Cited by 615Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsMachine Learning in Healthcare

The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models

Open access
Gallifant, Jack, Afshar, Majid, Ameen, Saleem, Aphinyanaphongs, Yindalon, Chen, Shan, Cacciamani, Giovanni, Demner-Fushman, Dina, Dligach, Dmitriy +17 more·2025·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted in healthcare, necessitating standardized reporting guidelines. We present transparent reporting of a multivariable model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD)-LLM, an extension of the TRIPOD + artificial intelligence statement, addressing the unique challenges of LLMs in biomedical applications. TRIPOD-LLM provides a comprehensive checklist of 19 main items and 50 subitems, covering key aspects from title to discussion. The guidelines introduce a modular format accommodating various LLM research designs and tasks, with 14 main items and 32 subitems applicable across all categories. Developed through an expedited Delphi process and expert consensus, TRIPOD-LLM emphasizes transparency, human oversight and task-specific performance reporting. We also introduce an interactive website (https://tripod-llm.vercel.app/) facilitating easy guideline completion and PDF generation for submission. As a living document, TRIPOD-LLM will evolve with the field, aiming to enhance the quality, reproducibility and clinical applicability of LLM research in healthcare through comprehensive reporting. TRIPOD-LLM (transparent reporting of a multivariable model for individual prognosis or diagnosis–large language model) is a checklist of items considered essential for good reporting of studies that are developing or evaluating an LLM for use in healthcare settings. It is a ‘living guideline’ that emphasizes transparency, human oversight and task-specific performance reporting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-024-03425-5

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [34]Living systematic reviews | Cochrane Community. https://community.cochrane.org/review-development/resources/living-systematic-reviews.
  2. [64]Yoon W LCD Benchmark: Long Clinical Document Benchmark on Mortality Prediction. 2024.03.26.24304920 Preprint at 10.1101/2024.03.26.24304920 (2024). PMC11756648 39602813 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallifant, J., Afshar, M., Ameen, S., Aphinyanaphongs, Y., Chen, S., Cacciamani, G., Demner-Fushman, D., Dligach, D., Daneshjou, R., Fernandes, C., Hansen, L. H., Landman, A., Lehmann, L., McCoy, L. G., Miller, T., Moreno, A., Munch, N., Restrepo, D., Savova, G., Umeton, R., Gichoya, J. W., Collins, G. S., Moons, K. G. M., Celi, L. A., & Bitterman, D. S.
Affiliations
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Mass General Brigham (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Universidad del Cauca (CO)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bitterman, Danielle S.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2025-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
60-69
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4406152263
Cited by
615
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 458 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 2
FWCI
36.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1928614, 2129076)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Radiological Society of North America (#EIHD2204)
  • Cancer Research UK (C49297/A27294)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (C49297/A27294)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • National Institutes of Health (OT2OD032701, 75N92020C00021, 5r01eb017205-07, 75N92020C00008, R01-EB017205, UL1TR001445)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/Y018516/1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (75N92020C00008, 75N92020C00021, R01HL167811)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA274516, R01CA294033)
  • Fogarty International Center (U54TW012043)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01-EB017205)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM013486)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
large language models, reporting guidelines, diagnostic model, artificial intelligence in healthcare, transparency, human oversight, reproducibility, living guidelines, Delphi consensus
MeSH terms
Large Language Models, Artificial Intelligence, Delphi Technique, Humans, Prognosis, Research Design, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review