The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts
Open accessAbstract
The participation of users in system development and its role in IS success have been core topics of IS research since the 1960s, yet critical analysis and recent changes in IS practice suggest the need to revisit the topic. The purpose of this paper is to revitalize participation as an important area of IS theorizing and research and to build the foundations for an updated theory that is robust enough to accommodate changing IS practice. In this paper, we critically analyze traditional IS participation theory and show that it contains partial and conflicting explanations for participation~{!/~}s effects on system success. These explanations leave important conceptual issues unresolved, particularly when viewed in light of developments such as ERP system installations, outsourcing, and new software development approaches such as contextual design. To address these gaps, we outline the key elements of a new theoretical framework, including a redefined concept of system success, an elaborated conceptualization of participants and other actors, a fine-grained characterization of participation activities, and a restatement of hypothesized causal links among the concepts. We conclude with a brief discussion of research strategies for investigating the framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
Checkland, P. B. (1981) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 6,256
Systems thinking, systems practice
(1982) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90206-5 · Cited by 3,545
Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.4.23 · Cited by 3,335
Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice
(2004) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing · doi:10.1007/b115738 · Cited by 3,122
Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems
Beyer, H. R., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997) · Cited by 2,748
A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success
Seddon, P. B. (1997) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.240 · Cited by 2,437
Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use
Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440 · Cited by 1,540
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
(2000) · Cited by 1,267
Cited by
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
User Participation in Information Systems Security Risk Management1
Spears, J. L., & Barki, H. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25750689 · Cited by 281
(2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 87
Users as knowledge co-producers in the information system development project
Hsu, J. S.-C., Lin, T.-C., Zheng, G.-T., & Hung, Y.-W. (2012) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.008 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentley College, U., Markus, M. L., Mao, J.-Y., & Renmin University of China, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 514-544
- ISSN
- 1536-9323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128555200
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 27.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17705/1jais.00057
- The paper
- Bentley College, U., Markus, M. L., Mao, J.-Y., & Renmin University of China, C. (2004). Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.