Cited by 22Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Mental Health via WritingMachine Learning in Healthcare

A cross attention approach to diagnostic explainability using clinical practice guidelines for depression

Open access
Dalal, Sumit, Tilwani, Deepa, Gaur, Manas, Jain, Sarika, Shalin, Valerie L., Sheth, Amit P.·2025·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The lack of explainability in using relevant clinical knowledge hinders the adoption of artificial intelligence-powered analysis of unstructured clinical dialogue. A wealth of relevant, untapped Mental Health (MH) data is available in online communities, providing the opportunity to address the explainability problem with substantial potential impact as a screening tool for both online and offline applications. Inspired by how clinicians rely on their expertise when interacting with patients, we leverage relevant clinical knowledge to classify and explain depression-related data, reducing manual review time and engendering trust. We developed a method to enhance attention in contemporary transformer models and generate explanations for classifications that are understandable by mental health practitioners (MHPs) by incorporating external clinical knowledge. We propose a domain-general architecture called ProcesS knowledgeinfused cross ATtention (PSAT) that incorporates clinical practice guidelines (CPG) when computing attention. We transform a CPG resource focused on depression, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire (e.g. PHQ-9) and related questions, into a machine-readable ontology using SNOMED-CT. With this resource, PSAT enhances the ability of models like GPT-3.5 to generate application-relevant explanations. Evaluation of four expert-curated datasets related to depression demonstrates PSAT's applicationrelevant explanations. PSAT surpasses the performance of twelve baseline models and can provide explanations where other baselines fall short.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2024.3483577

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Semantic similarity metrics such as BERTScore and domain-specific variants using ClinicalBERT or SciBERT embeddings assess meaning preservation beyond surface forms.

    “Semantic similarity metrics such as BERTScore [132] and domainspecific variants using ClinicalBERT [133] or SciBERT embeddings assess meaning preservation beyond surface forms [65,67,70,90,111].”
  • A first group anchors generated explanations directly to questionnaire items or diagnostic criteria, so that each rationale element traces back to a recognized clinical entry.

    “A first group anchors generated explanations directly to questionnaire items or diagnostic criteria, so that each rationale element traces back to a recognized clinical entry such as the Beck Depression Inventory and the DSM-5 [68,71], the PHQ-9 [70], and standardized psychological scales as a class [115].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalal, S., Tilwani, D., Gaur, M., Jain, S., Shalin, V. L., & Sheth, A. P.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra (IN)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Wright State University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2025-02
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
1333-1342
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4403510466
Cited by
19
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF EAGER (2335967)
  • UMBC SURFF Award
  • University Grant Commission
  • India
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
cross-attention, depression, transformer models, attention mechanism, online mental health communities, PHQ-9, SNOMED CT, knowledge graphs, GPT-3.5, mental health screening, explainable AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review