Cited by 274Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpatial Cognition and NavigationReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Grounding

Open access
Ku, Alexander, Anderson, Peter, Patel, Roma, Ie, Eugene, Baldridge, Jason·2020·Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)

Abstract

We introduce Room-Across-Room (RxR), a new Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) dataset.RxR is multilingual (English, Hindi, and Telugu) and larger (more paths and instructions) than other VLN datasets.It emphasizes the role of language in VLN by addressing known biases in paths and eliciting more references to visible entities.Furthermore, each word in an instruction is time-aligned to the virtual poses of instruction creators and validators.We establish baseline scores for monolingual and multilingual settings and multitask learning when including Room-to-Room annotations (Anderson et al., 2018b).We also provide results for a model that learns from synchronized pose traces by focusing only on portions of the panorama attended to in human demonstrations.The size, scope and detail of RxR dramatically expands the frontier for research on embodied language agents in simulated, photo-realistic environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.356

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing vision-and-language navigation datasets face a common data scarcity issue.

    “To tackle the common data scarcity issue in existing vision-and-language navigation datasets”

    From Scaling Data Generation in Vision-and-Language Navigation (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

  • Recent large datasets contain hundreds of interactive scenes and vast human demonstrations, leading to significant improvement in agent performance.

    “recent large datasets which contain hundreds of interactive scenes have been created [20, 66, 84], as well as a vast amount of human demonstrations have been collected [45, 67] for learning visual navigation, leading to significant improvement in agent's performance.”

    From Scaling Data Generation in Vision-and-Language Navigation (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Roee Aharoni, Melvin Johnson, and Orhan Firat. 2019. Massively multilingual neural machine translation. In NAACL-HLT.
  2. Peter Anderson, Angel Chang, Devendra Singh Chap- lot, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Saurabh Gupta, Vladlen Koltun, Jana Kosecka, Jitendra Malik, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Manolis Savva, and Amir R. Zamir. 2018a. On evaluation of embodied navigation agents. arXiv:1807.06757. · arXiv
  3. Peter Anderson, Qi Wu, Damien Teney, Jake Bruce, Mark Johnson, Niko Sünderhauf, Ian Reid, Stephen Gould, and Anton van den Hengel. 2018b. Vision- and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually- grounded navigation instructions in real environ- ments. In CVPR.
  4. Andrea Bender and Sieghard Beller. 2014. Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time: A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cogni- tion, 132(3):342-382.
  5. Emily M. Bender. 2009. Linguistically naïve != lan- guage independent: Why NLP needs linguistic ty- pology. In EACL Workshop on the Interaction be- tween Linguistics and Computational Linguistics: Virtuous, Vicious or Vacuous?
  6. David L Chen and Raymond J Mooney. 2011. Learn- ing to interpret natural language navigation instruc- tions from observations. In AAAI.
  7. Howard Chen, Alane Suhr, Dipendra Misra, Noah Snavely, and Yoav Artzi. 2019. Touchdown: Natural language navigation and spatial reasoning in visual street environments. In CVPR.
  8. Jonathan H. Clark, Eunsol Choi, Michael Collins, Dan Garrette, Tom Kwiatkowski, Vitaly Nikolaev, and Jennimaria Palomaki. 2020. TyDi QA: A bench- mark for information-seeking question answering in typologically diverse languages. TACL.
  9. Daniel BM Haun, Christian J Rapold, Gabriele Janzen, and Stephen C Levinson. 2011. Plasticity of human spatial cognition: Spatial language and cognition co- vary across cultures. Cognition, 119(1):70-80.
  10. Yicong Hong, Cristian Rodriguez-Opazo, Qi Wu, and Stephen Gould. 2020. Sub-instruction aware vision- and-language navigation. In EMNLP.
  11. Gabriel Ilharco, Vihan Jain, Alexander Ku, Eugene Ie, and Jason Baldridge. 2019. Effective and gen- eral evaluation for instruction conditioned naviga- tion using dynamic time warping. NeurIPS Visu- ally Grounded Interaction and Language Workshop (ViGIL).
  12. Vihan Jain, Gabriel Magalhaes, Alexander Ku, Ashish Vaswani, Eugene Ie, and Jason Baldridge. 2019. Stay on the path: Instruction fidelity in vision-and- language navigation. In ACL.
  13. Jacob Krantz, Erik Wijmans, Arjun Majundar, Dhruv Batra, and Stefan Lee. 2020. Beyond the nav-graph: Vision and language navigation in continuous envi- ronments. In ECCV.
  14. Larry Lansing, Vihan Jain, Harsh Mehta, Haoshuo Huang, and Eugene Ie. 2019. VALAN: Vision and language agent navigation. arXiv:1912.03241. · arXiv
  15. Xiujun Li, Chunyuan Li, Qiaolin Xia, Yonatan Bisk, Asli Celikyilmaz, Jianfeng Gao, Noah Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2019. Robust navigation with language pretraining and stochastic sampling. In EMNLP.
  16. Harsh Mehta, Yoav Artzi, Jason Baldridge, Eugene Ie, and Piotr Mirowski. 2020. Retouchdown: Adding touchdown to streetlearn as a shareable re- source for language grounding tasks in street view. EMNLP Workshop on Spatial Language Under- standing (SpLU).
  17. Dipendra Kumar Misra, Andrew Bennett, Valts Blukis, Eyvind Niklasson, Max Shatkhin, and Yoav Artzi. 2018. Mapping instructions to actions in 3d environ- ments with visual goal prediction. In EMNLP.
  18. Edward Munnich, Barbara Landau, and Barbara Anne Dosher. 2001. Spatial language and spatial repre- sentation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cognition, 81(3):171-208.
  19. Zarana Parekh, Jason Baldridge, Daniel Cer, Austin Waters, and Yinfei Yang. 2020. Crisscrossed captions: Extended intramodal and intermodal semantic similarity judgments for MS-COCO. arXiv:2004.15020. · arXiv
  20. Jordi Pont-Tuset, Jasper Uijlings, Soravit Changpinyo, Radu Soricut, and Vittorio Ferrari. 2020. Connect- ing vision and language with localized narratives. In ECCV.
  21. Vineel Pratap, Anuroop Sriram, Paden Tomasello, Awni Hannun, Vitaliy Liptchinsky, Gabriel Syn- naeve, and Ronan Collobert. 2020. Massively multi- lingual asr: 50 languages, 1 model, 1 billion param- eters. arXiv:2007.03001. · arXiv
  22. Yuankai Qi, Qi Wu, Peter Anderson, Xin Wang, William Yang Wang, Chunhua Shen, and Anton van den Hengel. 2020. REVERIE: Remote embod- ied visual referring expression in real indoor environ- ments. In CVPR.
  23. Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, An- drej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, Alexander C. Berg, and Li Fei-Fei. 2015. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. IJCV.
  24. Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Stefan Lee, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin, Shalini Ghosh, Larry Heck, Dhruv Ba- tra, and Devi Parikh. 2019. Taking a hint: Leverag- ing explanations to make vision and language mod- els more grounded. In ICCV.
  25. Piyush Sharma, Nan Ding, Sebastian Goodman, and Radu Soricut. 2018. Conceptual captions: A cleaned, hypernymed, image alt-text dataset for au- tomatic image captioning. In ACL.
  26. Mohit Shridhar, Jesse Thomason, Daniel Gordon, Yonatan Bisk, Winson Han, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Dieter Fox. 2020. ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instruc- tions for Everyday Tasks. In CVPR.
  27. Mingxing Tan and Quoc Le. 2019. Efficientnet: Re- thinking model scaling for convolutional neural net- works. In ICML.
  28. Jesse Thomason, Daniel Gordon, and Yonatan Bisk. 2019a. Shifting the baseline: Single modality per- formance on visual navigation & QA. In NAACL.
  29. Jesse Thomason, Michael Murray, Maya Cakmak, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019b. Vision-and-dialog navi- gation. In CoRL.
  30. Xin Wang, Qiuyuan Huang, Asli Celikyilmaz, Jian- feng Gao, Dinghan Shen, Yuan-Fang Wang, William Yang Wang, and Lei Zhang. 2019. Re- inforced cross-modal matching and self-supervised imitation learning for vision-language navigation. In CVPR.
  31. Xin Wang, Vihan Jain, Eugene Ie, William Yang Wang, Zornitsa Kozareva, and Sujith Ravi. 2020. Environment-agnostic multitask learning for natural language grounded navigation. In ECCV.
  32. Jialin Wu and Raymond Mooney. 2019. Self-critical reasoning for robust visual question answering. In NeurIPS.
  33. Wang Zhu, Hexiang Hu, Jiacheng Chen, Zhiwei Deng, Vihan Jain, Eugene Ie, and Fei Sha. 2020. Baby- Walk: Going farther in vision-and-language naviga- tion by taking baby steps. In ACL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ku, A., Anderson, P., Patel, R., Ie, E., & Baldridge, J.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
Published
2020
Pages
4392-4412
OpenAlex
W3100923070
Cited by
274
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 2
FWCI
8.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
vision-and-language navigation, language grounding, Hindi, Telugu, simulation environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review