Cited by 15Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs through Medical Verifiable Problems

Open access
Chen, Junying, Cai, Zhenyang, Ji, Ke, Wang, Xidong, Liu, Wanlong, Wang, Rongsheng, Wang, Benyou·2025·Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025

Abstract

The breakthrough of OpenAI o1 highlights the potential of enhancing reasoning to improve LLM.Yet, most research in reasoning has focused on mathematical tasks, leaving domains like medicine underexplored.The medical domain, though distinct from mathematics, also demands robust reasoning to provide reliable answers, given the high standards of healthcare.However, verifying medical reasoning is challenging, unlike those in mathematics.To address this, we propose Medical Verifiable Problems with a medical verifier to check the correctness of model outputs.This verifiable nature enables advancements in medical reasoning through a two-stage approach: (1) using the verifier to guide the search for a complex reasoning trajectory for fine-tuning LLMs, (2) applying reinforcement learning (RL) with verifier-based rewards to enhance complex reasoning further.Finally, we introduce HuatuoGPT-o1, a medical LLM capable of complex reasoning, which outperforms general and medical-specific baselines using only 40K verifiable problems.Experiments show complex reasoning improves medical problem-solving and benefits more from RL.We hope our approach inspires advancements in reasoning across medical and other specialized domains.Code, datasets, and models are publicly available at https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/Huatuo GPT-o1.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.751

Cites

0 citation errors · 5 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Sina Alemohammad, Josue Casco-Rodriguez, Lorenzo Luzi, Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Hossein Babaei, Daniel LeJeune, Ali Siahkoohi, and Richard G. Bara- niuk. 2024. Self-consuming generative models go MAD. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Aus- tria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net.
  2. Daixuan Cheng, Shaohan Huang, and Furu Wei. 2023. Adapting large language models via reading compre- hension. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  3. Zi-Yi Dou, Cheng-Fu Yang, Xueqing Wu, Kai-Wei Chang, and Nanyun Peng. 2024. Re-rest: Reflection- reinforced self-training for language agents. In Pro- ceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Meth- ods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2024, Miami, FL, USA, November 12-16, 2024, pages 15394-15411. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.
  4. Alexander Havrilla, Sharath Chandra Raparthy, Christo- foros Nalmpantis, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Maksym Zhu- ravinskyi, Eric Hambro, and Roberta Raileanu. 2024. Glore: When, where, and how to improve LLM rea- soning via global and local refinements. In Forty- first International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27, 2024. Open- Review.net.
  5. Jie Huang, Xinyun Chen, Swaroop Mishra, Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Adams Wei Yu, Xiny- ing Song, and Denny Zhou. 2024. Large language models cannot self-correct reasoning yet. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net.
  6. Di Jin, Eileen Pan, Nassim Oufattole, Wei-Hung Weng, Hanyi Fang, and Peter Szolovits. 2021. What disease does this patient have? a large-scale open domain question answering dataset from medical exams. Ap- plied Sciences, 11(14):6421.
  7. Hunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harri- son Edwards, Bowen Baker, Teddy Lee, Jan Leike, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Karl Cobbe. 2024. Let's verify step by step. In The Twelfth In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. Open- Review.net.
  8. Junling Liu, Peilin Zhou, Yining Hua, Dading Chong, Zhongyu Tian, Andrew Liu, Helin Wang, Chenyu You, Zhenhua Guo, Lei Zhu, et al. 2024. Bench- marking large language models on cmexam-a com- prehensive chinese medical exam dataset. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.
  9. Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, Shashank Gupta, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Katherine Hermann, Sean Welleck, Amir Yazdan- bakhsh, and Peter Clark. 2023. Self-refine: Itera- tive refinement with self-feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Sys- tems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 10 -16, 2023.
  10. Ankit Pal, Logesh Kumar Umapathi, and Malaikan- nan Sankarasubbu. 2022a. Medmcqa: A large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical do- main question answering. In Conference on health, inference, and learning, pages 248-260.
  11. PMLR.
  12. Ankit Pal, Logesh Kumar Umapathi, and Malaikan- nan Sankarasubbu. 2022b. Medmcqa: A large-scale multi-subject multi-choice dataset for medical do- main question answering. In Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, pages 248-260. PMLR.
  13. Vimla L Patel, José F Arocha, and Jiajie Zhang. 2005. Thinking and reasoning in medicine. The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning, 14:727-750.
  14. Debjit Paul, Mete Ismayilzada, Maxime Peyrard, Beat- riz Borges, Antoine Bosselut, Robert West, and Boi Faltings. 2024. REFINER: reasoning feedback on intermediate representations. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2024 -Volume 1: Long Papers, St. Julian's, Malta, March 17-22, 2024, pages 1100-1126. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.
  15. Martin Riedmiller, Roland Hafner, Thomas Lampe, Michael Neunert, Jonas Degrave, Tom Wiele, Vlad Mnih, Nicolas Heess, and Jost Tobias Springenberg. 2018. Learning by playing solving sparse reward tasks from scratch. In International conference on machine learning, pages 4344-4353. PMLR.
  16. David Silver, Julian Schrittwieser, Karen Simonyan, Ioannis Antonoglou, Aja Huang, Arthur Guez, Thomas Hubert, Lucas Baker, Matthew Lai, Adrian Bolton, et al. 2017. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. nature, 550(7676):354-359.
  17. Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S Sara Mah- davi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, et al. 2023a. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature, 620(7972):172-180.
  18. Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Amr Jamal, Khalid Alhasan, Abdulkarim A Temsah, and Khalid H Malki. 2024. Openai o1-preview vs. chatgpt in healthcare: A new frontier in medical ai reasoning. Cureus, 16(10):e70640.
  19. Alexander Trott, Stephan Zheng, Caiming Xiong, and Richard Socher. 2019. Keeping your distance: Solv- ing sparse reward tasks using self-balancing shaped rewards. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.
  20. Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le, Ed H. Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowd- hery, and Denny Zhou. 2023d. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. OpenReview.net.
  21. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou. 2022. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: Annual Conference on Neural Information Process- ing Systems 2022, NeurIPS 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, November 28 -December 9, 2022.
  22. Sean Welleck, Ximing Lu, Peter West, Faeze Brah- man, Tianxiao Shen, Daniel Khashabi, and Yejin Choi. 2023. Generating sequences by learning to self-correct. In The Eleventh International Confer- ence on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Ki- gali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. OpenReview.net.
  23. Chaoyi Wu, Weixiong Lin, Xiaoman Zhang, Ya Zhang, Weidi Xie, and Yanfeng Wang. 2024. Pmc-llama: toward building open-source language models for medicine. Journal of the American Medical Infor- matics Association, page ocae045.
  24. Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, and Noah D. Goodman. 2022. Star: Bootstrapping reasoning with reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems 35: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2022, NeurIPS 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, November 28 -December 9, 2022.
  25. Aohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang, Hanyu Lai, Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Yifan Xu, Wendi Zheng, Xiao Xia, Weng Lam Tam, Zixuan Ma, Yufei Xue, Jidong Zhai, Wenguang Chen, Zhiyuan Liu, Peng Zhang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. 2023. GLM-130b: An open bilingual pre-trained model. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
  26. Kai Zhang, Jun Yu, Eashan Adhikarla, Rong Zhou, Zhiling Yan, Yixin Liu, Zhengliang Liu, Lifang He, Brian Davison, Xiang Li, et al. 2023. Biomedgpt: a unified and generalist biomedical generative pre- trained transformer for vision, language, and multi- modal tasks. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv-2305.
  27. Aojun Zhou, Ke Wang, Zimu Lu, Weikang Shi, Sichun Luo, Zipeng Qin, Shaoqing Lu, Anya Jia, Linqi Song, Mingjie Zhan, and Hongsheng Li. 2024. Solving challenging math word problems using GPT-4 code interpreter with code-based self-verification. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Rep- resentations, ICLR 2024, Vienna, Austria, May 7-11, 2024. OpenReview.net.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Cai, Z., Ji, K., Wang, X., Liu, W., Wang, R., & Wang, B.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
  • Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data (CN)
ORCID
Ji, Ke
Venue
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025
Published
2025
Pages
14552-14573
OpenAlex
W4412888062
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 2
FWCI
14.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (12326608)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
medical reasoning, large language models, reinforcement learning, LLM fine-tuning, OpenAI o1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review