Cited by 358Critical Race Theory in EducationHigher Education Research StudiesRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

White Institutional Presence: The Impact of Whiteness on Campus Climate

Gusa, Diane Lynn·2010·Harvard Educational Review

Abstract

In this conceptual paper, Diane Gusa highlights the salience of race by scrutinizing the culture of Whiteness within predominately White institutions of higher education. Using existing research in higher education retention literature, Gusa examines embedded White cultural ideology in the cultural practices, traditions, and perceptions of knowledge that are taken for granted as the norm at institutions of higher education. Drawing on marginalization and discrimination experiences of African American undergraduates to illustrate the performance of White mainstream ideology,Gusa names this embedded ideology White institutional presence (WIP) and assigns it four attributes: White ascendancy, monoculturalism, White estrangement,and White blindness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17763/haer.80.4.p5j483825u110002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher education has a systemic integration of White values, cultures, and practices called White Institutional Presence.

    “Diane Lynn Gusa (2010) describes a systemic integration of White values, cultures, and practices in higher education, which she calls White Institutional Presence, or WIP.”
  • White Institutional Presence is the multifaceted and often overlooked cultural domination of Whites and Whiteness in higher education that leads to discrimination and marginalization for students of color.

    “WIP is the multifaceted and often overlooked cultural domination of Whites and Whiteness in institutions of higher education that lead to discrimination and marginalization for students of color.”
  • When Whites neglect to identify how White ideological homogenizing practices sustain domination and oppression, they allow institutional policies and practices to be seen as unproblematic or inevitable and thereby perpetuate hostile racial climates.

    “When Whites neglect to identify the ways in which White ideological homogenizing practices sustain the structure of domination and oppression, they allow institutional policies and practices to be seen as unproblematic or inevitable and thereby perpetuate hostile racial climates.(2010, p. 465)”
  • White ascendency leads to a sense of White entitlement, the notion that it is right and natural for Whites to maintain control over spaces, discourses, and outcomes.

    “White ascendency, the system of”
  • White blindness is an ideology that obscures or ignores White identity and privilege while espousing color blindness.

    “White blindness, which is an ideology that obscures or ignores White identity and privilege while simultaneously espousing the”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Gusa, D. L.
Corresponding author
Gusa, Diane Lynn
Venue
Harvard Educational Review
Published
2010-12-01
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
464-490
ISSN
  • 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-5045
OpenAlex
W1885458729
Cited by
358
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
whiteness, predominantly white institutions, campus climate, race and higher education, student retention, monoculturalism, institutional racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review