The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLP
Open accessAbstract
Douwe Kiela, Max Bartolo, Yixin Nie, Divyansh Kaushik, Atticus Geiger, Zhengxuan Wu, Bertie Vidgen, Grusha Prasad, Amanpreet Singh, Pratik Ringshia, Zhiyi Ma, Tristan Thrush, Sebastian Riedel, Zeerak Waseem, Pontus Stenetorp, Robin Jia, Mohit Bansal, Christopher Potts, Adina Williams. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Datasets are central to evaluating LMs' generative capabilities in NLP [12,25,28,32,49,55].”
From CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These benchmarks, however, are limited to single-turn or short-context scenarios, do not require sequential decision-making or adaptation to changing environments and have been saturating rapidly”
From BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games (2024) · cites this paper as Kiela et al., 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“DynaBench addresses the challenges posed by static standardized benchmarks, such as saturation and overfitting, by emphasizing dynamic data with human-in-the-loop.”
From Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Datasets have long been useful in evaluating LMs in Natural Language Processing (NLP) research [25,32,47,56].”
From CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At the same time, existing benchmarks have become saturated (Kiela et al., 2021; Ott et al., 2022) and fail to capture the frontier of what state-of-the-art LMs can and cannot do.”
From SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues? (2023) · cites this paper as Kiela et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many established benchmarks struggle to keep pace with the advancements in LM performance and have quickly become saturated [91, 14, 70, 58], leading to discrepancies between the models' perceived and actual capabilities [36].”
From SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientists (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
Luong, T., Pham, H., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1166 · Cited by 8,382
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601981516 · Cited by 6,957
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
Self-citationSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
Self-citationUniversal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1031 · Cited by 4,100
Axiomatic attribution for deep networks
Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., & Yan, Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.01365 · Cited by 4,087
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
Bowman, S. R., Angeli, G., Potts, C., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1075 · Cited by 3,377
Self-citationA Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference
Williams, A., Nangia, N., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1101 · Cited by 3,342
Self-citationKnow What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
Self-citationNatural Questions: A benchmark for question answering research
Kwiatkowski, T., Palomaki, J., Redfield, O., Collins, M., Parikh, A., Alberti, C., Epstein, D., Polosukhin, I., Devlin, J., Lee, K., et al. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00276 · Cited by 2,069
Cheap and fast---but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks
Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A. Y. (2008) · Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '08 · doi:10.3115/1613715.1613751 · Cited by 1,887
HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering
Yang, Z., Qi, P., Zhang, S., Bengio, Y., Cohen, W., Salakhutdinov, R., & Manning, C. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1259 · Cited by 1,804
Annotating Expressions of Opinions and Emotions in Language
Wiebe, J., Wilson, T., & Cardie, C. (2005) · Computers and the Humanities · doi:10.1007/s10579-005-7880-9 · Cited by 1,794
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M. J., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 1,698
The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
Dagan, I., Glickman, O., & Magnini, B. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11736790_9 · Cited by 1,674
(2018) · International Conference on Learning Representations · Cited by 1,621
Self-citationAdversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems
Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1215 · Cited by 1,410
Self-citationFEVER: a Large-scale Dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification
Thorne, J., Vlachos, A., Christodoulopoulos, C., & Mittal, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1074 · Cited by 1,343
HotFlip: White-Box Adversarial Examples for Text Classification
Ebrahimi, J., Rao, A., Lowd, D., & Dou, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2006 · Cited by 1,238
Designing games with a purpose
von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1378704.1378719 · Cited by 1,186
SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems
Wang, A., Pruksachatkun, Y., Nangia, N., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.00537 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationRight for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference
McCoy, R. T., Pavlick, E., & Linzen, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1334 · Cited by 944
Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data
Gururangan, S., Swayamdipta, S., Levy, O., Schwartz, R., Bowman, S., & Smith, N. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-2017 · Cited by 907
Beyond accuracy: behavioral testing of NLP models with CheckList
Ribeiro, M. T., Wu, T., Guestrin, C., & Singh, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.442 · Cited by 890
Alm, C. O., Roth, D., & Sproat, R. (2005) · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220648 · Cited by 781
Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding
Nie, Y., Williams, A., Dinan, E., Bansal, M., Weston, J., & Kiela, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.441 · Cited by 656
Self-citationUniversal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLP
Wallace, E., Feng, S., Kandpal, N., Gardner, M., & Singh, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1221 · Cited by 642
(2012) · Cited by 618
Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Belinkov, Y., & Bisk, Y. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.02173 · Cited by 614
The pascal recognising textual entailment challenge
Dagan, I., & Glickman, O. (2005) · Cited by 587
Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inference
Poliak, A., Naradowsky, J., Haldar, A., Rudinger, R., & Durme, B. V. (2018) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-2023 · Cited by 553
Learning to summarize from human feedback
Stiennon, N., Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Ziegler, D. M., Lowe, R., Voss, C., Radford, A., Amodei, D., & Christiano, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.01325 · Cited by 550
Mitchell, T. M., Cohen, W. W., Junior, E. R. H., Talukdar, P. P., Yang, B., Betteridge, J., Carlson, A., Dalvi, B. B., Gardner, M., Kisiel, B., et al. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3191513 · Cited by 549
A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge
Liu, H., Lieberman, H. A., & Selker, T. (2003) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/604045.604067 · Cited by 540
What BERT Is Not: Lessons from a New Suite of Psycholinguistic Diagnostics for Language Models
Ettinger, A. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00298 · Cited by 511
Understanding Abuse: A Typology of Abusive Language Detection Subtasks
Waseem, Z., Davidson, T., Warmsley, D., & Weber, I. G. (2017) · Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-3012 · Cited by 486
Self-citationSentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representations
Conneau, A., & Kiela, D. (2018) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/2gscircifffd · Cited by 477
Self-citationOn Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoders
May, C., Wang, A., Bordia, S., Bowman, S. R., & Rudinger, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1063 · Cited by 461
The Natural Language Decathlon: Multitask Learning as Question Answering
McCann, B., Keskar, N. S., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.08730 · Cited by 448
CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models
Nangia, N., Vania, C., Bhalerao, R., & Bowman, S. R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.154 · Cited by 446
Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution
Rudinger, R., Naradowsky, J., Leonard, B., & Van Durme, B. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-2002 · Cited by 443
Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamics
Swayamdipta, S., Schwartz, R., Lourie, N., Wang, Y., Hajishirzi, H., Smith, N. A., & Choi, Y. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.746 · Cited by 438
Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented DataPreprint
Kaushik, D., Hovy, E. H., & Lipton, Z. C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.12434 · Cited by 434
Self-citationDROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs
Dua, D., Wang, Y., Dasigi, P., Stanovsky, G., Singh, S., & Gardner, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1246 · Cited by 393 · cited 2×
“…QA, and are looking to expand this to include unanswerable questions (Rajpurkar et al., 2018), longer and more complex passages, Yes/No questions and multi-span answers (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), and numbers, dates and spans from the question (Dua et al., 2019) as model performance progresses.”
BackgroundResources and benchmark corpora for hate speech detection: a systematic review
Poletto, F., Basile, V., Sanguinetti, M., Bosco, C., & Patti, V. (2020) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09502-8 · Cited by 387
Directions in abusive language training data, a systematic review: Garbage in, garbage out
Vidgen, B., & Derczynski, L. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243300 · Cited by 369
Self-citationEvaluating Models’ Local Decision Boundaries via Contrast Sets
Gardner, M., Artzi, Y., Basmov, V., Berant, J., Bogin, B., Chen, S., Dasigi, P., Dua, D., Elazar, Y., Gottumukkala, A., et al. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.117 · Cited by 323
Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferences
Glockner, M., Shwartz, V., & Goldberg, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2103 · Cited by 319
Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language InferencePreprint
Naik, A., Ravichander, A., Sadeh, N., Rosé, C. P., & Neubig, G. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.00692 · Cited by 302
(2013) · Cited by 290
HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Models
Röttger, P., Vidgen, B., Nguyen, D., Waseem, Z., Margetts, H. Z., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.4 · Cited by 287
Self-citation(2018) · International Conference on Learning Representations · Cited by 285
Everingham, M., Zisserman, A., Williams, C. K. I., Gool, L. V., Allan, M., Bishop, C., Chapelle, O., Dalal, N., Deselaers, T., Dorkó, G., et al. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11736790 · Cited by 226
Challenges and frontiers in abusive content detection
Vidgen, B., Harris, A., Nguyen, D., Tromble, R., Hale, S. A., & Margetts, H. Z. (2019) · Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3509 · Cited by 217
Self-citationLearning The Difference That Makes A Difference With Counterfactually-Augmented Data
Kaushik, D., Hovy, E. H., & Lipton, Z. C. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Representations · Cited by 174
Self-citationLearning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detection
Vidgen, B., Thrush, T., Waseem, Z., & Kiela, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.132 · Cited by 174
Self-citationOn Adversarial Examples for Character-Level Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Ebrahimi, J., Lowd, D., & Dou, D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.09030 · Cited by 172
On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translation
Khayrallah, H., & Koehn, P. (2018) · Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) · Cited by 168
Learning from Dialogue after Deployment: Feed Yourself, Chatbot!
Hancock, B., Bordes, A., Mazare, P.-E., & Weston, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1358 · Cited by 161
Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attack
Dinan, E., Humeau, S., Chintagunta, B., & Weston, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1461 · Cited by 161
COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretation
Kim, N., & Linzen, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.731 · Cited by 153
How Can We Accelerate Progress Towards Human-like Linguistic Generalization?
Linzen, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.465 · Cited by 148
Utility is in the Eye of the User: A Critique of NLP Leaderboards
Ethayarajh, K., & Jurafsky, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.393 · Cited by 147
Question and Answer Test-Train Overlap in Open-Domain Question Answering Datasets
Lewis, P., Stenetorp, P., & Riedel, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.86 · Cited by 145
Self-citationCrowdsourcing and language studies: the new generation of linguistic data
Munro, R., Bethard, S. J., Kuperman, V., Lai, V. T., Melnick, R., Potts, C., Schnoebelen, T., & Tily, H. J. (2010) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · Cited by 144
Self-citationPerformance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailment
Tsuchiya, M. (2018) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/26mjmiipm2qf · Cited by 130
Do Neural Dialog Systems Use the Conversation History Effectively? An Empirical Study
Sankar, C., Subramanian, S., Pal, C., Chandar, S., & Bengio, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1004 · Cited by 128
Dangerous Speech and Dangerous Ideology: An Integrated Model for Monitoring and Prevention
Maynard, J. L., & Benesch, S. (2016) · Genocide Studies and Prevention · doi:10.5038/1911-9933.9.3.1317 · Cited by 116
Investigating BERT’s Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs
Warstadt, A., Cao, Y. H., Grosu, I., Peng, W., Blix, H., Nie, Y., Alsop, A., Bordia, S., Liu, H., Parrish, A., et al. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1286 · Cited by 105
Self-citationBeat the Machine: Challenging Humans to Find a Predictive Model's “Unknown Unknowns”
Attenberg, J., Ipeirotis, P., & Provost, F. (2015) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/2700832 · Cited by 103
Beat the ai: Investigating adversarial human annotation for reading comprehension
Bartolo, M., Roberts, A., Welbl, J., Riedel, S., & Stenetorp, P. (2020) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 102
Self-citationAre Natural Language Inference Models IMPPRESsive? Learning IMPlicature and PRESupposition
Jeretič, P., Warstadt, A., Bhooshan, S., & Williams, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.768 · Cited by 101
Self-citationInoculation by Fine-Tuning: A Method for Analyzing Challenge Datasets
Liu, N. F., Schwartz, R., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1225 · Cited by 87
Adversarially Regularising Neural
Minervini, P., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k18-1007 · Cited by 85
Self-citationWith Little Power Comes Great Responsibility
Card, D., Henderson, P., Khandelwal, U., Jia, R., Mahowald, K., & Jurafsky, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.745 · Cited by 84
Self-citationRecognition of Affect, Judgment, and Appreciation in Text
Neviarouskaya, A., Prendinger, H., & Ishizuka, M. (2010) · Cited by 79
Towards Linguistically Generalizable NLP Systems: A Workshop and Shared Task
Ettinger, A., Rao, S., Daumé, H., & Bender, E. M. (2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-5401 · Cited by 78
The Dialogue Dodecathlon: Open-Domain Knowledge and Image Grounded Conversational Agents
Shuster, K., Da, J. U., Roller, S., Dinan, E., Boureau, Y.-L., & Weston, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.222 · Cited by 78
An Analysis of Natural Language Inference Benchmarks through the Lens of Negation
Hossain, M. M., Kovatchev, V., Dutta, P., Kao, T. H., Wei, E., & Blanco, E. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.732 · Cited by 77
Analyzing Compositionality-Sensitivity of NLI Models
Nie, Y., Wang, Y., & Bansal, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016867 · Cited by 76
Self-citationDon’t Take the Premise for Granted: Mitigating Artifacts in Natural Language Inference
Belinkov, Y., Poliak, A., Shieber, S., Van Durme, B., & Rush, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1084 · Cited by 73
A brief history of natural logic
van Benthem, J. (2008) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 67
Assessing the Benchmarking Capacity of Machine Reading Comprehension Datasets
Sugawara, S., Stenetorp, P., Inui, K., & Aizawa, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6422 · Cited by 63
Self-citationSyntaxGym: An Online Platform for Targeted Evaluation of Language Models
Gauthier, J., Hu, J., Wilcox, E., Qian, P., & Levy, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.10 · Cited by 61
A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge
Liu, H., Lieberman, H. A., & Selker, T. (2003) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/604050.604067 · Cited by 60
Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformers
Yu, L., & Ettinger, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.397 · Cited by 58
DynaSent: A Dynamic Benchmark for Sentiment Analysis
Potts, C., Wu, Z., Geiger, A., & Kiela, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.186 · Cited by 56
Self-citationNijkamp, P. J., & Suzuki, S. (2009) · Spatial Economic Analysis · doi:10.1080/17421770903114687 · Cited by 52
Towards Ecologically Valid Research on Language User InterfacesPreprint
de Vries, H., Bahdanau, D., & Manning, C. D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.14435 · Cited by 49
Diversify Your Datasets: Analyzing Generalization via Controlled Variance in Adversarial Datasets
Rozen, O., Shwartz, V., Aharoni, R., & Dagan, I. (2019) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k19-1019 · Cited by 35
Huang, W., Liu, H., & Bowman, S. R. (2020) · Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP (Insights) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.insights-1.13 · Cited by 35
Lexicosyntactic Inference in Neural Models
White, A. S., Rudinger, R., Rawlins, K., & Durme, B. V. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1501 · Cited by 34
ConjNLI: Natural Language Inference Over Conjunctive Sentences
Saha, S., Nie, Y., & Bansal, M. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.661 · Cited by 33
Self-citationThe Curse of Performance Instability in Analysis Datasets: Consequences, Source, and Suggestions
Zhou, X., Nie, Y., Tan, H., & Bansal, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.659 · Cited by 32
Self-citationBLiMP: the benchmark of linguistic minimal pairs for English
Warstadt, A., Parrish, A., Liu, H., Mohananey, A., Peng, W., Wang, S.-F., & Bowman, S. R. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00321 · Cited by 28
Harnessing the linguistic signal to predict scalar inferences
Schuster, S., Chen, Y., & Degen, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.479 · Cited by 27
Stress-Testing Neural Models of Natural Language Inference with Multiply-Quantified SentencesPreprint
Geiger, A., Cases, I., Karttunen, L., & Potts, C. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.13033 · Cited by 25
Self-citationMastering the Dungeon: Grounded Language Learning by Mechanical Turker DescentPreprint
Yang, Z., Zhang, S., Urbanek, J., Feng, W., Miller, A., Szlam, A. D., Kiela, D., & Weston, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.07950 · Cited by 22
Self-citationSentiment expression conditioned by affective transitions and social forces
Sudhof, M., Emilsson, A. G., Maas, A. L., & Potts, C. (2014) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623687 · Cited by 19
Self-citationThe Universal Decompositional Semantics Dataset and Decomp ToolkitPreprint
White, A. S., Stengel-Eskin, E., Vashishtha, S., Govindarajan, V. S., Reisinger, D. A., Vieira, T., Sakaguchi, K., Zhang, S., Ferraro, F., Rudinger, R., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13016/m2fhz1-knec · Cited by 14
Huang, W., Liu, H., & Bowman, S. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04762 · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Michael Chen, Mike D'Arcy, Alisa Liu, Jared Fernandez, and Doug Downey. 2019. CODAH: An adversarially-authored question answering dataset for common sense. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Evaluating Vector Space Representations for NLP , pages 63-69, Minneapolis, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog , 1(8):9.
- Victor Sánchez Valencia. 1991. Studies on natural logic and categorial grammar, University of Amsterdam Ph. D . Ph.D. thesis, thesis.
- Bertie Vidgen and Leon Derczynski. 2020. Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Out. arXiv:2004.01670 , pages 1-26. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3641289 · Cited by 4,254
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Self-citationA Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges
Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3140175 · Cited by 2,046
Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E. P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05685 · Cited by 1,888
“Notably, DynaBench [21], a research platform dedicated to dynamic data collection and benchmarking, aligns with our spirit.”
BackgroundSelf-citationUnleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models
CHEN, B. ‐., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260 · Cited by 1,097
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiela, D., Bartolo, M., Nie, Y., Kaushik, D., Geiger, A., Wu, Z., Vidgen, B., Prasad, G., Singh, A., Ringshia, P., Ma, Z., Thrush, T., Riedel, S., Waseem, Z., Stenetorp, P., Jia, R., Bansal, M., Potts, C., & Williams, A.
- Affiliations
- Meta (United Kingdom) (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 4110-4124
- OpenAlex
- W3157225713
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 25
- FWCI
- 21.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001, N66001-19-2-4031, N66001-19)
- Office of Naval Research (N000141812871, N00014-18, ONR-N00014, N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- benchmarking, natural language processing, benchmark design, evaluation metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review