Cited by 63Psychological Testing and AssessmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsStudent Assessment and Feedback

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Assessment Feedback on Rapport-Building and Self-Enhancement Processes

Allen, Andrea, Montgomery, Marilyn, Tubman, Jonathan, Frazier, Leslie, Escovar, Luis·2003·Journal of Mental Health Counseling

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to test the effects of assessment feedback on rapport and self-enhancement. After adult participants (N = 83) completed the Millon Index of Personality Styles, the experimental group was given personalized assessment feedback; the control group received only general information about the inventory. After the session, all rapport-related scores (positive evaluations of examiner and session) and most of the self-enhancement-related scores (accurate mirroring, self-esteem, self-competence, and self-understanding) were significantly higher in the group that received assessment feedback. These results suggest that both processes are mechanisms by which the provision of assessment feedback produces positive change. Implications for mental health counselors are drawn.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17744/mehc.25.3.lw7h84q861dw6ytj

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. American Mental Health Counseling Association, 2000, Code of Ethics of the American Mental Health Counselors Association
  2. Butcher, 1988, Objective personality assessment, 213
  3. Butcher, 1989, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring
  4. Escovar, 1997, The Millon inventories: Sociocultural considerations, 264
  5. Finn, 1996, Using the MMPI-2 as a therapeutic intervention
  6. Miller, 1997, The Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory (SASSI)
  7. Millon, 1994, Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory Manual III
  8. Millon, 1994, MIPS: Millon Index of Personality Styles Manual
  9. Oldham, 1990, Personality self-portrait: Why you think, work, love, and act the way you do
  10. Rollnick, 1999, Behavior health change: A guide for practitioners
  11. Rosenberg, 1979, Conceiving the self
  12. Sperry, 1995, Handbook of diagnosis and treatment of the DSM-IV personality disorders
  13. Weiss, 1997, The MIPS: Gauging the dimensions of normality, 498

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 63

Metadata

Authors
Allen, A., Montgomery, M., Tubman, J., Frazier, L., & Escovar, L.
Affiliations
Florida International University (US)
Venue
Journal of Mental Health Counseling
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
165-182
ISSN
  • 1040-2861 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-5749
OpenAlex
W1675113355
Cited by
63
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Mental Health Counseling (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
assessment feedback, rapport building, self-enhancement, personality assessment, self-esteem, self-competence, self-understanding, counselor-client relationship, mental health counseling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review