The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-governance and forest resources
Open accessAbstract
Forest resources share attributes with many other resource systems that make difficult their governance and management in a sustainable, efficient and equitable manner. Destruction or degradation of forest resources is most likely to occur in open-access forests where those involved, or external authorities, have not established effective governance. Conventional theories applied to forest resources presumed that forest users themselves were incapable of organizing to overcome the temptations to overharvest. Extensive empirical research, however, has challenged this theory and illustrated the many ways that forest users themselves have devised rules that regulate harvesting patterns so as to ensure the sustainability of forest resources over time. There is now a large body of literature analysing common-pool resources such as many fisheries, irrigation systems and rangelands. A growing consensus exists in this literature concerning the attributes of common-pool resources and of resource users that enhance the probability that self-organization will occur. Many of these attributes seem also to help predict when forest users will self-organize. Forest users are more likely to devise their own rules when they use a forest that is starting to deteriorate but has not substantially disappeared, when some forest products provide early warning concerning forest conditions, when forest products are predictably available, and when the forest is sufficiently small that users can develop accurate knowledge of conditions. Self-organization is more likely to occur when forest resources are highly salient to users, and when users have a common understanding of the problems they face, have a low discount rate, trust one another, have autonomy to make some of their own rules, an d have prior organizational experience. These attributes of forests and of the user community affect the benefits and costs of organizing to protect and enhance forest resources. When users create organizations consistent with a set of design principles, they are likely to be able to sustain their own institutional arrangements over a long period of time. This growing consensus about the attributes of users and resources has been applied in the design of policies intended to enhance the participation of local users in the governance and management of common-pool resources, including many forests. Supporting further research - especially studies of forests and their users over time - is an important foundation for even more effective public policies in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic
Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164023 · Cited by 1,037
Cited by
Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management
Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x · Cited by 667
Poverty Alleviation and Tropical Forests—What Scope for Synergies?
Wunder, S. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00070-5 · Cited by 625
The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services
Corbera, E., Brown, K., & Adger, W. N. (2007) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x · Cited by 373
Hayes, T. M. (2006) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.002 · Cited by 353
Forests, Governance, and Sustainability: Common Property Theory and its Contributions
Agrawal, A. (2007) · International Journal of the Commons · doi:10.18352/bmgn-lchr.10 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostrom, E.
- Venue
- Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks
- Published
- 1999
- OpenAlex
- W2108919059
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-governance and forest resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17528/cifor/000536
- The paper
- Ostrom, E. (1999). Self-governance and forest resources. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/000536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.