Cited by 122Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningSentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningTopic Modeling

Neural Structural Correspondence Learning for Domain Adaptation

Open access
Ziser, Yftah, Reichart, Roi·2017·Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)

Abstract

We introduce a neural network model that marries together ideas from two prominent strands of research on domain adaptation through representation learning: structural correspondence learning (SCL, (Blitzer et al., 2006)) and autoencoder neural networks (NNs).Our model is a three-layer NN that learns to encode the non-pivot features of an input example into a lowdimensional representation, so that the existence of pivot features (features that are prominent in both domains and convey useful information for the NLP task) in the example can be decoded from that representation.The low-dimensional representation is then employed in a learning algorithm for the task.Moreover, we show how to inject pre-trained word embeddings into our model in order to improve generalization across examples with similar pivot features.We experiment with the task of cross-domain sentiment classification on 16 domain pairs and show substantial improvements over strong baselines.1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/k17-1040

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Yaroslav Ganin and Victor Lempitsky. 2015. Un- supervised domain adaptation by backpropaga- tion. In Proc. of ICML. http://dblp.uni- trier.de/rec/bib/conf/icml/GaninL15.
  2. Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Daan Wierstra. 2014. Stochastic backpropaga- tion and approximate inference in deep genera- tive models. In Proc. of ICML. http://dblp.uni- trier.de/rec/bib/conf/icml/RezendeMW14.
  3. Alexander M Rush, Roi Reichart, Michael Collins, and Amir Globerson. 2012. Improved pars- ing and pos tagging using inter-sentence consis- tency constraints. In Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL. http://aclweb.org/anthology/D12-1131.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziser, Y., & Reichart, R.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)
Published
2017
Pages
400-410
OpenAlex
W2963463240
Cited by
122
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
domain adaptation, autoencoder, representation learning, cross-domain sentiment analysis, word embeddings, low-dimensional representation, neural network model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review