Cited by 169Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTopic Modeling

Multi-Source Domain Adaptation with Mixture of Experts

Open access
Guo, Jiang, Shah, Darsh, Barzilay, Regina·2018·Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Abstract

We propose a mixture-of-experts approach for unsupervised domain adaptation from multiple sources.The key idea is to explicitly capture the relationship between a target example and different source domains.This relationship, expressed by a point-to-set metric, determines how to combine predictors trained on various domains.The metric is learned in an unsupervised fashion using metatraining.Experimental results on sentiment analysis and part-of-speech tagging demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms multiple baselines and can robustly handle negative transfer. 1

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/d18-1498

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training on more diverse data with more product categories tends to improve generalization to unseen categories and reduce the effect of the distribution shift.

    “In addition, we find that training on more diverse data with more product categories tends to improve generalization to unseen categories and reduce the effect of the distribution shift; similar phenomena have also been reported in prior work (Mansour et al., 2009; Guo et al., 2018).”

    From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Guo et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., Shah, D., & Barzilay, R.
Affiliations
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Published
2018
Pages
4694-4703
OpenAlex
W2891691791
Cited by
168
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17
FWCI
8.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
multi-source domain adaptation, mixture of experts, unsupervised domain adaptation, negative transfer, sentiment analysis, part-of-speech tagging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review