The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot.This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relationextraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples.Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a context-free question-answering (QA) dataset generated by BART (Lewis et al., 2020) with human quality control, and it has been widely studied in the field of knowledge editing.”
From Knowledge Decoupling via Orthogonal Projection for Lifelong Editing of Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“To facilitate comprehensive assessment of model editing capabilities, the dataset is augmented with two types of auxiliary samples: (1) paraphrased variants of the original question, which test the model's ability to generalize the update, and (2) unrelated but structurally similar questions, which assess the specificity of the edit by ensuring unrelated knowledge remains unaffected.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ZsRE (Zero-shot Relation Extraction) dataset (Levy et al., 2017) is a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“where each record contains an editing statement x e , a paraphrase prompt x ′ e , and a locality prompt x loc .”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The ZsRE question-answering task [46] is extensively studied within the model editing literature [18, 19, 31, 15, 11]”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · cited 2×
“Hyperparameters In our experiments, we initialized word embeddings with GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014), and did not fine-tune them.”
MethodSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208 · cited 4×
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTeaching Machines to Read and ComprehendPreprint
Hermann, K. M., Kočiský, T., Grefenstette, E., Espeholt, L., Kay, W., Suleyman, M., & Blunsom, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.03340 · Cited by 2,855 · cited 1×
“To support relation extraction, our dataset deviates from recent reading comprehension formulations (Hermann et al., 2015; Rajpurkar et al., 2016), and introduces negative examples – question-sentence pairs that have no answers ( A = ∅ ).”
MethodOpen Information Extraction from the Web
Etzioni, O., Banko, M., Cafarella, M. J., Soderland, S., & Weld, D. S. (2007) · CACM · doi:10.1145/1409360.1409378 · Cited by 2,620
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M. J., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 1,698 · cited 5×
“We start from the BiDAF model (Seo et al., 2016), whose input is two sequences of words: a sentence s and a question q.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEnd-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structures
Miwa, M., & Bansal, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1105 · Cited by 1,438 · cited 1×
“Lastly, we retrain an off-the-shelf relation extraction system (Miwa and Bansal, 2016), which has shown promising results on a number of benchmarks.”
MethodRepresenting Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 827 · cited 1×
“Toutanova et al. (2015) proposed a similar approach that decomposes natural-language relations and computes their similarity in a universal schema setting; however, they did not extend their method to knowledge-base relations, nor did they attempt to recover out-of-schema relations as we do.”
BackgroundSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678 · cited 4×
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLarge-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528 · cited 2×
“The Simple QA dataset (Bordes et al., 2015) was created by annotating questions about individual Freebase facts (e.”
MethodWikidata: a new platform for collaborative data collection
Vrandečić, D. (2012) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242 · Cited by 528 · cited 3×
“WikiReading was collected by aligning each Wikidata (Vrandeˇci´c, 2012) relation R ( e, a ) with the corresponding Wikipedia article D for the entity e , under the reasonable assumption that the relation can be derived from the article’s text.”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
- Raphael Hoffmann, Congle Zhang, Xiao Ling, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Daniel S Weld. 2011. Knowledge- based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies- Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, pages 541-550.
- Sebastian Riedel, Limin Yao, Andrew McCallum, and Benjamin M. Marlin. 2013. Relation ex- traction with matrix factorization and universal schemas. In Proceedings of the 2013 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, pages 74-84. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1008.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 764
The Missing Piece in Model Editing: A Deep Dive into the Hidden Damage Brought By Model Editing
Wang, J., Gu, Z., Zhu, X., Zhang, L., Ye, H., Xiong, Z., Jiang, S., Feng, H., & Xiao, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10890406 · Cited by 14
“The primary benchmarks currently employed to assess editing methods are Zero-Shot Relation Extraction(zsRE) (Levy et al., 2017) and CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022). zsRE is a question-answering dataset designed for relation-specific queries.”
CoME: An Unlearning-based Approach to Conflict-free Model EditingPreprint
Jung, D., Seo, J., Lee, J., Park, C., & Lim, H. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.15826 · Cited by 5
“We follow the evaluation metrics setup of Counter-Fact and ZsRE as outlined in Meng et al. (2023a,b); Li et al. (2024a).”
InfluentialLearning to Rank for Multiple Retrieval-Augmented Models through Iterative Utility Maximization
Salemi, A., & Zamani, H. (2025) · ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR) · doi:10.1145/3731120.3744584 · Cited by 16
GrowOVER: How Can LLMs Adapt to Growing Real-World Knowledge?
Ko, D., Kim, J., Choi, H., & Kim, G. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.05606 · Cited by 15
“[730] As of October 2022 , Messi ranks 9th all time in goals scored from direct free kicks with 60 , the most among active players.”
Hsueh, C.-H., Huang, P. K.-M., Lin, T.-H., Liao, C.-W., Fang, H.-C., Huang, C.-W., & Chen, Y.-N. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.01436 · Cited by 15
“These tasks are assessed after 10 to 40 edits on the Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (ZsRE) dataset(Levy et al., 2017), comparing the results against pre-editing benchmarks.”
ResultHas this Fact been Edited? Detecting Knowledge Edits in Language Models
Youssef, P., Zhao, Z., Seifert, C., & Schlötterer, J. (2025) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.492 · Cited by 7
“ZS RE (Levy et al., 2017; Mitchell et al., 2022a) is a Question Answering dataset, where each instance contains a factual statement and a paraphrased prompt.”
FPC: Fine-tuning with Prompt Curriculum for Relation Extraction
Yang, S., & Song, D. (2022) · AACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.aacl-main.78 · Cited by 15
“Such methods intuitively transform RE into other targets like question answering (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019), natural language inference (Sainz et al., 2021) and translation (Paolini et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021a).”
MethodMARRO: Multi-headed Attention for Rhetorical Role Labeling in Legal Documents
Bambroo, P., Adhikary, S., Bhattacharya, P., Chakraborty, A., Ghosh, S., & Ghosh, K. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-025-09449-7 · Cited by 14
“…(ICL) is a new paradigm using the language model (LM) to perform many NLP tasks [58, 59], including entity recognition [60], relation extraction [61], document extraction [62] without Given a segment of a legal case document as enclosed within angular brackets, enlist the likely label that…”
Reasons and Solutions for the Decline in Model Performance after Editing
Huang, X.-S., Liu, J.-X., Wang, Y.-Q., & Liu, K. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.23843 · Cited by 14
“In Figure 2, we utilized the zsRE[Levy et al., 2017], ELKEN[Peng et al., 2024], 20Q[Porada et al., 2021, Gupta et al., 2023], and CKD[Huang et al., 2024] datasets as editing corpora.”
BackgroundMethodELDER: Enhancing Lifelong Model Editing with Mixture-of-LoRA
Li, J., Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., & Mao, Z. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i23.34622 · Cited by 4
“We use ZsRE and LLaMA2-7B for the analysis.”
InfluentialMLaKE: Multilingual Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models
Wei, Z., Deng, J., Pang, L., Ding, H., Shen, H.-W., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.04990 · Cited by 14
“We introduce recent datasets and knowledge editing methods in this section.”
Khodja, H. A., Béchet, F., Brabant, Q., Nasr, A., & Lecorvé, G. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/5kmnn4c4u35s · Cited by 14
“CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022) and zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) are prominent datasets to evaluate update algorithms.”
BackgroundLM-CORE: Language Models with Contextually Relevant External Knowledge
Kaur, J. N., Bhatia, S., Aggarwal, M., Bansal, R., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.57 · Cited by 11
“We find that for the ZSRE task, LMCORE achieves a significantly higher F-1 score (74.80) compared to the second-best RAG model (49.95).”
MethodInfluentialMulti-Task Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation with Relevance Sampling
Hofstätter, S., Chen, J.-C., Raman, K., & Zamani, H. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.03030 · Cited by 14
“…filling, and dialogue categories: HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), Natural Questions (NQ) (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018), Zero Shot RE (zsRE) (Levy et al., 2017)), FEVER (Thorne et al., 2018), and Wizard of Wikipedia (WoW) (Dinan et al., 2018).”
BackgroundA Survey of Knowledge Enhanced Pre-trained Language Models
Yang, J. K., Hu, X., Xiao, G., & Shen, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3631392 · Cited by 107
“Conversely, word-level linguistic knowledge is centered around individual words, capturing specific attributes such as part-of-speech tags and sentiment polarity.”
BackgroundSlot Filling for Biomedical Information Extraction
Papanikolaou, Y., Staib, M., Grace, J., & Bennett, F. (2022) · Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing (BioNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bionlp-1.7 · Cited by 11
“[21] introduced KILT, a new benchmark of knowledge intensive tasks, which contains among others two slot filling datasets, zero-shot RE which was first presented in [14] and T-REx introduced in [3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the Influence of Masking Policies in Intermediate Pre-training
Ye, Q., Li, B. Z., Wang, S., Bolte, B., Ma, H., Yih, W.-T., Ren, X., & Khabsa, M. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.573 · Cited by 10
“Zero-shot relation extraction (ZSRE, Levy et al. 2017) is a slot filling task that aims to predict the object when given the subject and the relation.”
MethodLearning Relational Representations by Analogy using Hierarchical Siamese Networks
Rossiello, G., Gliozzo, A., Farrell, R. G., Fauceglia, N. R., & Glass, M. R. (2018) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1327 · Cited by 14
“Recently, [Levy et al., 2017] propose to reduce RE slot-filling to a question answering problem.”
BackgroundZhao, Z., Yang, Y.-C., Li, Y., & Cao, Y.-Z. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.03122 · Cited by 14
“We utilize GPT-4o and GPT-J (6B) models to generate demonstrations using both few-shot and zero-shot generation (Levy et al., 2017).”
Investigating Multi-Hop Factual Shortcuts in Knowledge Editing of Large Language Models
Ju, T., Chen, Y.-J., Yuan, X., Zhang, Z.-S., Du, W., Zheng, Y., & Liu, G.-S. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11900 · Cited by 13
Universal Information Extraction with Meta-Pretrained Self-RetrievalPreprint
Yu, X., Fang, M., Liu, T., Yu, H., Hu, Z., Huang, F., Li, Y., & Wang, B. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.10444 · Cited by 1
“There exist many specific IE tasks: Named Entity Recognition (Lample et al., 2016; Lin et al., 2019), Relational Triple Extraction (Zheng et al., 2017; Levy et al., 2017), Event Extraction (Lin et al., 2018; Wadden et al., 2019; Du and Cardie, 2020; Li et al., 2022c,b,a), etc.”
BackgroundMethodPrompt-Learning for Cross-Lingual Relation Extraction
Hsu, C., Zan, C., Ding, L., Wang, L., Wang, X., Liu, W., Lin, F., & Hu, W. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10192002 · Cited by 9
“Previously, zero-shot relation extraction was approached as a slot-filling task [59] and solved through the use of reading comprehension techniques.”
MethodJudicial nested named entity recognition method with MRC framework
Hu, Z., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2023) · International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ijcce.2023.03.002 · Cited by 14
Continual Contrastive Finetuning Improves Low-Resource Relation Extraction
Zhou, W., Zhang, S., Naumann, T., Chen, M., & Poon, H. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.10823 · Cited by 13
“Some work tackles low-resource RE by indirect supervision, which solves RE by other tasks such as machine reading comprehension (Levy et al., 2017), textual entailment (Sainz et al., 2021), and abstractive summarization (Lu et al., 2022).”
BackgroundImproving Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction by Natural Language Inference
Zhou, K., Qiao, Q., Li, Y., & Li, Q. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.00346 · Cited by 13
“Zero-shot RE methods apply indirect supervision and convert RE tasks to other NLP tasks (Levy et al. 2017; Obamuyide and Vlachos 2018; Sainz et al. 2021; Lu et al. 2022).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTABi: Type-Aware Bi-Encoders for Open-Domain Entity RetrievalPreprint
Leszczynski, M., Fu, D. Y., Chen, M. F., & Ré, C. (2022) · Findings · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.08173 · Cited by 13
“We evaluate retrieval on eight datasets: FEVER (Thorne et al., 2018), T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018), Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017), Natural Questions (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), HotPotQA (Yang et al., 2018), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), ELI5 (Fan et al., 2019), and Wizard of Wikipedia (Dinan et…”
MethodSituated language learning via interactive narratives
Ammanabrolu, P., & Riedl, M. O. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100316 · Cited by 18
“The ability to automatically frame wet lab experiments in the form of text game quests and leverage the latest text-game agent advances to interactively train agents to perform them has implications for significantly improving procedural text understanding [Levy et al., 2017] and in the reproducibility of scientific e…”
BackgroundIntKB: A Verifiable Interactive Framework for Knowledge Base Completion
Kratzwald, B., Kunpeng, G., Feuerriegel, S., & Diefenbach, D. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000443741 · Cited by 13
“Following Levy et al. (2017), we treat relation extraction as a special case of reading comprehension, that is, we “ask” for the unknown tail entity.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExploring the zero-shot limit of FewRel
Cetoli, A. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.124 · Cited by 9
“More recently the work by (Levy et al., 2017) builds on Question-Answering techniques to build new datasets and models for RE: The relations are represented as questions and the answers are the connected entities.”
BackgroundMethodZhao, T., Yan, Z., Cao, Y., & Li, Z. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/546 · Cited by 78
Learning with Limited Data for Multilingual Reading Comprehension
Lee, K., Park, S., Han, H., Yeo, J., Hwang, S.-W., & Lee, J. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1283 · Cited by 13
“For negative examples, we generate synthetic noises, similarly to translation/generation errors, by adopting a naive but effective method to change words or sentences in a positive example (Levy et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2019).”
MethodREflex: Flexible Framework for Relation Extraction in Multiple Domains
Chauhan, G., McDermott, M. B. A., & Szolovits, P. (2019) · BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task (BioNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-5004 · Cited by 2
Neural Reverse Engineering of Stripped Binaries
David, Y., Alon, U., & Yahav, E. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.09122 · Cited by 13
“…(LSTM) networks [30] and gated recurrent units (GRUs) [23] were shown to be highly effective for representing sequences, and have been widely used for a variety of tasks, such as machine translation [17, 38, 56], reading comprehension [36, 53], speech recognition [18, 22, 24] and more [16, 40].”
BackgroundPlaying by the Book: An Interactive Game Approach for Action Graph Extraction from Text
Tamari, R., Shindo, H., Shahaf, D., & Matsumoto, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the Workshop on Extracting Structured Knowledge from Scientific Publications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-2609 · Cited by 13
“Procedural text understanding is a highly challenging task for today’s learning algorithms (Lucy and Gauthier, 2017; Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundNeural architectures for open-type relation argument extraction
Roth, B., Conforti, C., Poerner, N., Karn, S. K., & Schütze, H. (2018) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324918000451 · Cited by 11
“Recently, Levy et al. (2017) presented an approach that bridges question answering and query-driven answer extraction.”
BackgroundMethodAdaEdit: Advancing Continuous Knowledge Editing For Large Language Models
Li, Q., & Chu, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.208 · Cited by 5
“In this paper, we employ the most widely adopted editing datasets ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and Counterfact (Meng et al., 2022a) as editing datasets across all experiments.”
Huang, Z., He, L., Yang, Y., Li, A., Zhang, Z., Wu, S., Wang, Y., He, Y. Z., & Liu, X. (2024) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-024-00874-5 · Cited by 14
“For instance, Levy et al. [23] proposed a method to cast the relation extraction task as a QA task by parameterizing each relation type R(x,y) as a question Q(x), with y being the answer.”
MethodConsecutive Batch Model Editing with HooK Layers
Li, S., Deng, Y., Cai, D., Lu, H.-Y., Chen, L., & Lam, W. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.765 · Cited by 12
“Datasets & Evaluation Metrics We use the ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and COUNTERFACT (Meng et al., 2023) in EasyEdit 2 for evaluation.”
BackgroundMethodSainz, O., de Lacalle, O. L., Agirre, E., & Rigau, G. (2023) · Global WordNet Conference · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.03353 · Cited by 12
“Closer to our work, Textual Entailment (Dagan et al., 2006) has been used as a source of external supervision to solve several text classification tasks (Yin et al., 2019, 2020; Wang et al., 2021; Sainz and Rigau, 2021; McCann et al., 2018; White et al., 2017), Named Entity Recognition (Li et al., 2022a; Poliak et al.,…”
BackgroundWeakly-Supervised Questions for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Najafi, S., & Fyshe, A. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.09640 · Cited by 12
“…answer generator (GoldQ-Base) achieves an average F1-score of 43.6, and after fine-tuning the answer module, the baseline with gold questions achieves the highest average F1-score of 58.9, outperforming the previous BiDAF method (Levy et al., 2017), which had an average F1-score of 39.6.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZS4IE: A toolkit for Zero-Shot Information Extraction with simple Verbalizations
Sainz, O., Qiu, H., de Lacalle, O. L., Agirre, E., & Min, B. (2022) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.13602 · Cited by 12
“Out toolkit leans on recent work which has successfully recast several IE tasks as Textual Entailment (TE) tasks (White et al., 2017; Poliak et al., 2018; Levy et al., 2017; Sainz et al., 2021).”
MethodContext-NER : Contextual Phrase Generation at ScalePreprint
Gupta, H., Verma, S., Mashetty, S., & Mishra, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.08079 · Cited by 10
“Levy et al. [34] used a zero-shot approach to train MRC model on templatized questions and inferenced it on unseen relations.”
BackgroundHave my arguments been replied to? Argument Pair Extraction as Machine Reading Comprehension
Bao, J., Sun, J., Zhu, Q., & Xu, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-short.4 · Cited by 13
“Formulating NLP tasks as MRC tasks has been a rising trend in recent years, such as dependency parsing (Gan et al., 2021), relation extraction (Levy et al., 2017), named entity recognition (Li et al., 2020), sentiment analysis (Chen et al., 2021; Mao et al., 2021).”
MethodAn Exploration of Prompt-Based Zero-Shot Relation Extraction Method
Zhao, J., Hu, Y., Xu, N., Gui, T., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y., & Gao, X. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18315-7_6 · Cited by 7
“Levy et al. (2017) consider relation extraction as a machine reading comprehension.”
BackgroundHow new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute itPreprint
Sun, C., Aksitov, R., Zhmoginov, A., Miller, N. A., Vladymyrov, M., Rueckert, U., Kim, B., & Sandler, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.09522 · Cited by 11
“…benefit of applicability to free-flowing texts, and is therefore complementary to these other measures which focus on adding facts of the canonical form ( subject, relation, object , related works (Cohen et al., 2023a; Elazar et al., 2021; Hase et al., 2023; Levy et al., 2017; Meng et al., 2022a)).”
Rethinking Residual Distribution in Locate-then-Edit Model Editing
Li, X.-P., Wang, S., Li, S.-S., Song, S.-Z., Ji, B., Jun, M., & Yu, J. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/085713-2624 · Cited by 11
“Our experiments are conducted on two datasets: CounterFact [4] and zsRE [26].”
NewTerm: Benchmarking Real-Time New Terms for Large Language Models with Annual Updates
Deng, H., Jiao, W., Liu, X.-B., Zhang, M., & Tu, Z. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.20814 · Cited by 11
Zhang, H., Song, X., Jia, X., Yang, C., Chen, Z., Chen, B. Y., Jiang, B., Wang, Y., & Feng, R. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108609 · Cited by 12
DAFNet: Dynamic Auxiliary Fusion for Sequential Model Editing in Large Language Models
Zhang, T.-L., Chen, Q., Li, D., Wang, C.-Y., He, X.-F., Huang, L.-T., Xue, H., & Huang, J. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.20588 · Cited by 11
“We choose the entity-centric ZSRE (Levy et al., 2017) and the relation-centric dataset RIPE (Cohen et al., 2023) as our testing sets.”
MethodInfluentialOn the Robustness of Editing Large Language Models
Ma, X., Ju, T., Qiu, J., Zhang, Z., Zhao, H. Y., Liu, L., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.906 · Cited by 6
“(ii) zsRE (De Cao et al., 2021; Levy et al., 2017), zero-shot relation extraction, derives from a factual question-answering task.”
BackgroundThe Impacts of Unanswerable Questions on the Robustness of Machine Reading Comprehension Models
Tran, S. Q., Do, P., Le, U., & Kretchmar, M. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.00094 · Cited by 11
“MRC datasets are important sources of transfer learning for zero-shot settings in many other NLP tasks (Wu et al., 2020; Levy et al., 2017; Lyu et al., 2021; Du and Cardie, 2020; Li et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA Question-answering Based Framework for Relation Extraction ValidationPreprint
Cheng, J., Jiang, H., Yang, D., & Xiao, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.02934 · Cited by 8
“(Levy et al., 2017) models RE as a simple QA problem, i.e., giving the head entity and the relation and predicting the head entity.”
MethodLet’s Stop Incorrect Comparisons in End-to-end Relation Extraction!
Taillé, B., Guigue, V., Scoutheeten, G., & Gallinari, P. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.301 · Cited by 48
“Miwa and Bansal (2016) use a sequential BiL-STM for NER and a Tree-LSTM over the shortest dependency path between candidate arguments given by an external parser and Li et al. (2017) apply this model to biomedical data.”
MethodForeseeing the Benefits of Incidental Supervision
He, H., Zhang, M., Ning, Q., & Roth, D. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.134 · Cited by 12
“, 2018), QA-RE (Levy et al., 2017), NewsQA (Trischler et al.”
InfluentialCLER: Cross-task Learning with Expert Representation to Generalize Reading and Understanding
Takahashi, T., Taniguchi, M., Taniguchi, T., & Ohkuma, T. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5824 · Cited by 9
“…2018; Kwiatkowski et al., 2019) to train and vali-184 date the model as in-domain settings, and unveiled six out of the twelve test datasets 1 (Dua et al., 2019; Lai et al., 2017; Kembhavi et al., 2017; Levy et al., 2017; Saha et al., 2018) to validate the trained model as out-of-domain settings.”
BackgroundX-WikiRE: A Large, Multilingual Resource for Relation Extraction as Machine Comprehension
Abdou, M., Sas, C., Aralikatte, R., Augenstein, I., & Søgaard, A. (2019) · Workshop on Deep Learning Approaches for Low-Resource NLP (DeepLo) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-6130 · Cited by 9
“Slot-filling data To extract the contexts for each triple in our dataset we use the distant super-vision method described by Levy et al. (2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning for Relation Extraction: Recent Advances and New Frontiers
Zhao, X., Deng, Y., Yang, M., Wang, L.-Z., Zhang, R., Cheng, H., Lam, W., Shen, Y., & Xu, R.-F. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.02051 · Cited by 11
“For example, Levy et al. [86] first formulated the RE task as a question answering (QA) task, where the relations are defined by natural-language question templates.”
Argument mining as a multi-hop generative machine reading comprehension task
Liu, B., Schlegel, V., Batista-Navarro, R., & Ananiadou, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.724 · Cited by 5
“A recent successful trend involves treating various other natural language processing tasks as an MRC task, such as relation extraction (Levy et al., 2017), named entity recognition (Li et al., 2019), event extraction (Liu et al., 2020) and coreference resolution (Wu et al., 2020).”
New Frontiers of Information Extraction
Chen, M., Huang, L., Li, M., Zhou, B. Z., Ji, H., & Roth, D. (2022) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-tutorials.3 · Cited by 5
“This includes indirect supervision sources such as question answering and reading comprehension (Wu et al., 2020; Lyu et al., 2021; Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019b; Du and Cardie, 2020), natural language inference (Li et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialEvoEdit: Evolving Null-space Alignment for Robust and Efficient Knowledge EditingPreprint
Lyu, S., Gu, Y., Wang, X., Huang, J., Luan, S., Cui, Y., Chang, X.-W., & Lu, P. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13851 · Cited by 5
“The comparison covers both sequential editing performance and the general editing capability of large language models (LLMs).”
Layerwise Importance Analysis of Feed-Forward Networks in Transformer-based Language ModelsPreprint
Ikeda, W., Yano, K., Takahashi, R., Lee, J., Shibata, K., & Suzuki, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.17734 · Cited by 9
“To quantitatively evaluate this aspect, we use the Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) dataset (Levy et al., 2017) to measure knowledge capacity, following the methodology of Mitchell et al. (2022); Cao et al. (2021).”
On the Robustness of Generative Information Retrieval Models
Liu, Y.-A., Zhang, R.-Q., Guo, J.-F., Zhou, C.-J., de Rijke, M., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2024) · European Conference on Information Retrieval · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.18768 · Cited by 10
“In reality, an IR corpus may expand as new documents continuously enter the system.”
Zhao, R., Liu, X., Liu, X., Huang, P., Xiao, C., Xiao, T., & Zhu, J. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.962 · Cited by 9
“For the fine-tuning results, we report out-of-domain results, which include 6 datasets: BioASQ (Tsatsaronis et al., 2015), DROP (Dua et al., 2019), DuoRC (Saha et al., 2018), RACE (Lai et al., 2017), Relation Extraction (RE) (Levy et al., 2017), and TextbookQA (TQA) (Kembhavi et al., 2017).”
Supportiveness-based Knowledge Rewriting for Retrieval-augmented Language Modeling
Qiao, Z.-L., Ye, W., Jiang, Y., Mo, T., Xie, P.-J., Li, W., Huang, F., & Zhang, S.-K. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.08116 · Cited by 10
“This result validates the capability of SKR to rewrite retrieved knowledge, confirming the effectiveness of this approach.”
MEMoE: Enhancing Model Editing with Mixture of Experts AdaptorsPreprint
Wang, R., & Li, P. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.19086 · Cited by 12
“In this study, we train two meta-networks using the respective training splits from the ZsRE [26] and C OUNTER F ACT datasets for GPT-2 XL, adhering to the default hyperparameter settings.”
MethodInfluentialWang, L., Yu, K., Wumaier, A., Zhang, P., Yibulayin, T., Wu, X., Gong, J., & Maimaiti, M. (2024) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-023-01321-y · Cited by 10
“Another interestingthreadis tocast informationextraction as an MRC task [17, 34–36].”
The Web Can Be Your Oyster for Improving Large Language ModelsPreprint
Li, J., Tang, T., Zhao, W. X., Wang, J., Nie, J., & Wen, J.-R. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10998 · Cited by 24
“• Slot Filling : T-REx (ElSahar et al., 2018) and zero-shot RE (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundWikidata as a seed for Web Extraction
Guo, K.-P., Diefenbach, D., Gourru, A., & Gravier, C. (2023) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583236 · Cited by 10
“We take inspiration from similar works [10, 12] over purely textual document collections like Wikipedia.”
BackgroundMethodVector-Quantized Input-Contextualized Soft Prompts for Natural Language Understanding
Bhardwaj, R., Saha, A., Hoi, S., & Poria, S. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.11024 · Cited by 10
“Six separate datasets are kept for testing— BioASQ(Tsatsaronis et al., 2015), DROP(Dua et al., 2019), DuoRC(Saha et al., 2018), RACE(Lai et al., 2017), RelationExtraction (Levy et al., 2017), TextbookQA (Kembhavi et al., 2017).”
MethodCrowdsourcing Semantic Label Propagation in Relation Classification
Dumitrache, A., Aroyo, L., & Welty, C. A. (2018) · FEVER@EMNLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5503 · Cited by 10
“Levy et al. (2017) have shown that a small crowdsourced dataset of questions about relations can be exploited to perform zero-shot learning for relation extraction.”
BackgroundAlignRE: An Encoding and Semantic Alignment Approach for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Li, Z.-H., Zhang, F., & Cheng, J. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.174 · Cited by 10
“Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (ZSRE) was first introduced by Levy et al. (2017), and existing meth-ods can be roughly categorized into three types.”
Challenges for Information Extraction from Dialogue in Criminal Law
Hong, J., Voss, C., & Manning, C. D. (2021) · Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact (NLP4PI) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4posimpact-1.8 · Cited by 5
“…retrieval methods; they are inherent to the level of personal detail required to apply equitable justice. and Grishman, 2015; Adel et al., 2016; Levy et al., 2017; Karita et al., 2019; Luo et al., 2019), but techniques have emerged for cross-sentence or even document-level relation extraction…”
MethodEasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models
Wang, P., Zhang, N., Tian, B., Xi, Z., Yao, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, M., Mao, S., Wang, X., Cheng, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07269 · Cited by 9
“ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a question-answering (QA) dataset that generates an equivalence neighbor through back-translation.”
BackgroundNonparametric Decoding for Generative Retrieval
Lee, H., Kim, J., Chang, H., Oh, H., Yang, S., Karpukhin, V., Lu, Y., & Seo, M. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.801 · Cited by 9
“We use 9 datasets with various characteristics: FEVER (Thorne et al., 2018), AY2 (Hoffart et al., 2011), TREX (ElSahar et al., 2018), zsRE (Levy et al., 2017), NQ (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), TQA (Joshi et al., 2017), WOW (Dinan et al., 2019), NQ-320k (Tay et al., 2022), and Hot-potQA (Yang et al.,…”
MethodSelf-citationAre We Evaluating the Edit Locality of LLM Model Editing Properly?
Liu, W., Xu, H., Liu, H., Deng, Z.-Y., Li, R.-X., Huang, H., Teh, Y., & Lee, W.-S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.17343 · Cited by 9
“The results on the MCF and ZsRE datasets are in Table 4.”
InfluentialEdit Less, Achieve More: Dynamic Sparse Neuron Masking for Lifelong Knowledge Editing in LLMs
Liu, J., Sun, J.-S., Shen, S.-F., Yang, C., & Wang, S.-H. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.22139 · Cited by 9
“For the knowledge editing performance, we utilize two standard benchmarks: ZsRE [34] for question answering, and CounterFact [13] for factual corrections.”
Fine-tuning Done Right in Model EditingPreprint
Yang, W., Tang, R., Zang, H., Su, D., Cao, Q., Wang, J., Shen, H., Cheng, X., & Sun, F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.22072 · Cited by 2
“We increase the number of edits from 3K to 100K using the ZsRE dataset.”
InfluentialLoRA-Augmented Generation (LAG) for Knowledge-Intensive Language Tasks
Fleshman, W., & Durme, B. V. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05346 · Cited by 9
GuideX: Guided Synthetic Data Generation for Zero-Shot Information Extraction
Fuente, N. D. L., Sainz, O., García-Ferrero, I., & Agirre, E. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00649 · Cited by 9
“Question Answering (Levy et al., 2017) or Natural Language Inference (Obamuyide and Vlachos, 2018; Sainz et al., 2021) paradigms, leveraging supervised data from these auxiliary tasks.”
Explainable and Efficient Editing for Large Language Models
Zhang, T., Fang, J., Jiang, H., Bi, B., Wang, X., & He, X. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714835 · Cited by 3
“Following prior works [37, 38], each Counterfact metric is defined for a large language model 𝑓 𝜃 , with a knowledge prompt ( 𝑠 𝑖 𝑖 ) , an edited target output 𝑜 𝑖 , and the model’s original output 𝑜 𝑐𝑖 : • Efficacy (edit success) : The ratio of cases where 𝑜 𝑖 has a higher probability…”
LM Agents for Coordinating Multi-User Information Gathering
Jhamtani, H., Andreas, J., & Durme, B. V. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.12328 · Cited by 9
“In each database, we omit a randomly selected table, making a sub-set of the queries associated with that organization unanswerable , simulating a scenario in which required information is simply not present (Levy et al., 2017; Rajpurkar et al., 2018) in the organization.”
MPN: Leveraging Multilingual Patch Neuron for Cross-lingual Model Editing
Si, N., Zhang, H., & Zhang, W.-Q. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.03190 · Cited by 9
“Bi-zsRE (Wang et al., 2023) translates the zsRE dataset (De Cao et al., 2021; Levy et al., 2017) into Chinese with the API interfaces of gpt-3.”
MethodBeyond Output Matching: Bidirectional Alignment for Enhanced In-Context Learning
Qin, C., Xia, W., Jiao, F., Chen, C., Hu, Y., Ding, B., Chen, R., & Joty, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1573 · Cited by 9
GLIMMER: generalized late-interaction memory rerankerPreprint
de Jong, M., Zemlyanskiy, Y., FitzGerald, N., Sanghai, S. K., Cohen, W. W., & Ainslie, J. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.10231 · Cited by 5
“…this includes question answering datasets Natural Questions (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), and Hot-PotQA (Yang et al., 2018), fact verification dataset FEVER (Thorne et al., 2018), and slot-filling datasets Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017) and T-REx (ElSahar et al., 2018).”
BackgroundPlug-and-Play Document Modules for Pre-trained Models
Xiao, C.-J., Zhang, Z., Han, X., Chan, C.-M., Lin, Y., Liu, Z.-Y., Li, X.-Y., Li, Z., Cao, Z., & Sun, M. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17660 · Cited by 9
“…2019), HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), ELI5 (Fan et al., 2019), a dialogue generation dataset, Wizard of Wikipedia (WoW) (Di-nan et al., 2019), and two slot filling dataset, Zero Shot RE (zsRE) (Levy et al., 2017 require the model to exploit document knowledge fully.”
BackgroundDo Text-to-Text Multi-Task Learners Suffer from Task Conflict?
Mueller, D., Andrews, N., & Dredze, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.06645 · Cited by 9
“Similar to QA-SRL, QA-ZRE (Levy et al., 2017) formulates this problem as a question-answer dataset.”
BackgroundQA Is the New KR: Question-Answer Pairs as Knowledge Bases
Cohen, W. W., Chen, W., de Jong, M., Gupta, N., Presta, A., Verga, P., & Wieting, J. (2022) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.00630 · Cited by 9
“, for relation extraction [Levy et al., 2017], slot filling [Du et al.”
MethodSultan, M. A., Sil, A., & Florian, R. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.247 · Cited by 5
“, 2017) 674 RelEx (Levy et al., 2017) 2,948 TextbookQA (Kembhavi et al.”
Gao, D., Jia, Y., Li, L., Fu, C., Dou, Z., Jiang, H., Zhang, X., Chen, L., & Cao, Z. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.13529 · Cited by 6
“Previous NLP benchmarks are usually for evaluate general language understanding, such as slot filling (El-sahar et al., 2019; Levy et al., 2017), QA (Yang et al., 2018; Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Joshi et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2019; Kwiatkowski et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020; Ding et al., 2019; Clark…”
BackgroundNLIRE: A Natural Language Inference method for Relation Extraction
Hu, W., Liu, L., Sun, Y., Wu, Y., Liu, Z., Zhang, R., & Peng, T. (2021) · Journal of Web Semantics · doi:10.1016/j.websem.2021.100686 · Cited by 9
A Prior Information Enhanced Extraction Framework for Document-level Financial Event Extraction
Wang, H., Zhu, T., Wang, M., Zhang, G., & Chen, W. (2021) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.1162/dint_a_00103 · Cited by 9
“Beyond that, with the successful application of machine reading comprehension (MRC) in many NLP problems [7, 9], MRC is also used to NER task with the advantage of significant prior information of the entity category.”
MethodmForms : Multimodal Form Filling with Question Answering
Heck, L., Heck, S., & Sundar, A. S. (2020) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/45b8ik5r6wz9 · Cited by 9
“This approach also extends more recent work on text-based slot filling as QA (Levy et al. 2017; Du et al. 2021; Fuisz et al. 2022) by developing a much broader, multimodal computer vision-based approach.”
BackgroundControlling Risk of Web Question Answering
Su, L., Guo, J., Fan, Y., Lan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2019) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3331184.3331261 · Cited by 10
“To handle unanswerable queries in Web QA, we use the updated BIDAF model [26] that can handle null answers 6.”
MethodBOLT-K: Bootstrapping Ontology Learning via Transfer of Knowledge
Vedula, N., Maneriker, P., & Parthasarathy, S. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313511 · Cited by 5
“Levy et al [30] turned it into a reading comprehension problem by associating multiple textual questions with each relation type and learning answers for them.”
BackgroundImproving Zero-shot Relation Classification via Automatically-acquired Entailment Templates
Rahimi, M., & Surdeanu, M. (2023) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.repl4nlp-1.16 · Cited by 2
“In the literature, zero-shot RC has been reformulated as other tasks such as reading comprehension (Levy et al., 2017), textual entailment (Obamuyide and Vlachos, 2018, Sainz et al., 2021, Wang et al., 2022b), summarization (Lu et al., 2022), span-prediction (Cohen et al., 2020), question answering…”
BackgroundFine-tuning Pre-trained Language Models with Noise Stability Regularization
Hua, H., Li, X.-J., Dou, D.-J., Xu, C.-Z., & Luo, J.-B. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.05658 · Cited by 9
“RelationExtraction [82] is a multiturn QA task created from datasets, such as ACE04, ACE05, and CoNLL04, where entities and relations are converted into QA pairs using templates.”
COMPKE: Complex Question Answering under Knowledge Editing
Cheng, K.-Y., Kan, Z., He, Z., Zhang, Z., Ali, M., Xu, K., Hu, L., & Wang, D. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00829 · Cited by 8
“A widely adopted strategy for evaluating the effectiveness of KE methods is to test whether the model can reproduce newly injected knowledge, as seen in benchmarks like ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and COUNTERFACT (Meng et al., 2022a).”
Context-Robust Knowledge Editing for Language Models
Park, H., Choi, G., Kim, M., & Jo, Y. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23026 · Cited by 8
“Datasets and Benchmarks CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022b) and zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) have been used widely to evaluate KE methods.”
Du, S., Tao, Y., Shen, Y.-X., Zhang, H., Shen, Y.-X., Qiu, X., & Shi, C. (2025) · 2025 8th International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering (ICAACE) · doi:10.1109/icaace65325.2025.11019781 · Cited by 8
“In this case, an ideal output would be: “ 黄 真真 - 导 演 - 《 闺 蜜 2 》 ” Each model—Gemini, LLaMA, and ChatGPT—processes the input using its pre-trained knowledge, generating structured outputs in the form of triples.”
Scalable Model Editing via Customized Expert NetworksPreprint
Yao, Z. J., He, Y., Qi, T., & Li, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.02699 · Cited by 4
“ZsRE is a comprehensive question-answering (QA) dataset(Levy et al., 2017).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 333-342
- OpenAlex
- W2624677889
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
- Nvidia
- Tencent
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review