Cited by 31Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Multimodal large language models for inclusive collaboration learning tasks

Open access
Lewis, Armanda·2022·Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Student Research Workshop

Abstract

This PhD project leverages advancements in multimodal large language models to build an inclusive collaboration feedback loop, in order to facilitate the automated detection, modeling, and feedback for participants developing general collaboration skills.This topic is important given the role of collaboration as an essential 21st century skill, the potential to ground large language models within learning theory and real-world practice, and the expressive potential of transformer models to support equity and inclusion.We address some concerns of integrating advances in natural language processing into downstream tasks such as the learning analytics feedback loop.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-srw.26

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • chatAPIs can be used to facilitate collaboration among students, for instance by creating student groups.

    “Another advantage of chatAPIs is that they can be used to facilitate collaboration among students.For instance, chatAPIs can be used to create student groups, allowing students to work together on projects and assignments (Lewis, 2022).”

    From Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2024) · cites this paper as Lewis, 2022

    Section 4.3 (page unavailable) proposes an intelligent agent that gives students feedback during collaborative work, supporting the general idea of technology-assisted collaboration. It does not describe chatAPIs creating student groups; the groups in its proposed experiment are randomly assigned. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, A.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Lewis, Armanda
Venue
Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Student Research Workshop
Published
2022
Pages
202-210
OpenAlex
W4287889570
Cited by
30
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6
FWCI
8.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop (NAACL SRW) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
multimodal large language models, inclusive learning, collaboration skills, automated feedback, learning analytics, educational equity, transformer models, learning theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review