The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism
Abstract
A revealing look at how negative biases against women of color are embedded in search engine results and algorithms Run a Google search for “black girls”—what will you find? “Big Booty” and other sexually explicit terms are likely to come up as top search terms. But, if you type in “white girls,” the results are radically different. The suggested porn sites and un-moderated discussions about “why black women are so sassy” or “why black women are so angry” presents a disturbing portrait of black womanhood in modern society. In Algorithms of Oppression , Safiya Umoja Noble challenges the idea that search engines like Google offer an equal playing field for all forms of ideas, identities, and activities. Data discrimination is a real social problem; Noble argues that the combination of private interests in promoting certain sites, along with the monopoly status of a relatively small number of Internet search engines, leads to a biased set of search algorithms that privilege whiteness and discriminate against people of color, specifically women of color. Through an analysis of textual and media searches as well as extensive research on paid online advertising, Noble exposes a culture of racism and sexism in the way discoverability is created online. As search engines and their related companies grow in importance—operating as a source for email, a major vehicle for primary and secondary school learning, and beyond—understanding and reversing these disquieting trends and discriminatory practices is of utmost importance. An original, surprising and, at times, disturbing account of bias on the internet, Algorithms of Oppression contributes to our understanding of how racism is created, maintained, and disseminated in the 21st century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective
Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920953847 · Cited by 1,547
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Lee Cooke, F., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., et al. (2023) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12524 · Cited by 908
The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition
Keyes, O. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274357 · Cited by 505
Algorithmic bias in data-driven innovation in the age of AI
Akter, S., McCarthy, G., Sajib, S., Michael, K., Dwivedi, Y. K., D’Ambra, J., & Shen, K. N. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102387 · Cited by 440
Facial recognition technology in schools: critical questions and concerns
Andrejevic, M., & Selwyn, N. (2020) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1686014 · Cited by 284
Figueroa-Armijos, M., Clark, B. B., & da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05166-2 · Cited by 164
AI auditing: The Broken Bus on the Road to AI Accountability
Birhane, A., Steed, R., Ojewale, V., Vecchione, B., & Raji, I. D. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml59370.2024.00037 · Cited by 158
Lee, M. K., & Rich, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445570 · Cited by 145
Habits and the electronic herd: the psychology behind social media’s successes and failures
Anderson, I. A., & Wood, W. (2021) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1063 · Cited by 108
Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry
McCradden, M., Hui, K., & Buchman, D. Z. (2023) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108447 · Cited by 97
The chilling effects of algorithmic profiling: Mapping the issues
Büchi, M., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A., Velidi, S., & Viljoen, S. (2020) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105367 · Cited by 97
Nonhuman humanitarianism: when 'AI for good' can be harmful
Madianou, M. (2021) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2021.1909100 · Cited by 91
Generative language models exhibit social identity biases
Hu, T., Kyrychenko, Y., Rathje, S., Collier, N., van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00741-1 · Cited by 100
Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence
Owe, A., & Baum, S. D. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00065-0 · Cited by 73
Racism, responsibility and autonomy in HCI: Testing perceptions of an AI agent
Hong, J.-W., & Williams, D. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.012 · Cited by 69
Automating epistemology: how AI reconfigures truth, authority, and verification
Shin, D. (2026) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02560-y · Cited by 57
Michalak, R. (2023) · Journal of Library Administration · doi:10.1080/01930826.2023.2262367 · Cited by 47
James, A., & Whelan, A. (2022) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018320985463 · Cited by 45
Maimela, C., & Mbonde, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2025.1543471 · Cited by 45
Strategic Invisibility: How Creators Manage the Risks and Constraints of Online Hyper(In)Visibility
Stegeman, H. M., Are, C., & Poell, T. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241244674 · Cited by 45
Towards decolonising the ethics of AI in education
Nemorin, S. (2026) · Globalisation, Societies and Education · doi:10.1080/14767724.2024.2333821 · Cited by 41
Chen, R., Lee, V. R., & G Lee, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13350-w · Cited by 43
Warr, M., & Heath, M. K. (2025) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/00224871251325073 · Cited by 35
Igbinovia, M. O., & Mensah Danquah, M. (2025) · Technical Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07317131.2025.2512282 · Cited by 22
Hillo, J., Vento, I., & Erkkilä, T. (2026) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.70028 · Cited by 22
The right to audit and power asymmetries in algorithm auditing
Urman, A., Smirnov, I., & Lasser, J. (2024) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00454-5 · Cited by 12
Milella, F., & Cabitza, F. (2026) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make8020036 · Cited by 11
Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a responsible data science workflow
Stoudt, S., Jernite, Y., Marshall, B., Marwick, B., Sharan, M., Whitaker, K., & Danchev, V. (2024) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012232 · Cited by 11
Organic online politics: Farmers, Facebook, and Myanmar's military coup
Faxon, H. O., Kintzi, K., Tran, V., Wine, K. Z., & Htut, S. Y. (2023) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517231168101 · Cited by 17
AI Voice Methodology: Using Generative AI in Qualitative Social Research
Hughes, J., Homan, L., O’Reilly, M., & Hughes, K. (2025) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/10778004251401842 · Cited by 2
Stevens, N., & Gieseking, J. J. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70046 · Cited by 2
Exploring #Diasporawars on Black Twitter
Musgrave, T., Ye, Y., Toyama, K., Schoenebeck, S., & Threats, M. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251352834 · Cited by 3
Jho, H., Park, C., & Ahn, D. (2026) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2026.2654678 · Cited by 1
Sobo, E. J., Goldberg, D. M., Hauze, S. W., & Frazee, J. P. (2026) · Annals of Anthropological Practice · doi:10.1111/napa.70029 · Cited by 3
Beyond Explanation: Evidentiary Rights for Algorithmic Accountability
Stewart, M. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806532 · Cited by 1
Can AI provenance inform archival provenance?
Corry, F. (2026) · Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society · doi:10.1017/cfc.2026.10025
Policy Silence as Governance: AI Decision-Making, Responsibility, and Risk in K–12 Education
Miles, A. J., & Arar, K. (2026) · Improving Schools · doi:10.1177/13654802261470692
Untitled work
American Psychological Association (n.d.) · American Psychological Association
Metadata
- Authors
- Noble, S. U.
- Venue
- New York University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- New York University Press
- Published
- 2020-05-22
- OpenAlex
- W2999490220
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.