The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Amazon soils : a reconnaissance of the soils of the Brazilian Amazon region
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Terra preta soils contain significantly higher nutrient levels than typical Amazonian soils.
“These anthropogenic soil types were usually formed between 500 and 2500 years ago and contain significantly higher nutrient levels than typical Amazonian soils [4,20,23-28].”
From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
Terra preta soils are anthropogenic soil types usually formed between 500 and 2500 years ago.
“These anthropogenic soil types were usually formed between 500 and 2500 years ago and contain significantly higher nutrient levels than typical Amazonian soils [4,20,23-28].”
From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Black Carbon Increases Cation Exchange Capacity in Soils
Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Solomon, D., Kinyangi, J., Grossman, J., O'Neill, B., Skjemstad, J. O., Thies, J., Luizão, F. J., Petersen, J., et al. (2006) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0383 · Cited by 2,191
Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars
Mukherjee, A., Zimmerman, A. R., & Harris, W. (2011) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.021 · Cited by 1,171
One Step Forward toward Characterization: Some Important Material Properties to Distinguish Biochars
Schimmelpfennig, S., & Glaser, B. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0146 · Cited by 518
Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based systems
Haefele, S. M., Konboon, Y., Wongboon, W., Amarante, S., Maarifat, A. A., Pfeiffer, E. M., & Knoblauch, C. (2011) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.014 · Cited by 393
The way forward in biochar research: targeting trade‐offs between the potential wins
Jeffery, S., Bezemer, T. M., Cornelissen, G., Kuyper, T. W., Lehmann, J., Mommer, L., Sohi, S. P., van de Voorde, T. F. J., Wardle, D. A., & van Groenigen, J. W. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12132 · Cited by 305
Jaiswal, A. K., Elad, Y., Graber, E. R., & Frenkel, O. (2014) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.051 · Cited by 203
Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia
McMichael, C. H., Palace, M. W., Bush, M. B., Braswell, B., Hagen, S., Neves, E. G., Silman, M. R., Tamanaha, E. K., & Czarnecki, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2475 · Cited by 179
Biggs, T. W., Dunne, T., & Martinelli, L. A. (2004) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/b:biog.0000025744.78309.2e · Cited by 113
Metadata
- Authors
- Sombroek, W. G.
- Publisher
- Wageningen University and Research
- Published
- 2024
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
