Cited by 32Mental Health via WritingSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningNatural Language Processing Techniques

Learning to automate follow-up question generation using process knowledge for depression triage on reddit posts

Open access
Gupta, Shrey, Agarwal, Anmol, Gaur, Manas, Roy, Kaushik, Narayanan, Vignesh, Kumaraguru, Ponnurangam, Sheth, Amit·2022·Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Shrey Gupta, Anmol Agarwal, Manas Gaur, Kaushik Roy, Vignesh Narayanan, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Amit Sheth. Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology. 2022.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.clpsych-1.12

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Semantic enhancements in VMHA with clinical knowledge and associated guidelines, if they remain under-explored, may miss the hidden mental states in a given narrative, which is an essential component of question generation.

    “We argue that semantic enhancements in VMHA with clinical knowledge and associated guidelines, if they remain under-explored, may miss the hidden mental states in a given narrative which is an essential component of question generation (Gaur et al., 2022a; Gupta et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rongyao Huang. 2015. Language use in teenage crisis intervention and the immediate outcome: A machine automated analysis of large scale text data. Ph.D. thesis, Master's thesis, Columbia University.
  2. Kurt Kroenke, Robert L Spitzer, and Janet BW Williams. 2001. The phq-9: validity of a brief depression sever- ity measure. Journal of general internal medicine, 16(9):606-613.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, S., Agarwal, A., Gaur, M., Roy, K., Narayanan, V., Kumaraguru, P., & Sheth, A.
Affiliations
  • International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad (IN)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology
Published
2022
Pages
137-147
OpenAlex
W4287887338
Cited by
27
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2133842)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
follow-up question generation, Reddit posts, process knowledge, automated triage, mental health screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review