Cited by 15Social Media in Health EducationPharmaceutical industry and healthcareMedical and Health Sciences Research

In the era of social media: is it time to establish a code of online ethical conduct for healthcare professionals?

Open access
Al-Balushi, Amal A·2020·Sultan Qaboos University medical journal

Abstract

Social media is becoming an invasive part of the lives of many professionals including those in the healthcare field. One of the countless implications of such an invasion is how the healthcare professional's engagement with social media affects the traditional doctor-patient relationship. The online presence of professionals should be carefully self-monitored as it affects the individual's reputation and society's perception of their profession. Therefore, the contents of public and personal accounts must differ according to their purpose. In the public eye, conflicts of interest must be declared and scientifically-based medical advice should be clearly differentiated from experience-based advice, personal opinions or commercial advertisements. Online doctor-patient relationships risk the privacy of patients as well as the personal privacy of the healthcare professional. Personal accounts created for friends and family should be kept separate from public accounts created for educational, professional or commercial purposes. Published educational material should be clearly differentiated from commercial material so that it is easier for the public to make an informed decision. This paper proposes a code of online ethical conduct to be implemented in Oman.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.01.004

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Balushi, A. A.
Affiliations
Muscat Directorate of General Health Services, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
Venue
Sultan Qaboos University medical journal
Published
2020-09-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
e25-28
ISSN
  • 2075-051X (ISSN-L)
  • 2075-0528
OpenAlex
W3011629272
Cited by
15
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sultan Qaboos University medical journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
Keywords
social media, healthcare workers, internet ethics, codes of conduct, physician-patient relationship, professional reputation, conflicts of interest, patient privacy, Oman
MeSH terms
Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Oman, Physician-Patient Relations, Privacy, Codes of Ethics, Trust, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review