Cited by 163Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningSpeech and dialogue systemsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attack

Open access
Dinan, Emily, Humeau, Samuel, Chintagunta, Bharath, Weston, Jason·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)

Abstract

Emily Dinan, Samuel Humeau, Bharath Chintagunta, Jason Weston. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/d19-1461

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent methodologies demonstrate a significant reduction in explicit bias and toxicity within model outputs, primarily by leveraging the models' ability to identify such undesirable behaviors upon inquiry.

    “Recent methodologies demonstrate a significant reduction in explicit bias and toxicity within model outputs (Dinan et al. 2019; Bai et al. 2022; Ganguli et al. 2023), primarily by leveraging the models' ability to identify such undesirable behaviors upon inquiry.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinan, E., Humeau, S., Chintagunta, B., & Weston, J.
Affiliations
  • Meta (Israel) (IL)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)
Published
2019
Pages
4536-4545
OpenAlex
W2969117066
Cited by
161
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
adversarial attacks, robustness, chatbots, adversarial training, dialogue systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review