Cited by 21Topic ModelingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Language Models are Surprisingly Fragile to Drug Names in Biomedical Benchmarks

Open access
Gallifant, Jack, Chen, Shan, Moreira, Pedro José Ferreira, Munch, Nikolaj, Gao, Mingye, Pond, Jackson, Celi, Leo Anthony, Aerts, Hugo, Hartvigsen, Thomas, Bitterman, Danielle·2024·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024

Abstract

, to evaluate performance differences on medical benchmarks after swapping brand and generic drug names using physician expert annotations. We assess both open-source and API-based LLMs on MedQA and MedMCQA, revealing a consistent performance drop ranging from 1-10%. Furthermore, we identify a potential source of this fragility as the contamination of test data in widely used pre-training datasets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.726

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Arefyev Nikolay, Sheludko Boris, Podolskiy Alexander, and Panchenko Alexander. 2020. Always keep your target in mind: Studying semantics and improving performance of neural lexical substitution. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 1242– 1255, Barcelona, Spain (Online). International Committee on Computational Linguistics.
  2. Brown Tom, Mann Benjamin, Ryder Nick, Subbiah Melanie, Jared D Kaplan Prafulla Dhariwal, Neelakantan Arvind, Shyam Pranav, Sastry Girish, Askell Amanda, 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33: 1877– 1901.
  3. Han Tessa, Kumar Aounon, Agarwal Chirag, and Lakkaraju Himabindu. 2024. Towards safe large language models for medicine. Preprint, arXiv:2403.03744. · arXiv
  4. Jin Di, Pan Eileen, Oufattole Nassim, Weng Wei-Hung, Fang Hanyi, and Szolovits Peter. 2020. What disease does this patient have? a large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13081. · arXiv
  5. Jin Qiao, Dhingra Bhuwan, Liu Zhengping, Cohen William, and Lu Xinghua. 2019. PubMedQA: A dataset for biomedical research question answering. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 2567– 2577, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. Liu Junling, Zhou Peilin, Hua Yining, Chong Dading, Tian Zhongyu, Liu Andrew, Wang Helin, You Chenyu, Guo Zhenhua, Lei Zhu, and Li Michael Lingzhi 2023. Benchmarking large language models on CMExam - a comprehensive chinese medical exam dataset. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track.
  7. Raffel Colin, Shazeer Noam, Roberts Adam, Lee Katherine, Narang Sharan, Matena Michael, Zhou Yanqi, Li Wei, and Liu Peter J. 2019. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. arXiv e-prints.
  8. Recht Benjamin, Roelofs Rebecca, Schmidt Ludwig, and Shankar Vaishaal. 2019. Do imagenet classifiers generalize to imagenet? In International conference on machine learning, pages 5389– 5400. PMLR.
  9. Riedl Martin, Glass Michael, and Gliozzo Alfio. 2014. Lexical substitution for the medical domain. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 610– 614, Doha, Qatar. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  10. Soldaini Luca, Kinney Rodney, Bhagia Akshita, Schwenk Dustin, Atkinson David, Authur Russell, Bogin Ben, Chandu Khyathi, Dumas Jennifer, Elazar Yanai, Hofmann Valentin, Ananya Harsh Jha Sachin Kumar, Lucy Li, Lyu Xinxi, Lambert Nathan, Magnusson Ian, Morrison Jacob, Muennighoff Niklas, Naik Aakanksha, Nam Crystal, Peters Matthew E., Ravichander Abhilasha, Richardson Kyle, Shen Zejiang, Strubell Emma, Subramani Nishant, Tafjord Oyvind, Walsh Pete, Zettlemoyer Luke, Smith Noah A., Hajishirzi Hannaneh, Beltagy Iz, Groeneveld Dirk, Dodge Jesse, and Lo Kyle. 2024. Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Research. arXiv preprint.
  11. Wen Zhi, Lu Xing Han, and Reddy Siva. 2020. MeDAL: Medical abbreviation disambiguation dataset for natural language understanding pretraining. In Proceedings of the 3rd Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop, pages 130– 135, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  12. Yuret Deniz. 2007. KU: Word sense disambiguation by substitution. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007), pages 207– 214, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. Zhou Wangchunshu, Ge Tao, Xu Ke, Wei Furu, and Zhou Ming. 2019. BERT-based lexical substitution. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 3368– 3373, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gallifant, J., Chen, S., Moreira, P. J. F., Munch, N., Gao, M., Pond, J., Celi, L. A., Aerts, H., Hartvigsen, T., & Bitterman, D.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Bitterman, Danielle
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024
Published
2024
Volume
2024
Pages
12448-12465
OpenAlex
W4404781405
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2
FWCI
5.61
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2148451)
  • European Commission
  • National Institutes of Health (OT2OD032701, Bridge2AI, 5r01eb017205-07, R35CA22052, R01-EB017205)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA190234, U24CA194354, U54CA274516, R01CA294033, U01CA209414)
  • Fogarty International Center (U54TW012043)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01-EB017205)
  • H2020 European Research Council (866504)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
drug names, MedQA, MedMCQA, medical question answering, pre-training dataset, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review