Cited by 207Taxation and Legal IssuesCorporate Taxation and AvoidanceEconomic and Fiscal Studies

Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances, Action 6 - 2015 Final Report

OECD·2015·OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project

Abstract

Addressing base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) is a key priority of governments. In 2013, OECD and G20 countries, working together on an equal footing, adopted a 15-point Action Plan to address BEPS. This publication is the final report for Action 6.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/9789264241695-en

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project
Publisher
OECD
Published
2015-10-05
ISSN
  • 2313-2604 (ISSN-L)
  • 2313-2612
OpenAlex
W4254637963
Cited by
207
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9
FWCI
29.77
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
OECD/G20 base erosion and profit shifting project (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Taxation and Legal Issues
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
Keywords
base erosion and profit shifting, BEPS Action 6, treaty benefits, tax treaties, tax avoidance, OECD/G20 BEPS Action Plan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review