Cited by 120Speech and dialogue systemsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningNatural Language Processing Techniques

MuTual: A Dataset for Multi-Turn Dialogue Reasoning

Open access
Cui, Leyang, Wu, Yu, Liu, Shujie, Zhang, Yue, Zhou, Ming·2020·Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Non-task oriented dialogue systems have achieved great success in recent years due to largely accessible conversation data and the development of deep learning techniques.Given a context, current systems are able to yield a relevant and fluent response, but sometimes make logical mistakes because of weak reasoning capabilities.To facilitate the conversation reasoning research, we introduce Mu-Tual, a novel dataset for Multi-Turn dialogue Reasoning, consisting of 8,860 manually annotated dialogues based on Chinese student English listening comprehension exams.Compared to previous benchmarks for non-task oriented dialogue systems, MuTual is much more challenging since it requires a model that can handle various reasoning problems.Empirical results show that state-of-the-art methods only reach 71%, which is far behind the human performance of 94%, indicating that there is ample room for improving reasoning ability.MuTual is available at https://github. com/Nealcly/MuTual. * Contribution during internship at MSRA.M: Ma'am

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.130

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are some reasoning works in the area of dialogue, but few in reducing hallucinations.

    “There are some reasoning works in the area of dialogue [39, 83, 272], but few in reducing hallucinations.”

    From Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Gar- nett, editors, Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems 30, pages 5998-6008.
  2. Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2019. In 7th International Conference on Learning Represen- tations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019. OpenReview.net.
  3. Tom Young, Erik Cambria, Iti Chaturvedi, Hao Zhou, Subham Biswas, and Minlie Huang. 2018. Aug- menting end-to-end dialogue systems with common- sense knowledge. In Proceedings of the Thirty- Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th innovative Applications of Arti- ficial Intelligence (IAAI-18), and the 8th AAAI Sym- posium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intel- ligence (EAAI-18), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 2-7, 2018, pages 4970-4977.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cui, L., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, M.
Affiliations
  • Westlake University (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2020
Pages
1406-1416
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034446185
Cited by
110
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 6
FWCI
8.88
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Westlake University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
dialogue dataset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review