The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot.This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relationextraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples.Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a context-free question-answering (QA) dataset generated by BART (Lewis et al., 2020) with human quality control, and it has been widely studied in the field of knowledge editing.”
From Knowledge Decoupling via Orthogonal Projection for Lifelong Editing of Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“To facilitate comprehensive assessment of model editing capabilities, the dataset is augmented with two types of auxiliary samples: (1) paraphrased variants of the original question, which test the model's ability to generalize the update, and (2) unrelated but structurally similar questions, which assess the specificity of the edit by ensuring unrelated knowledge remains unaffected.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ZsRE (Zero-shot Relation Extraction) dataset (Levy et al., 2017) is a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“where each record contains an editing statement x e , a paraphrase prompt x ′ e , and a locality prompt x loc .”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The ZsRE question-answering task [46] is extensively studied within the model editing literature [18, 19, 31, 15, 11]”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · cited 2×
“Hyperparameters In our experiments, we initialized word embeddings with GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014), and did not fine-tune them.”
MethodSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208 · cited 4×
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTeaching Machines to Read and ComprehendPreprint
Hermann, K. M., Kočiský, T., Grefenstette, E., Espeholt, L., Kay, W., Suleyman, M., & Blunsom, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.03340 · Cited by 2,855 · cited 1×
“To support relation extraction, our dataset deviates from recent reading comprehension formulations (Hermann et al., 2015; Rajpurkar et al., 2016), and introduces negative examples – question-sentence pairs that have no answers ( A = ∅ ).”
MethodOpen Information Extraction from the Web
Etzioni, O., Banko, M., Cafarella, M. J., Soderland, S., & Weld, D. S. (2007) · CACM · doi:10.1145/1409360.1409378 · Cited by 2,620
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M. J., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 1,698 · cited 5×
“We start from the BiDAF model (Seo et al., 2016), whose input is two sequences of words: a sentence s and a question q.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEnd-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structures
Miwa, M., & Bansal, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1105 · Cited by 1,438 · cited 1×
“Lastly, we retrain an off-the-shelf relation extraction system (Miwa and Bansal, 2016), which has shown promising results on a number of benchmarks.”
MethodRepresenting Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 827 · cited 1×
“Toutanova et al. (2015) proposed a similar approach that decomposes natural-language relations and computes their similarity in a universal schema setting; however, they did not extend their method to knowledge-base relations, nor did they attempt to recover out-of-schema relations as we do.”
BackgroundSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678 · cited 4×
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLarge-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528 · cited 2×
“The Simple QA dataset (Bordes et al., 2015) was created by annotating questions about individual Freebase facts (e.”
MethodWikidata: a new platform for collaborative data collection
Vrandečić, D. (2012) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242 · Cited by 528 · cited 3×
“WikiReading was collected by aligning each Wikidata (Vrandeˇci´c, 2012) relation R ( e, a ) with the corresponding Wikipedia article D for the entity e , under the reasonable assumption that the relation can be derived from the article’s text.”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
- Raphael Hoffmann, Congle Zhang, Xiao Ling, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Daniel S Weld. 2011. Knowledge- based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies- Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, pages 541-550.
- Sebastian Riedel, Limin Yao, Andrew McCallum, and Benjamin M. Marlin. 2013. Relation ex- traction with matrix factorization and universal schemas. In Proceedings of the 2013 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, pages 74-84. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1008.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 764
Event-level Knowledge EditingPreprint
Peng, H., Wang, X., Li, C., Zeng, K., Duo, J., Cao, Y., Hou, L., & Li, J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.13093 · Cited by 14
“Most existing knowledge editing datasets assess triplet-level editing, including ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017), CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022a), Fact Verification (Mitchell et al., 2022), Calibration (Dong et al., 2022), MQuAKE (Zhong et al., 2023), RaKE (Wei et al., 2023), RIPPLEEDITS (Cohen et al., 2023 (Mitchell et al.…”
MethodPromptly Predicting Structures: The Return of Inference
Mehta, M., Pyatkin, V., & Srikumar, V. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.06877 · Cited by 8
“Methods like the re-formulation of structured prediction tasks into a question-answering (QA) format (He et al., 2015; Levy et al., 2017; Du and Cardie, 2020) intend to make such tasks more amenable for annotation.”
BackgroundfmLRE: A Low-Resource Relation Extraction Model Based on Feature Mapping Similarity Calculation
Wang, P., Shao, T., Ji, K. F., Li, G., & Ke, W. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26605 · Cited by 2
“2020), enables the model to learn information apart from feature representation when performing relation extraction, or to learn novel relations with the help of external knowledge (Levy et al. 2017), pre-trained”
BackgroundA Monte Carlo Language Model Pipeline for Zero-Shot Sociopolitical Event ExtractionPreprint
Cai, E., & O'Connor, B. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.15051 · Cited by 6
“…EE approaches, one approach that has been studied in supervised EE (Du and Cardie, 2020; Liu et al., 2020), zero-shot relation extraction (RE) (Levy et al., 2017), and zero-shot text classification (TC) (Yin et al., 2019) queries over text spans to detect events and extract arguments (Lyu et…”
BackgroundSMDM: Tackling zero-shot relation extraction with semantic max-divergence metric learning
Zhang, B., Xu, Y., Li, J., Wang, S., Ren, B., & Gao, S. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03596-z · Cited by 9
“Levy et al [20] treat zero-shot relation extraction as a question answering task, they define 10 question templates and train a reading comprehension model to match questions and relations.”
BackgroundTarget inductive methods for zero-shot regression
Fdez-Díaz, M., Quevedo, J. R., & Montañés, E. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.03.075 · Cited by 8
“The first [32] is a preliminary study, whose experiments include a single toy example based on a beta distribution with just one feature and two side information features.”
BackgroundAn MRC Framework for Semantic Role LabelingPreprint
Wang, N., Li, J., Meng, Y., Sun, X., Qiu, H., Wang, Z., Wang, G., & He, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06660 · Cited by 10
“Inspired by recent success in formulating non-MRC NLP tasks as MRC tasks (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020c), we propose an MRC framework for SRL, which can effectively utilize the semantic information provided by frame files.”
BackgroundMethodEnd-to-End Learning for Answering Structured Queries Directly over TextPreprint
Groth, P., Scerri, A., Daniel, R., & Allen, B. P. (2018) · DL4KG@ESWC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.06303 · Cited by 8
“The closest work to ours in the information extraction space is [14] where they apply machine comprehension techniques to extract relations.”
From Clozing to Comprehending: Retrofitting Pre-trained Language Model to Pre-trained Machine Reader
Xu, W., Li, X., Zhang, W.-X., Zhou, M., Bing, L., Lam, W., & Si, L. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.04755 · Cited by 8
“For EQA, we use the MRQA benchmark [15], including SQuAD [44], TriviaQA [20], NaturalQues-tion [24], NewQA [54], SearchQA [14], HotpotQA [66], BioASQ [55], DROP [13], DuoRC [47], RACE [25], RelationExtraction [27], TextbookQA [21].”
MethodLiu, H.-B., Cao, L., & Li, Y. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05096 · Cited by 7
“However, existing benchmarks are largely static or centered on single-fact updates, and seldom require handling ordered event sequences or enforcing temporal consistency (Thede et al., 2025; Levy et al., 2017; Jang et al., 2022).”
Spectral Characterization and Mitigation of Sequential Knowledge Editing Collapse
Zhang, C., Zhang, M., Ye, X., Cheng, R.-X., Zhou, Z., Zhou, Y., Ren, P., & Chen, Z.-M. (2026) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11042 · Cited by 7
“• ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a question-answering (QA) dataset.”
Investigating Model Editing for Unlearning in Large Language Models
Hossain, S., & Kagal, L. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.20794 · Cited by 7
“This also inspired the mention of ZsRE, a popular model editing evaluation dataset, as a model of the task (Levy et al., 2017).”
Lin, G.-C., Yu, X., Keung, J., Hu, X., Xia, X., & Liu, A. X. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3832130 · Cited by 7
A Survey on Unlearning in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Qiu, R., Tan, J., Pu, J., Wang, H., Gao, X.-S., & Sun, F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25117 · Cited by 13
“These include CounterFactual [107] (used by [59, 118, 167]), PKU-SafeRLHF [74] (used by [75, 76, 188]), SQuAD [125] (used by [119, 130]), and ZsRE [181] (used by [160, 167]).”
ZeroGR: A Generalizable and Scalable Framework for Zero-Shot Generative Retrieval
Sun, W., Kong, K., Ma, X., Wang, S.-Q., Yin, D.-W., de Rijke, M., Ren, Z., & Yang, Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.10419 · Cited by 7
“We show the statistics of ZeroGR-Train Dataset in the Table 5 and Figure 7.”
Is Model Editing Built on Sand? Revealing Its Illusory Success and Fragile Foundation
Liu, W., Xu, H., Liu, B.-Q., Deng, Z.-Y., Wang, H.-Z., Wang, J., Li, R.-X., Teh, Y., & Lee, W.-S. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.00625 · Cited by 7
“We employ four widely used datasets, including Multi-Counterfact (MCF) (Meng et al., 2022), ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017), MQuAKE (Zhong et al., 2023), and Wiki-Counterfact (WCF) (Zhang et al., 2024b).”
Boosting Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Generation-Augmented Retrieval: A Co-Training Approach
Tang, Y., Zhang, R., Guo, J., de Rijke, M., Fan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3729907 · Cited by 3
“…the longest matching sequence of words between a generated text and a reference text, emphasizing both precision and recall in terms of sequence [25] Zero Shot RE SF 147,909 3,724 NQ [23] Natural Questions ODQA 87,372 2,837 HoPo [66] HotpotQA ODQA 88,869 5,600 TQA [20] TriviaQA ODQA 61,844…”
ImpRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Implicit Queries
Zhang, W., Lin, X. V., Stratos, K., Yih, W.-T., & Chen, M. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02279 · Cited by 7
PT-MoE: An Efficient Finetuning Framework for Integrating Mixture-of-Experts into Prompt Tuning
Li, Z.-Q., Su, Y., & Collier, N. (2025) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.09519 · Cited by 7
“…TriviaQA [9], SearchQA [5], HotpotQA [39], NaturalQuestions [12] Out-of-domain BioASQ [28], DROP [4], DuoRC [32], RACE [13], RelationExtraction [15], Text-bookQA [10] Mathematics (Problem Solving) In-domain GSM8K [3] Out-of-domain SVAMP: Subtraction, Addition, Common-Division, Multiplication…”
SetKE: Knowledge Editing for Knowledge Elements Overlap
Wei, Y., Yu, X., Song, R., Peng, H., & Li, A. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.20972 · Cited by 7
“The dataset comprises over 700 relation types, with our study focusing on the 31 most common ones, consistent with prior research [Levy et al. , 2017; Elazar et al. , 2021; Meng et al. , 2022a; Zhong et al. , 2023; Wei et al. , 2024; Yin et al. , 2024; Ma et al. , 2024].”
Efficient and Asymptotically Unbiased Constrained Decoding for Large Language Models
Ye, H.-T., Jain, H., You, C., Suresh, A., Lin, H.-W., Zou, J. Y., & Yu, F. X. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.09135 · Cited by 7
“…2021), HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), ELI5 (Fan et al., 2019); slot filling with T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018), Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017); entity disambiguation on AIDA CoNLL-YAGO, WNED-WIKI and WNED-CEWB; dialog with Wizard of Wikipedia (Dinan et al., 2018).”
Composable Interventions for Language ModelsPreprint
Kolbeinsson, A., O'Brien, K., Huang, T., Gao, S., Liu, S., Schwarz, J. R., Vaidya, A. J., Mahmood, F., Žitnik, M., Chen, T., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.06483 · Cited by 6
“We use the zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) dataset, which is a popular question-answering benchmark for knowledge editing.”
KBPT: knowledge-based prompt tuning for zero-shot relation triplet extraction
Guo, Q., Guo, Y., & Zhao, J. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.2014 · Cited by 8
Knowledge Editing on Black-box Large Language Models
Song, X., Wang, Z., He, K., Dong, G., Mou, Y.-T., Zhao, J.-X., & Xu, W.-R. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.08631 · Cited by 7
“• zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is one of the most popular question answering (QA) datasets which use question rephrasing as the equivalence neighborhood.”
BackgroundMethodA novel MRC framework for evidence extracts in judgment documents
Zhou, Y., Liu, L., Chen, Y., Huang, R., Qin, Y., & Lin, C. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-023-09344-z · Cited by 7
“Levy et al. (2017) converted the tasks of relation extraction into question answering (QA) tasks.”
STAD: Self-Training with Ambiguous Data for Low-Resource Relation Extraction
Yu, J., Wang, X., Zhao, J., Yang, C.-P., & Chen, W.-L. (2022) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.01431 · Cited by 7
“Low-shot RE, including few-shot RE (Han et al., 2018) and zero-shot RE (Levy et al., 2017), trains a model to identify unseen relation labels in a test set with a few support examples or even none of the examples.”
BackgroundGenerating Questions from Wikidata Triples
Han, K., Ferreira, T. C., & Gardent, C. (2022) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.63317/2sfirk253cvp · Cited by 7
“ZeroshotRE is a KBQA corpus consisting of several questions generated based on 1,192 crowd-sourced question templates (e.g., “Where did x graduate from?””
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCoMe-KE: A New Transformers Based Approach for Knowledge Extraction in Conflict and Mediation Domain
Parolin, E. S., Hu, Y., Khan, L. R., Osorio, J., Brandt, P. T., & D'Orazio, V. J. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata52589.2021.9672080 · Cited by 6
Cao, R., & Luo, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i14.17494 · Cited by 8
“[Levy et al. 2017] aim to extract relation in natural language sentences that are only specified at test-time.”
BackgroundZhu, G., Fan, J., Huang, X., Zhang, N., Wu, B., & Wei, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2023.3337135 · Cited by 11
“Inspired by current academic research on machine reading comprehension (MRC) [30], [31], some researchers have also started to turn the entity extraction problem into a MRC task about entity types.”
Data-Efficient Information Extraction from Documents with Pre-trained Language Models
Sage, C., Douzon, T., Aussem, A., Églin, V., Elghazel, H., Duffner, S., García, C., & Espinas, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86159-9_33 · Cited by 8
“We have particularly in mind the question answering format [11] which has already shown success for zero-shot relation extraction [19].”
BackgroundExploring The Landscape of Distributional Robustness for Question Answering Models
Awadalla, A., Wortsman, M., Ilharco, G., Min, S., Magnusson, I., Hajishirzi, H., & Schmidt, L. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.12517 · Cited by 6
“…questions from textbooks TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017) 7,785 Trivia questions with contexts collected using a Bing search RelationExtraction (Levy et al., 2017) 2,948 Generated samples using a knowledge base BioASQ (Tsatsaronis et al., 2015) 1,504 Medical articles and Liang, 2021), and LoRA…”
MethodUnKE: Unstructured Knowledge Editing in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Deng, J., Wei, Z., Pang, L., Ding, H., Shen, H.-W., & Cheng, X.-Q. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15349 · Cited by 6
“The two prominent datasets are ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and COUNTERFACT (Meng et al., 2022).”
CrispEdit: Low-Curvature Projections for Scalable Non-Destructive LLM Editing
Ikram, Z., Firouzkouhi, A., Tu, S., Soltanolkotabi, M., & Rashidinejad, P. (2026) · Proceedings of machine learning research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.15823 · Cited by 6
“7) for ZsRE, while CrispEdit - Seq uses ( n, γ ) = 4, CrispEdit uses ( n, γ ) = (1 , 000 , 0 .”
InfluentialZhang, W., Chen, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107807 · Cited by 7
Large Language Model Sourcing: A SurveyPreprint
Pang, L., Gu, J., Dai, S., Wei, Z., Duan, Z., Wu, K., Yin, Z., Xu, J., Shen, H., & Cheng, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.10161 · Cited by 9
“Initial efforts concentrating on foundational knowledge include LAMA [143], which utilizes cloze-style probes for factual retrieval, and datasets like ZsRE [103] and COUNTERFACT [125], which introduce counterfactuals to facilitate causal tracing to specific layers or heads.”
NeuralDB: Scaling Knowledge Editing in LLMs to 100,000 Facts with Neural KV DatabasePreprint
Fei, W., Shi, H., Xu, J. M., Peng, J., Li, J., Zhang, J., Bai, B. B., Han, W., Chen, Z., & Niu, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.18028
“To evaluate KE methods, we utilize two widely recognized benchmarks: the Counterfact dataset [9] and the ZsRE dataset [19].”
Beyond Memorization: A Rigorous Evaluation Framework for Medical Knowledge Editing
Chen, S.-G., Luo, L.-H., Qiu, Z., Cao, Y., Yang, C., & Pan, S.-R. (2025) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.03490 · Cited by 6
“Current evaluations of KE methods primarily focused on general-domain benchmarks, such as WikiData (Meng et al., 2022) and counterfactual datasets (Levy et al., 2017), which aimed to up-date LLMs with new knowledge that contradicted common facts.”
DocMEdit: Towards Document-Level Model Editing
Zeng, L., Liu, Z., Feng, C., Huang, H.-Y., & Guo, Y. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.19572 · Cited by 6
“Tasks in existing datasets include QA, sentence completion, choose, and cloze tests (Zeng et al., 2024; Zhong et al., 2023; Levy et al., 2017a; Meng et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2024c; Wang et al., 2024c).”
Memorization and Knowledge Injection in Gated LLMsPreprint
Pan, X., Hahami, E., Zhang, Z., & Sompolinsky, H. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.21239 · Cited by 10
“Most widely used knowledge editing datasets (Levy et al., 2017; Meng et al., 2022a; Zhang et al., 2024; Thede et al., 2025) represent knowledge as simple subject-relation-object triples.”
Efficient Tuning of Large Language Models for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation
Zhang, B., Ma, H., Li, D., Ding, J., Wang, J., Xu, B., & Lin, H. (2025) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl.a.17 · Cited by 5
“We evaluate KEDiT on the following tasks included in KILT: FEVER (Thorne et al., 2018), AIDA CoNLL-YAGO (AY2; Hoffart et al., 2011), Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017), Natural Questions (NQ; Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), and ELI5 (Fan et al.,…”
Erasing Without Remembering: Implicit Knowledge Forgetting in Large Language Models
Wang, H., Jing, Y., Sun, H., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Liao, J., & Tao, D. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.88 · Cited by 12
“The benchmark spans three data domains: two widely-used machine unlearning datasets, TOFU [18] and the Harry Potter books [19, 20], as well as a popular model editing dataset, ZsRE [21].”
GeoEdit: Geometric Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models
Feng, Y.-J., Zhan, L.-M., Lu, Z.-X., Xu, Y., Chu, X., Wang, Y.-S., Cao, J., Yu, P. S., & Wu, X.-M. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.19953 · Cited by 6
“We use two well-known datasets: ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and C OUNTER F ACT (Meng et al., 2022).”
InfluentialMEMLA: Enhancing Multilingual Knowledge Editing with Neuron-Masked Low-Rank Adaptation
Xie, J., Cao, P., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, K., & Zhao, J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11566 · Cited by 6
“Additionally, we present a comparison between MKEB and other datasets, including CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022), zsRE (Levy et al., 2017), MQuAKE (Zhong et al., 2023), and MLaKE (Wei et al., 2024), in Table 2.”
MethodHCL: A Hierarchical Contrastive Learning Framework for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Yan, T., Zhao, S., Hu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, X., Luo, Z., & Wang, M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3379527 · Cited by 4
“Levy et al. [4] transfer ZSRE as a reading comprehensive task, which relies on human effort to design question and answer template for relation classes.”
See the Unseen: Better Context-Consistent Knowledge-Editing by NoisesPreprint
Huang, Y.-C., Lei, W.-Q., Zhang, Z., Lv, J.-C., & Yan, S. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.07544 · Cited by 6
“We first conduct experiments on zsRE Levy et al. (2017), which is a question-answering task containing real-world facts and test the ability of adding correct information to LLMs. zsRE is a prediction task and only prediction-based metrics are evaluated.”
MethodGlobal information-aware argument mining based on a top-down multi-turn QA model
Liu, B., Schlegel, V., Thompson, P., Batista-Navarro, R., & Ananiadou, S. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103445 · Cited by 6
Modeling Zero-Shot Relation Classification as a Multiple-Choice Problem
Lan, Y., Li, D., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H. J., & Zhao, G. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn54540.2023.10191459 · Cited by 2
“[9] reframe ZeroRC as a question-answering problem.”
BackgroundDomain Incremental Lifelong Learning in an Open World
Dai, Y., Lang, H., Zheng, Y., Bowen, Y., Huang, F., & Li, Y.-B. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06555 · Cited by 6
Multilingual Entity and Relation Extraction from Unified to Language-specific Training
Wang, Z., Yang, J., Li, T., Chai, L., Liu, J., Mo, Y., Bai, J., & Li, Z. (2023) · International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Communication Technology (CECCT) · doi:10.1145/3637494.3637512 · Cited by 6
“Entity and relation extraction (ERE) contains two sub-tasks called named entity recognition (NER) [8, 10, 21, 23] and relation classification (RC) [13, 14], which is the fundamental step of automatic knowledge graphs (KGs) [15] construction, knowledge discovery and intelligent question answering…”
BackgroundFew-shot Adaptation Works with UnpredicTable Data
Chan, J. S., Pieler, M., Jao, J. F., Scheurer, J., & Perez, E. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.01009 · Cited by 6
“, 2018), kilt_zsre (Levy et al., 2017), lama-conceptnet (Petroni et al.”
SQL Generation via Machine Reading Comprehension
Yan, Z., Ma, J., Zhang, Y., & Shen, J. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.31 · Cited by 5
“Recently, there is a trend to cast non-QA NLP tasks, such as information extraction (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020), text classification and more (McCann et al., 2018; Keskar et al., 2019) into MRC, which can achieve comparable or improved results on the original task, thanks…”
BackgroundSogou Machine Reading Comprehension ToolkitPreprint
Wu, J., Yang, Y., Deng, C., Tang, H., Wang, B., Sun, H., Yao, T., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.11848 · Cited by 5
“Following (Levy et al., 2017) and (Yatskar, 2018), we implement several effective models.”
MethodBiomedical Relation Extraction with Entity Type Markers and Relation-specific Question Answering
Yamada, K., Miwa, M., & Sasaki, Y. (2023) · Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing (BioNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.bionlp-1.35 · Cited by 8
“In recent years, several methods that tackle the relation extraction (RE) task with question answering (QA) have shown impressive results (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Cohen et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMetis: Memory Foundation Model
Zhang, Z.-Y., Guo, Z.-L., Sun, Y., Zhang, X.-C., Hao, X.-X., Lin, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X.-Y., Shen, T., Tang, B., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.26760 · Cited by 5
“At step 𝑡 , the model reads the input instruction 𝑋 𝑡 and generates the assistant response 𝑌 𝑡 = ( 𝑦 𝑡, 1 , 𝑦 𝑡, | 𝑌 𝑡 | ) .”
Do Text Edits Generalize to Visual Generation? Benchmarking Cross-Modal Knowledge Editing in UMMs
Gao, X., Yang, C., Shi, C.-F., & Berg-Kirkpatrick, T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.00477 · Cited by 5
“ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) evaluates text-based question-answering edits and robustness to rephrased queries.”
Navigating by Old Maps: The Pitfalls of Static Mechanistic Localization in LLM Post-Training
Chen, H., Zhu, J., Chen, H., Liu, H., Yang, X.-Y., & Wang, W.-Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.06076 · Cited by 5
“…15 datasets widely adopted in mechanistic interpretability and post-training research: OpenBookQA [40], Gender [41], RTE [42], IOI [43], Docstring [44], SST2 [45], Winogrande [46], Reverse [47], Greater Than [48], FEVER [49], zsRE [50], Induction [15], Bool [51], Arithmetic [52], and SA [53].”
MoEEdit: Efficient and Routing-Stable Knowledge Editing for Mixture-of-Experts LLMs
Gu, Y.-P., Wei, R.-Z., Zhu, A., & Li, P. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.10965 · Cited by 5
“Following prior work, we use COUNTERFACT (single-hop counterfactual edits introduced with MEMIT) (Meng et al., 2023) and ZsRE (zero-shot relation extraction) (Levy et al., 2017).”
Model Merging for Knowledge Editing
Fu, Z.-C., Wu, X., Li, G.-J., Zhang, Y.-Y., Zheng, Y., Ming, T., Wang, Y., Wang, W.-Y., & Zhao, X.-Y. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.12384 · Cited by 5
“We select KnowEdit (Zhang et al., 2024c) for knowledge editing tasks, mainly on ZsRE dataset (Levy et al., 2017).”
Zero-Shot Open-Schema Entity Structure Discovery
Xu, X.-Q., Xiao, J.-F., Barry, J., Elkaref, M., Zou, J., Jiang, P.-C., Zhang, Y., Giammona, M. J., de Mel, G., & Han, J.-W. (2025) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.04458 · Cited by 5
“Zero-shot relation extraction (ZSRE) aims to identify semantic relations between entities without relying on labeled training instances (Levy et al., 2017).”
LyapLock: Bounded Knowledge Preservation in Sequential Large Language Model Editing
Wang, P., Zhou, B., Tang, X., Han, J.-Z., & Hu, S. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15702 · Cited by 5
“Additionally, on the ZsRE dataset, although the overall trend was similar to that on the CounterFact dataset, there were some fluctuations in the related metrics, which may be attributed to the characteristics of the dataset itself or the model’s adaptability to different datasets.”
InfluentialMindBridge: Scalable and Cross-Model Knowledge Editing via Memory-Augmented Modality
Li, S., Zhang, K., Liu, Q., & Chen, E.-H. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.02701 · Cited by 5
“For the benchmark, we evaluated MindBridge on two commonly used knowledge editing datasets: the ZsRE dataset (Levy et al., 2017) and the Counterfact dataset (Meng et al., 2022a).”
Constraining Sequential Model Editing with Editing Anchor Compression
Xu, H.-Y., Ma, J.-J., Ling, Z.-H., Zhang, N., & Gu, J.-C. (2025) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.00035 · Cited by 5
“In our experiment, two popular model editing datasets Z S RE (Levy et al., 2017) and C OUNTER -”
InfluentialLi, D., Zhang, L., Jie, H. J., Xiong, N. N., Zhang, L., & Wan, J. (2024) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-024-01642-6 · Cited by 5
“Levy et al. [14] first introduced the zero-shot relation extraction task and proposed a paradigm based on machine reading comprehension (MRC).”
InfluentialWang, R.-Z., & Li, P.-J. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.18292 · Cited by 5
“For dataset, we use two prominent knowledge datasets: ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and C OUNTER -”
MethodInfluentialA Chinese named entity recognition model: integrating label knowledge and lexicon information
Yuan, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhou, X., & Gao, M. (2024) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-024-02207-2 · Cited by 5
“And QA forms [21] can include different types of question-and-answer tasks.”
On the Use of Silver Standard Data for Zero-shot Classification Tasks in Information Extraction
Wang, J.-W., Wang, T., & Zeng, Z.-Q. (2024) · International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.18061 · Cited by 5
“Recent works (Levy et al., 2017; Obamuyide and Vlachos, 2018; Zhao et al., 2023) formulated the zero-shot RE to other NLP tasks such as reading comprehension (Levy et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2023) and textual entailment (Oba-muyide and Vlachos, 2018).”
BackgroundOpen-world Semi-supervised Generalized Relation Discovery Aligned in a Real-world Setting
Hogan, W., Li, J., & Shang, J.-B. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13533 · Cited by 5
“Zero-shot Relation Extraction: Zero-shot relation extraction methods typically assume that test data only contains novel classes and that descriptions for those novel classes are readily available (Levy et al., 2017; Obamuyide and Vlachos, 2018; Lockard et al., 2020; Chen and Li, 2021).”
MethodInformation Extraction Network Based on Multi-Granularity Attention and Multi-Scale Self-Learning
Sun, W., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Kong, L., & Jian, Z. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23094250 · Cited by 7
“[29] first converted the relation extraction task into the form of reading comprehension, which could adapt to zero-shot scenario problems.”
BackgroundMulti-Turn and Multi-Granularity Reader for Document-Level Event Extraction
Yang, H., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Zhao, J., Zhao, Z., & Sun, W. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3542925 · Cited by 4
“Levy et al. [17] first reduce the relation extraction to answering crowd-source questions and effectively generalize to zero-shot scenarios.”
BackgroundLan, Y., Li, D., Zhang, Y.-Q., Zhao, H., & Zhao, G. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.14477 · Cited by 5
Interactive Gated Decoder for Machine Reading Comprehension
Cui, Y., Che, W., Yang, Z., Liu, T., Qin, B., Wang, S., & Hu, G.-P. (2022) · ACM Trans. Asian Low Resour. Lang. Inf. Process. · doi:10.1145/3501399 · Cited by 5
“They also provide several baselines, such as BiDAF-No-Answer (BNA), which is originated from the BiDAF model [26] with an unanswerable classification module [19].”
MethodHow Optimal is Greedy Decoding for Extractive Question Answering?Preprint
Castel, O., Ram, O., Efrat, A., & Levy, O. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.05857 · Cited by 5
Self-citationGenerating Response-Specific Elaborated Feedback Using Long-Form Neural Question Answering
Olney, A. M. (2021) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3430895.3460131 · Cited by 1
“This work reflects an increasing convergence between language models, knowledge bases, and question answering, such that problems in one have been shown as solvable in another [22, 29, 37].”
BackgroundQA4IE: A Question Answering Based System for Document-Level General Information Extraction
Qiu, L., Ru, D., Long, Q.-Y., Zhang, W.-N., & Yu, Y. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970119 · Cited by 5
“With the experimental results shown in the Table 15 and Table 16, we can see that our model outperforms the baseline provided by [11] in both unseen entities setting and unseen relations setting with the help of our Answer Triggering model.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZhai, S.-L., Meng, Y., Zhang, Y.-X., & Qi, G.-L. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1367 · Cited by 5
“Datasets & LLMs : Following previous works (Mitchell et al., 2022a; Meng et al., 2022, 2023; Li et al., 2024b), we also use the EDIT sets of Z S RE (Levy et al., 2017) and C OUNTER F ACT (Meng et al., 2022) to evaluate our method.”
LLM Agents for Coordinating Multi-User Information Gathering
Jhamtani, H., Andreas, J., & Durme, B. V. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.916 · Cited by 5
“In each database, we omit a randomly selected table, making a sub-set of the queries associated with that organization unanswerable , simulating a scenario in which required information is simply not present (Levy et al., 2017; Rajpurkar et al., 2018) in the organization.”
Correcting Language Model Outputs by Editing Salient Layers
Mishra, K., Soliman, T., Ramakrishna, A., Galstyan, A., & Kumar, A. (2024) · Findings · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-eacl.86 · Cited by 5
“We consider five text classification datasets: i) FEVER-F ACT C HECKING (Thorne et al., E (Levy et al., 2017) and W IKI T EXT (Merity, 2016) datasets.”
MethodInterpretability-based Tailored Knowledge Editing in Transformers
Hong, Y., & Lipani, A. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.225 · Cited by 1
“Currently, in most knowledge editing papers, researchers often evaluate the performance of knowledge editing techniques using idealized datasets like COUNTERFACT (Meng et al., 2022a) and ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodEditable Fairness: Fine-Grained Bias Mitigation in Language Models
Chen, R.-Z., Li, Y., Yang, J.-F., Zhou, J. T., & Liu, Z.-Z. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.11843 · Cited by 5
“We conduct experiments on the knowledge-editing task of Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) (Levy et al., 2017).”
Gabud, R., Lapitan, P. G., Mariano, V. Y., Mendoza, E., Pampolina, N. M., Clariño, M. A. A. D., & Batista-Navarro, R. (2023) · PANDL · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.pandl-1.10 · Cited by 4
“For instance, Levy et al. (2017) reduced RE to the problem of answering simple reading comprehension questions.”
BackgroundLiu, J., Chen, Y., & Xu, J. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3210442 · Cited by 5
“To name a few, authors in [9], [33] cast relation”
BackgroundMethodHow Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictions
Fabio Petroni, P. L. (2020) · Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC) · doi:10.24432/c5201w · Cited by 4
“In order to apply DrQA to the LAMA probe, we take inspiration from [Levy et al., 2017] and map each cloze-style template to a natural question template ( e.g. , “ X was born in [Mask] ” to “Where was X born?”).”
MethodWISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models
Wang, P., Li, Z., Zhang, N., Xu, Z., Yao, Y., Jiang, Y., Xie, P., Huang, F., & Chen, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14768 · Cited by 19
“Following [10], we evaluate WISE on the closed-book question-answering (QA) dataset ZsRE [46], and also evaluate its ability to correct Hallucination in SelfCheckGPT [48].”
MEMORYLLM: Towards Self-Updatable Large Language Models
Wang, Y., Gao, Y., Chen, X., Jiang, H., Li, S., Yang, J., Yin, Q., Li, Z., Li, X., Yin, B., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.04624 · Cited by 4
“We train our model on the processed version of the C4 dataset (Raffel et al., 2020) from Red-Pajama (Computer, 2023).”
MethodCatastrophic Forgetting in Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks
Rahman, M. M., Wang, G.-C., Zhou, K., Chen, M., & Yang, F. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.12828 · Cited by 4
Measuring the Effect of Disfluency in Multilingual Knowledge Probing Benchmarks
Semenov, K., & Sennrich, R. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.539 · Cited by 4
“The first datasets for this task, such as zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) or ParaRel (Elazar et al., 2021), were initially created to test encoder-based models such as BERT (Devlin et al., 2018), but then started being used for decoder models evaluation (for example Yao et al., 2023; Meng et al., 2022).”
KnowledgeSmith: Uncovering Knowledge Updating in LLMs with Model Editing and UnlearningPreprint
Luo, Y., Zhou, Z., Chen, H., Qiu, K., Savvides, M., Li, S., & Wang, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02392 · Cited by 2
“Existing benchmarks (Meng et al., 2022a; Levy et al., 2017) for knowledge intervention evaluation suffer from two major limitations.”
Cao, D., Cai, Y., Huang, Y., He, X., Guo, R., Liu, G., & Sun, G. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v40i36.40263
Assessing and Post-Processing Black Box Large Language Models for Knowledge Editing
Song, X., Wang, Z., He, K., Dong, G., Mou, Y., Zhao, J., & Xu, W. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714732 · Cited by 1
Edit Once, Update Everywhere: A Simple Framework for Cross-Lingual Knowledge Synchronization in LLMs
Wu, Y., Ding, L., Shen, L., & Tao, D.-C. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14645 · Cited by 4
“We evaluate X-KDE and Baselines using two widely used benchmarks: Bi-ZsRE dataset (Wang et al., 2023a) and MzSRE dataset (Wang et al., 2023d).”
InfluentialLi, D., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., Jie, H. J., Xiong, N. N., Zhang, L., & Wan, J. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126077 · Cited by 4
FAME: Towards Factual Multi-Task Model Editing
Zeng, L., Shan, Y., Liu, Z., Yao, J., & Guo, Y. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10859 · Cited by 4
“Moreover, these datasets are all composed of data in a single format with a single task like QA (Levy et al., 2017) or sentence completion (Meng et al., 2022), which leads to a disparity between experiments and practical applications.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBetter Call SAUL: Fluent and Consistent Language Model Editing with Generation Regularization
Wang, M., Lange, L., Adel, H., Strötgen, J., & Schutze, H. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02433 · Cited by 4
“ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a question-answering dataset consisting of 10,000 real-world facts, used to test model editing methods for adding correct information.”
MethodInfluentialLiu, X., Liu, Z., Gu, N.-B., Lin, Z., Ma, W., Xiang, J., & Wang, W.-P. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.15091 · Cited by 4
“For evaluation, we conduct experiments on 10 , 000 ( 2 , 000 ) samples of COUNTERFACT (Meng et al. 2022a) dataset for GPT2-XL (GPT-J), 1 , 000 samples of COUNTERFACT for Llama-2 and 10 , 000 samples of Zero-shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) (Levy et al. 2017; Meng et al. 2022a) for GPT2-XL.”
Resolving Lexical Bias in Model Editing
Rizwan, H., Rosati, D., Wu, G., & Sajjad, H. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.10411 · Cited by 4
“Dataset The zsRE dataset (Levy et al., 2017) and the Counterfact dataset (Meng et al., 2022) are the most commonly used model editing datasets. zsRE consists of an edit prompt along with several paraphrased versions of that prompt.”
Breaking Boundaries: Investigating the Effects of Model Editing on Cross-linguistic Performance
Banerjee, S., Halder, A., Mandal, R., Layek, S., Soboroff, I., Hazra, R., & Mukherjee, A. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11139 · Cited by 4
“), generalization (Gen), locality (Loc), and portability (Port) scores for multiple language models evaluated using the ZsRE dataset and the MEMIT editing method.”
InfluentialWang, X., Liu, J., Wang, J., Duan, J., Guan, G., Zhang, Q., & Zhou, J. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3666042 · Cited by 4
“Levy et al. [25] simplified the relation extraction task to a single QA task by associating one or more natural language questions with each relation slot.”
Gabud, R., Lapitan, P. G., Mariano, V. Y., Mendoza, E., Pampolina, N. M., Clariño, M. A. A. D., & Batista-Navarro, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1371411 · Cited by 3
HRCL: Hierarchical Relation Contrastive Learning for Low-Resource Relation Extraction
Guo, Q., Guo, Y., & Zhao, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3386611 · Cited by 4
“Low-shot RE, including few-shot RE [3] and zero-shot RE [54], trains a model to recognize unseen relation labels in a test set with a few support instances or even none of the instances.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 333-342
- OpenAlex
- W2624677889
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
- Nvidia
- Tencent
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review