The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User Participation in Information Systems Security Risk Management1
Abstract
This paper examines user participation in information systems security risk management and its influence in the context of regulatory compliance via a multi-method study at the organizational level. First, eleven informants across five organizations were interviewed to gain an understanding of the types of activities and security controls in which users participated as part of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, along with associated outcomes. A research model was developed based on the findings of the qualitative study and extant user participation theories in the systems development literature. Analysis of the data collected in a questionnaire survey of 228 members of ISACA, a professional association specialized in information technology governance, audit, and security, supported the research model. The findings of the two studies converged and indicated that user participation contributed to improved security control performance through greater awareness, greater alignment between IS security risk management and the business environment, and improved control development. While the IS security literature often portrays users as the weak link in security, the current study suggests that users may be an important resource to IS security by providing needed business knowledge that contributes to more effective security measures. User participation is also a means to engage users in protecting sensitive information in their business processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376806 · Cited by 5,807
The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001 · Cited by 1,941
Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use
Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.440 · Cited by 1,540
Self-citationCombining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology
Mingers, J. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709 · Cited by 1,380
Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology.
Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224 · Cited by 1,358
User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research
Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · Cited by 1,318
D'Arcy, J., Hovav, A., & Galletta, D. (2009) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0160 · Cited by 1,168
Coping With Systems Risk: Security Planning Models for Management Decision Making1
Straub, D. W., & Welke, R. J. (1998) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249551 · Cited by 1,120
Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Information Systems Research: A Case Study1
Kaplan, B., & Duchon, D. (1988) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249133 · Cited by 1,074
Integrating Positivist and Interpretive Approaches to Organizational Research
Lee, A. S. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.4.342 · Cited by 1,031
Cited by
Shaikh, F. A., & Siponen, M. (2023) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102974 · Cited by 135
Wang, Z., Wang, N., Su, X., & Ge, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.002 · Cited by 134
Seidel, S., & Urquhart, C. (2013) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2013.17 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Spears, J. L., & Barki, H.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 503-522
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W3146559281
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 34.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User Participation in Information Systems Security Risk Management1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/25750689
- The paper
- Spears, J. L., & Barki, H. (2010). User Participation in Information Systems Security Risk Management1. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.