Cited by 6Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

When the reaper becomes a salesman: The influence of terror management on product preferences

Open access
Van Bommel, Tom, O'Dwyer, Cormac, Zuidgeest, Tim W.M., Poletiek, Fenna H.·2015·Journal of Economic & Financial Studies

Abstract

The present research investigates how consumer choice is affected by Terror Management Theory’s proposition of Mortality Salience increasing one’s cultural worldview defense and self-esteem striving. The study builds empirically upon prior theorizing by Arndt, Solomon, Kasser and Sheldon (2004). During an experiment, we manipulated Mortality Salience and measured product preferences for conspicuousness and familiarity. Participants primed with death were more likely to choose conspicuous products, corroborating previous research of mortality salience raising materialistic tendencies. In addition, participants showed a tendency to prefer familiar brands. These results are in line with the Terror Management Theory framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18533/jefs.v3i05.121

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (Vol. 4). Boston: Pearson Education.
  2. Mandel, N., & Heine, S. J. (1999). Terror management and marketing: He who dies with the most toys wins. Advances in consumer research, 26, 527-532. http://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference- proceedings.aspx?Id=8314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Bommel, T., O'Dwyer, C., Zuidgeest, T. W. M., & Poletiek, F. H.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Economic & Financial Studies
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
3
Issue
05
Pages
33
ISSN
  • 2379-9463 (ISSN-L)
  • 2379-9471
OpenAlex
W2150108500
Cited by
6
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Economic & Financial Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of Economic & Financial Studies - Journal of Economic & Financial Studies (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
terror management theory, mortality salience, consumer choice, product preference, conspicuous consumption, brand familiarity, materialism, self-esteem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review