White Institutional Presence: The Impact of Whiteness on Campus Climate
Abstract
In this conceptual paper, Diane Gusa highlights the salience of race by scrutinizing the culture of Whiteness within predominately White institutions of higher education. Using existing research in higher education retention literature, Gusa examines embedded White cultural ideology in the cultural practices, traditions, and perceptions of knowledge that are taken for granted as the norm at institutions of higher education. Drawing on marginalization and discrimination experiences of African American undergraduates to illustrate the performance of White mainstream ideology,Gusa names this embedded ideology White institutional presence (WIP) and assigns it four attributes: White ascendancy, monoculturalism, White estrangement,and White blindness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher education has a systemic integration of White values, cultures, and practices called White Institutional Presence.
“Diane Lynn Gusa (2010) describes a systemic integration of White values, cultures, and practices in higher education, which she calls White Institutional Presence, or WIP.”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
White Institutional Presence is the multifaceted and often overlooked cultural domination of Whites and Whiteness in higher education that leads to discrimination and marginalization for students of color.
“WIP is the multifaceted and often overlooked cultural domination of Whites and Whiteness in institutions of higher education that lead to discrimination and marginalization for students of color.”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
When Whites neglect to identify how White ideological homogenizing practices sustain domination and oppression, they allow institutional policies and practices to be seen as unproblematic or inevitable and thereby perpetuate hostile racial climates.
“When Whites neglect to identify the ways in which White ideological homogenizing practices sustain the structure of domination and oppression, they allow institutional policies and practices to be seen as unproblematic or inevitable and thereby perpetuate hostile racial climates.(2010, p. 465)”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
White ascendency leads to a sense of White entitlement, the notion that it is right and natural for Whites to maintain control over spaces, discourses, and outcomes.
“White ascendency, the system of”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
White blindness is an ideology that obscures or ignores White identity and privilege while espousing color blindness.
“White blindness, which is an ideology that obscures or ignores White identity and privilege while simultaneously espousing the”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
Taken together, White Institutional Presence mechanisms result in White cultural domination of higher education that is neglectful or abusive to people of color and often unnoticed by the cultural majority.
“Taken together, these mechanisms result in a White cultural domination of higher education that is neglectful or even abusive to people of color within the institution, yet, with devastating effect, is often unnoticed by those in the cultural majority.”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
Monoculturalism is the expectation that all individuals conform to one scholarly worldview stemming from beliefs in the superiority and normalcy of White culture.
“Monoculturalism,”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
The dominance of White culture in higher education is evident in curriculum and pedagogy.
“the dominance of White culture in higher education is also evident in curriculum and pedagogy.”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
White estrangement sustains White Institutional Presence by distancing Whites physically and socially from people of color.
“White estrangement, which sustains WIP by”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa, 2010
The GBP employs monoculturalism and White blindness by ignoring cultural plurality and White dominance.
“However, the document employs what Gusa (2010) calls monoculturalism and White blindness by ignoring both the plurality of cultures and the dominance of White perspectives and influence upon the field.”
From In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library (2015) · cites this paper as Gusa (2010)
Cites
Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation
Harper, S. R., & Hurtado, S. (2007) · New Directions for Student Services · doi:10.1002/ss.254 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
Rankin, S. R., & Reason, R. D. (2005) · Journal of College Student Development · doi:10.1353/csd.2005.0008 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Pursuit of Antiracist Social Justice: Denaturalizing Whiteness in the Academic Library
Brook, F., Ellenwood, D., & Lazzaro, A. E. (2015) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2015.0048 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Jones, V. A., & Reddick, R. J. (2017) · The Journal of Negro Education · doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.86.3.0204 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gusa, D. L.
- Corresponding author
- Gusa, Diane Lynn
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 464-490
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W1885458729
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 12.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard Educational Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- whiteness, predominantly white institutions, campus climate, race and higher education, student retention, monoculturalism, institutional racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review