Cited by 108Impact of Technology on AdolescentsInnovative Human-Technology InteractionMedia and Digital Communication

Habits and the electronic herd: the psychology behind social media’s successes and failures

Open access
Anderson, Ian A., Wood, Wendy·2021·Consumer Psychology Review

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

If platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter are the engines of social media use, what is the gasoline? The answer can be found in the psychological dynamics behind consumer habit formation and performance. In fact, the financial success of different social media sites is closely tied to the daily‐use habits they create among users. We explain how the rewards of social media sites motivate user habit formation, how social media design provides cues that automatically activate habits and nudge continued use, and how strong habits hinder quitting social media. Demonstrating that use habits are tied to cues, we report a novel test of a 2008 change in Facebook design, showing that it impeded posting only of frequent, habitual users, suggesting that the change disrupted habit automaticity. Finally, we offer predictions about the future of social media sites, highlighting the features most likely to promote user habits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/arcp.1063

Cites

91 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moving an automized behavior from its accustomed context to a new one usually leads to interference in the behavioral execution.

    “Moving an automized behavior from its accustomed context to a new one usually leads to interference in the behavioral execution.”

    From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Anderson and Wood, 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Anderson I., 2020, Social media habits: When others’ reactions don’t matter
  2. AudienceProject, 2019, Leading Facebook usage reasons according to users in the United States as of 3rd quarter 2019
  3. Digital Information World, 2019, Revealed: The social media platforms that make the most revenue off their users
  4. eMarketer, 2019, Social media activities on select social networks by social media users in the United States in February 2019
  5. eMarketer, 2020, US Social Network Ad Revenues, by Company
  6. Eyal N., 2014, Hooked: How to build habit‐forming products
  7. Hatmaker T., 2020, Changing How Retweets Work, Twitter Seeks to Slow Down Election Misinformation
  8. Jaffray P., 2020, Most popular social networks of teenagers in the United States from fall 2012 to fall 2019 [Graph]
  9. James W., 1890, Principles of psychology
  10. Kim M., 2014, The effects of external cues on media habit and use: Push notification alerts and mobile application usage habits
  11. Köse D. B., 2020, Twenty‐Third Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems 2020 Proceedings, Dubai
  12. Kosslyn J., 2018, The internet needs more friction
  13. Linshi J., 2015, How to stop Facebook from killing your data plan
  14. Malik M. M., 2016, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media, 241
  15. Mediakix, 2019, How many people use Instagram stories?
  16. Newton C., 2016, Why Vine Died
  17. Oh S., 2015, Motivations for sharing information and social support in social media: A comparative analysis of Facebook, Twitter, Delicious, YouTube, and Flickr, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 2045
  18. Ortiz‐Ospina E., 2019, The rise of social media
  19. Perrin A., 2019, Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018
  20. Rhodes L., 2020, The Social Dilemma
  21. Smith A., 2015, U.S. smartphone use in 2015
  22. Snap, Inc., 2019, Apposphere: How frequent social media use impacts your daily life and emotions
  23. Southern M., 2017, Facebook removes ticker news feed for monitoring friends’ activity
  24. Statista, 2020, Why do you use Instagram?
  25. Verpanken B., 2019, The psychology of habit, 189
  26. Vincent J., 2020, Twitter is Bringing its ‘read before you retweet’ prompt to all users
  27. We Are Social, DataReportal, & Hootsuite, 2020, Daily time spent on social networking by internet users worldwide from 2012 to 2019 (in minutes)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, I. A., & Wood, W.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Wood, Wendy
Venue
Consumer Psychology Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-22
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
83-99
ISSN
  • 2476-1273 (ISSN-L)
  • 2476-1281
OpenAlex
W3108514068
Cited by
108
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consumer Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media, habit formation, cues, reward, social media design, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review