The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers: A Synthesis of Findings across OECD Countries
Abstract
Too many workers leave the labour market permanently due to health problems or disability, and too few people with reduced work capacity manage to remain in employment. This is a social and economic tragedy common to virtually all OECD countries. It also raises an apparent paradox that needs explaining: Why is it that the average health status is improving, yet large numbers of people of working age are leaving the workforce to rely on long-term sickness and disability benefits? This report, the last in the OECD series Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers, synthesises the project’s findings and explores the possible factors behind the paradox described above. It highlights the roles of institutions and policies and concludes that higher expectations and better incentives for the main actors – workers, employers, doctors, public agencies and service providers – are crucial. Based on a review of good and bad practices across OECD countries, this report suggests a series of major reforms are needed to promote employment of people with health problems. The report examines a number of critical policy choices between: tightening inflows and raising outflows from disability benefit, and promoting job retention and new hiring of people with health problems. It questions the need for distinguishing unemployment and disability as two distinct contingencies, emphasises the need for a better evidence base, and underlines the challenges for policy implementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092
Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.
Siegrist, J. (1996) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27 · Cited by 5,713
Cited by
Factors Affecting the Acceptance of People with Disabilities at Work: A Literature Review
Vornholt, K., Uitdewilligen, S., & Nijhuis, F. J. N. (2013) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9426-0 · Cited by 219
Hiring Discrimination: An Overview of (Almost) All Correspondence Experiments Since 2005
Baert, S. (2018) · Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71153-9_3 · Cited by 169
Sonnet, A., Olsen, H., & Manfredi, T. (2014) · De Economist · doi:10.1007/s10645-014-9240-x · Cited by 153
Cavanagh, J., Bartram, T., Meacham, H., Bigby, C., Oakman, J., & Fossey, E. (2017) · Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12111 · Cited by 117
Managers’ hiring intentions and the actual hiring of qualified workers with disabilities
Araten-Bergman, T. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1128466 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- OECD
- Venue
- OECD eBooks
- Publisher
- OECD
- Published
- 2010-11-24
- OpenAlex
- W4252885144
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.82
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers: A Synthesis of Findings across OECD Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/9789264088856-en
- The paper
- OECD. (2010). Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers: A Synthesis of Findings across OECD Countries. OECD eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.