Cited by 16Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Consumer Culture as Worldview Defense

Fransen, Marieke L., Arendsen, Jolien, Das, Enny·2019·Handbook of Terror Management Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-811844-3.00020-2

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fransen, M. L., Arendsen, J., & Das, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Handbook of Terror Management Theory
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2019
Pages
485-512
OpenAlex
W2911159285
Cited by
16
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
13.72
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
terror management theory, mortality salience, consumerism, worldview defense, materialism, conspicuous consumption, brand preference, consumer behavior, cultural worldview, fear of death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review