Cited by 758Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embedding

Open access
Feng, Fangxiaoyu, Yang, Yinfei, Cer, Daniel, Arivazhagan, Naveen, Wang, Wei·2022·Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

While BERT is an effective method for learning monolingual sentence embeddings for semantic similarity and embedding based transfer learning (Reimers and Gurevych, 2019), BERT based cross-lingual sentence embeddings have yet to be explored.We systematically investigate methods for learning multilingual sentence embeddings by combining the best methods for learning monolingual and cross-lingual representations including: masked language modeling (MLM), translation language modeling (TLM) (Conneau and Lample, 2019), dual encoder translation ranking (Guo et al., 2018), and additive margin softmax (Yang et al., 2019a).We show that introducing a pre-trained multilingual language model dramatically reduces the amount of parallel training data required to achieve good performance by 80%.Composing the best of these methods produces a model that achieves 83.7% bi-text retrieval accuracy over 112 languages on Tatoeba, well above the 65.5% achieved by Artetxe and Schwenk (2019b), while still performing competitively on monolingual transfer learning benchmarks (Conneau and Kiela, 2018).Parallel data mined from CommonCrawl using our best model is shown to train competitive NMT models for en-zh and en-de.We publicly release our best multilingual sentence embedding model for 109+ languages at https://tfhub.dev/ google/LaBSE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.62

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Daniel Cer, Mona Diab, Eneko Agirre, Iñigo Lopez- Gazpio, and Lucia Specia. 2017. SemEval-2017 task 1: Semantic textual similarity multilingual and crosslingual focused evaluation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017), pages 1-14, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Muthuraman Chidambaram, Yinfei Yang, Daniel Cer, Steve Yuan, Yun-Hsuan Sung, Brian Strope, and Ray Kurzweil. 2018. Learning cross-lingual sentence representations via a multi-task dual-encoder model. CoRR, abs/1810.12836. · arXiv
  3. Alexis Conneau, Douwe Kiela, Holger Schwenk, Loïc Barrault, and Antoine Bordes. 2017. Supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat- ural Language Processing, pages 670-680, Copen- hagen, Denmark. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  4. William Dolan, Chris Quirk, Chris Brockett, and Bill Dolan. 2004. Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: Exploiting massively parallel news sources. International Conference on Compu- tational Linguistics.
  5. Lajanugen Logeswaran and Honglak Lee. 2018. An ef- ficient framework for learning sentence representa- tions. In International Conference on Learning Rep- resentations (ICLR).
  6. Holger Schwenk, Guillaume Wenzek, Sergey Edunov, E. Grave, and Armand Joulin. 2019. Ccmatrix: Min- ing billions of high-quality parallel sentences on the web. ArXiv, abs/1911.04944. · arXiv
  7. Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra Birch. 2016. Neural machine translation of rare words with subword units. In Proceedings of the 54th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1715- 1725, Berlin, Germany. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, F., Yang, Y., Cer, D., Arivazhagan, N., & Wang, W.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2022
Pages
878-891
ISSN
0736-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039695075
Cited by
758
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
76.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
multilingual sentence embeddings, BERT, masked language modeling, transfer learning, parallel data, multilingual language models, Chinese-English machine translation, Tatoeba, Common Crawl

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review