Head, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, People College of Medical Sciences RC, Bhanpur, Bhopal, MP, India, Nagdeote, Dr S.T, Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, People College of Medical Sciences RC, Bhanpur, Bhopal, MP, India, Sharma, Dr. Kapil, Assistant Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, People College of Medical Sciences RC, Bhanpur, Bhopal, MP, India +2 more·2017·International Journal of Medical Research and Review

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosis of Extra Pulmonary TB (EPTB) remains a challenge. This study assessed the applicability of CB-NAAT in early diagnosis of EPTB, especially peripheral lymphadenopathy and early identification of MDR-TB in TB lymphadenopathy. Material & Method: This was a prospective, cross sectional study, carried out on all patients of age group 10 to 80 years, who were suspected cases of tubercular peripheral lymphadenopathy, visiting the OPD of the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, People’s Hospital, Bhopal, over a period of 1 year 6 months. FNA of peripheral lymph nodes of 57 patients was sent for cytology and CB-NAAT. Result: This study showed that statistical difference in diagnostic yield of FNAC (47/57 i.e. 82.4%) and CB-NAAT (44/57 i.e. 77.19%) in tubercular peripheral lymphnode sample was not significant. This implies that there was not much difference in these two test results. There was no rifampicin resistance in the population studied. Conclusion: CB-NAAT did not diagnose more cases of TB-LN than FNAC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17511/ijmrr.2017.i03.05

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensitivity of ZN in the present study was lower than that reported from India (91%).

    “The sensitivity of ZN in the present study was lower than that reported from Tirupati, India (83.3%) [19] and India(91%) [20], while it was higher than that reported from Bangladesh (17.6%) [21] and Ethiopia (22.9%) [22].”

    From Performance of fine needle aspiration cytology and Ziehl-Neelsen staining technique in the diagnosis of tuberculosis lymphadenitis (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Abstract and Discussion report FNAC and CB-NAAT results for patients in Bhopal, but do not report a 91% sensitivity for ZN staining. Searches for “ZN sensitivity 91%,” “Ziehl Neelsen staining,” and “91%” found no passage establishing the figure attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dandapat MC. Diagnosis of tubercular lymphadenitis by fine needle aspiration cytology. Indian J Tuberc 1987; 37: 139-142.
  2. R. K. Narang. Place of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy. Ind. J. Tub. 1990, 37, 29.
  3. Malakar ILN. Aspiration Cytology for the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Lymphadenopathies:A Five-year Study. Ind. J. Tub., 1991 , 38, 17.
  4. Mark pinto Nicole Molecular method in node. Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews,2013,Vol.9,No3
  5. Rajsekaran S. Tuberculous cervical lymphadenitis in HIV positive and negative patients. Indian J Tuberc 2001; 48: 201-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
P.G Resident, D. O. P. M., Singh, D. K. G., Tandon, D. S., Professor and Head, D. O. P. M., Nagdeote, D. S. T., Professor, D. O. P. M., Sharma, D. K., Assistant Professor, D. O. P. M., Kumar, D. A., & P.G Resident, D. O. P. M.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Research and Review
Published
2017-03-31
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
242-246
ISSN
  • 2320-8686 (ISSN-L)
  • 2321-127X
OpenAlex
W2754170296
Cited by
18
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Medical Research and Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, peripheral lymphadenopathy, rifampicin resistance, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, extrapulmonary tuberculosis, fine needle aspiration cytology, diagnostic yield, molecular diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review