The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot.This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relationextraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples.Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) is a context-free question-answering (QA) dataset generated by BART (Lewis et al., 2020) with human quality control, and it has been widely studied in the field of knowledge editing.”
From Knowledge Decoupling via Orthogonal Projection for Lifelong Editing of Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“To facilitate comprehensive assessment of model editing capabilities, the dataset is augmented with two types of auxiliary samples: (1) paraphrased variants of the original question, which test the model's ability to generalize the update, and (2) unrelated but structurally similar questions, which assess the specificity of the edit by ensuring unrelated knowledge remains unaffected.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ZsRE (Zero-shot Relation Extraction) dataset (Levy et al., 2017) is a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating factual consistency and knowledge editing in language models.”
From UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Levy et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“where each record contains an editing statement x e , a paraphrase prompt x ′ e , and a locality prompt x loc .”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The ZsRE question-answering task [46] is extensively studied within the model editing literature [18, 19, 31, 15, 11]”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · cited 2×
“Hyperparameters In our experiments, we initialized word embeddings with GloVe (Pennington et al., 2014), and did not fine-tune them.”
MethodSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1264 · Cited by 6,208 · cited 4×
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTeaching Machines to Read and ComprehendPreprint
Hermann, K. M., Kočiský, T., Grefenstette, E., Espeholt, L., Kay, W., Suleyman, M., & Blunsom, P. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.03340 · Cited by 2,855 · cited 1×
“To support relation extraction, our dataset deviates from recent reading comprehension formulations (Hermann et al., 2015; Rajpurkar et al., 2016), and introduces negative examples – question-sentence pairs that have no answers ( A = ∅ ).”
MethodOpen Information Extraction from the Web
Etzioni, O., Banko, M., Cafarella, M. J., Soderland, S., & Weld, D. S. (2007) · CACM · doi:10.1145/1409360.1409378 · Cited by 2,620
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M. J., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 1,698 · cited 5×
“We start from the BiDAF model (Seo et al., 2016), whose input is two sequences of words: a sentence s and a question q.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEnd-to-End Relation Extraction using LSTMs on Sequences and Tree Structures
Miwa, M., & Bansal, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1105 · Cited by 1,438 · cited 1×
“Lastly, we retrain an off-the-shelf relation extraction system (Miwa and Bansal, 2016), which has shown promising results on a number of benchmarks.”
MethodRepresenting Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 827 · cited 1×
“Toutanova et al. (2015) proposed a similar approach that decomposes natural-language relations and computes their similarity in a universal schema setting; however, they did not extend their method to knowledge-base relations, nor did they attempt to recover out-of-schema relations as we do.”
BackgroundSQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678 · cited 4×
“The task of obtaining answer spans to natural-language questions has been recently studied on the SQuAD dataset (Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Xiong et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLarge-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528 · cited 2×
“The Simple QA dataset (Bordes et al., 2015) was created by annotating questions about individual Freebase facts (e.”
MethodWikidata: a new platform for collaborative data collection
Vrandečić, D. (2012) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242 · Cited by 528 · cited 3×
“WikiReading was collected by aligning each Wikidata (Vrandeˇci´c, 2012) relation R ( e, a ) with the corresponding Wikipedia article D for the entity e , under the reasonable assumption that the relation can be derived from the article’s text.”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
- Raphael Hoffmann, Congle Zhang, Xiao Ling, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Daniel S Weld. 2011. Knowledge- based weak supervision for information extraction of overlapping relations. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies- Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, pages 541-550.
- Sebastian Riedel, Limin Yao, Andrew McCallum, and Benjamin M. Marlin. 2013. Relation ex- traction with matrix factorization and universal schemas. In Proceedings of the 2013 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia, pages 74-84. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1008.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 764
A Unified Framework for Model Editing
Gupta, A., Sajnani, D., & Anumanchipalli, G. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.14236 · Cited by 86
“We begin by experimenting with EMMET for model editing with varied batch sizes on GPT2-XL, GPT-J and Llama-2-7b on the CounterFact and zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) datasets.”
MethodBuilding Dynamic Knowledge Graphs from Text using Machine Reading Comprehension
Das, R., Munkhdalai, T., Yuan, X., Trischler, A., & Mccallum, A. (2018) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.05682 · Cited by 82
“These models have been shown to perform well in a zero-shot setting, i.e., for a previously unseen relation type (Levy et al., 2017), and for extracting entities that belong to non-standard types (Roth et al., 2018).”
MethodAutoregressive Search Engines: Generating Substrings as Document Identifiers
Bevilacqua, M., Ottaviano, G., Lewis, P., Yih, W.-T., Riedel, S., & Petroni, F. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.10628 · Cited by 80
“Surfacing knowledge from large corpora is a crucial step when dealing with knowledge intensive language tasks (Levy et al., 2017; Dinan et al., 2019; Elsahar et al., 2018; Petroni et al., 2021), such as open-domain question answering (Voorhees et al., 1999; Joshi et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2018;…”
BackgroundKnowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Survey
Wang, S., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., Zheng, Z., Chen, C., & Li, J. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3698590 · Cited by 79
“Specifically, these datasets can be divided into two groups: textual-output datasets (i.e., generation tasks) and categorical-output datasets (i.e., classification tasks).”
Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Xu, J., & Li, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i16.17720 · Cited by 70
“Levy et al. (2017) leverage the MRC framework to settle the zero-shot relation extraction.”
DyKgChat: Benchmarking Dialogue Generation Grounding on Dynamic Knowledge Graphs
Tuan, Y.-L., Chen, Y.-N. (., & Lee, H.-Y. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1194 · Cited by 78
“Most probabilities lie on two and three hops rather than zero and one hop, so key-value extraction based text generative models (Eric et al., 2017; Levy et al., 2017; Qian et al., 2018) are not suitable for this task.”
BackgroundMass-Editing Memory in a Transformer
Meng, K., Sharma, A. S., Andonian, A., Belinkov, Y., & Bau, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.07229 · Cited by 76
“5) We first test MEMIT on zsRE (Levy et al., 2017), a question-answering task from which we extract 10,000 real-world facts; zsRE tests MEMIT’s ability to add correct information.”
MethodAn Exploration of Data Augmentation and Sampling Techniques for Domain-Agnostic Question Answering
Longpre, S., Lu, Y., Tu, Z., & DuBois, C. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5829 · Cited by 40
“87 RelationExtraction (Levy et al., 2017) 79.”
Liu, J., Chen, Y., & Xu, J. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.214 · Cited by 61
“Motivated by previous works handling information extraction via machine reading comprehension (MRC) (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020; Du and Cardie, 2020b; Liu et al., 2020), we note implicit EAE may be more akin to MRC, as both of them are document-level tasks.”
BackgroundMethodPrototypical Representation Learning for Relation ExtractionPreprint
Ding, N., Wang, X., Fu, Y., Xu, G., Wang, R., Xie, P., Shen, Y., Huang, F., Zheng, H.-T., & Zhang, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.11647 · Cited by 64
“Further efforts pay attention to learning relations from the text in various specific scenarios, such as zero-few-shot scenarios (Levy et al., 2017; Han et al., 2018b; Gao et al., 2019; Soares et al., 2019; Ye & Ling, 2019) and open-domain scenarios (Banko et al., 2007; Fader et al., 2011; Mausam et…”
BackgroundDescription Based Text Classification with Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Chai, D., Wu, W., Han, Q., Wu, F. Q., & Li, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.03067 · Cited by 46
“Inspired by the current trend of formalizing NLP problems as question answering tasks (Levy et al., 2017; McCann et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019a,b; Gardner et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2019), we pro-pose a new framework for text classification by formalizing it as a SQuAD-style machine reading…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning Knowledge Bases with Parameters for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems
Madotto, A., Cahyawijaya, S., Winata, G. I., Xu, Y., Liu, Z., Lin, Z., & Fung, P. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.215 · Cited by 64
“, 2020) improved story generation by training a Language Model with knowledge triples converted into sentences using predefined templates (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodDomain-agnostic Question-Answering with Adversarial Training
Lee, S., Kim, D., & Park, J. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5826 · Cited by 40
“, 2017), RelationExtraction (RE) (Levy et al., 2017), and TextbookQA (TQ) (Kembhavi et al.”
MethodMulti-Task Retrieval for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks
Maillard, J., Karpukhin, V., Petroni, F., Yih, W.-T., Oğuz, B., Stoyanov, V., & Ghosh, G. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.89 · Cited by 67
“We note that the one exception is the Zero-shot RE task (Levy et al., 2017), a trivial task in which the query will always contain the title of the page to be retrieved.”
BackgroundMethods for Measuring, Updating, and Visualizing Factual Beliefs in Language Models
Hase, P., Diab, M., Çelikyılmaz, A., Li, X., Kozareva, Z., Stoyanov, V., Bansal, M., & Iyer, S. V. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.199 · Cited by 32
“(2) zsRE includes 151,631 questions based on relational knowledge from Wikipedia, which we randomly shuffle into train/dev/test splits with 80/10/10% of the data (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundLearning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge EditingPreprint
Jiang, Y.-X., Wang, Y.-F., Wu, C.-H., Zhong, W., Zeng, X., Gao, J.-H., Li, L.-Y., Jiang, X., Shang, L., Tang, R.-M., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11905 · Cited by 71
“However, due to the absence of out-of-scope instances in datasets like ZsRE and MQUAKE, we employ GPT-4 to generate corresponding queries and answers based on the edit descriptors, further details of which are provided in Appendix A.1.”
InfluentialReading the Manual: Event Extraction as Definition Comprehension
Chen, Y., Chen, T., Ebner, S., White, A. S., & Durme, B. V. (2020) · Workshop on Structured Prediction for NLP (SPNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.spnlp-1.9 · Cited by 68
“In (Levy et al. 2017), sets of crowdsourced paraphrastic questions are written for each relation type in the ontology.”
BackgroundTwenty-five years of information extraction
Grishman, R. (2019) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324919000512 · Cited by 70
Summarization as Indirect Supervision for Relation Extraction
Lu, K., Hsu, I.-H., Zhou, W., Ma, M. D., & Chen, M. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.09837 · Cited by 69
“Levy et al. (2017) show that RE can be addressed as answering reading comprehension questions and improved by the training process of a machine reading comprehensive task.”
BackgroundRebuilding ROME : Resolving Model Collapse during Sequential Model Editing
Gupta, A., Baskaran, S., & Anumanchipalli, G. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07175 · Cited by 67
“We then perform large scale editing of GPT2-XL (Radford (Levy et al., 2017).”
MethodEntQA: Entity Linking as Question AnsweringPreprint
Zhang, W., Hua, W., & Stratos, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.02369 · Cited by 40
“Interestingly, we find that we can fit the reader just relation type along with its first argument in KB completion (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019), an entity category in (nested) NER (Li et al., 2020), an auxiliary verb or a wh -expression in ellipsis resolution (Aralikatte et al., 2021), and…”
Deep Neural Approaches to Relation Triplets Extraction: a Comprehensive Survey
Nayak, T. K., Majumder, N., Goyal, P., & Poria, S. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09917-7 · Cited by 70
“[107] used the BiDAF model [109] with an additional NIL node in the output layer for this task on the WikiReading [42] dataset with additional negative samples.”
MethodGradient Imitation Reinforcement Learning for Low Resource Relation Extraction
Hu, X., Zhang, C., Yang, Y., Li, X., Li, L., Wen, L., & Yu, P. S. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.216 · Cited by 52
“Low resource Relation Extraction methods gained a lot of attention recently (Levy et al., 2017; Tarvainen and Valpola, 2017; Lin et al., 2019; Li and Qian, 2020; Hu et al., 2021, 2020), since these methods require fewer labeled data and deep neural networks could expand limited labeled information…”
MethodWhat does the Knowledge Neuron Thesis Have to do with Knowledge?
Niu, J., Liu, A., Zhu, Z., & Penn, G. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.02421 · Cited by 65
“CounterFact and ZsRE Meng et al. (2022) processed P ARA R EL relations differently from Dai et al. (2022).”
MethodA Review on Language Models as Knowledge Bases
AlKhamissi, B., Li, M., Celikyilmaz, A., Diab, M., & Ghazvininejad, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.06031 · Cited by 62
“To that end, several benchmarks have been proposed to measure consistency of LMs (Ravichander et al., 2020; Elazar et al., 2021), while other datasets have been adapted for that purpose (Levy et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021c).”
BackgroundStochastic RAG: End-to-End Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Expected Utility Maximization
Zamani, H., & Bendersky, M. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657923 · Cited by 41
“We use the Natural Questions (NQ) [19], TriviaQA [15], HotpotQA [50], FEVER [45], T-REx [7], zsRE [20], and Wizard of Wikipedia (WoW) [6] datasets from the KILT [29] benchmark.”
MethodSurvey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificity
Wang, C., Liu, X., Yue, Y., Tang, X., Zhang, T., Jiayang, C., Yao, Y., Gao, W., Hu, X., Qi, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.07521 · Cited by 61
“…et al., 2021), HOVER (Jiang et al., 2020), FEVEROUS (Aly et al., 2021) of the Fact Checking task, the T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018), zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and LAMA (Petroni et al., 2019a) to examine factual knowledge contained in pretrained language models, the WikiBio (Lebret et al.,…”
MethodZhao, W., Wang, S., Hu, Y., Zhao, Y., Qin, B., Zhang, X., Yang, Q. K., Xu, D., & Che, W. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.625 · Cited by 44
“…of Dialog (Wei et al., 2018; Cho and May, 2020; Aliannejadi et al., 2021), IE (Mausam et al., 2012; Zlabinger et al., 2020; Radev et al., 2020), QA (Levy et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018b; Min et al., 2020), Sum (Henderson et al., 2014; Syed et al., 2020; Hasan et al., 2021) and SA (Sheng and…”
BackgroundQuestion Answering is a Format; When is it Useful?Preprint
Gardner, M., Berant, J., Hajishirzi, H., Talmor, A., & Min, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11291 · Cited by 47
“This model transfer was successfully demonstrated by Levy et al. (2017), who took a relation extraction task and used templates to pose it as QA in order to transfer a SQuAD-trained model to the task.”
MethodModel-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Relation Classification with Limited Supervision
Obamuyide, A., & Vlachos, A. (2019) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1589 · Cited by 60
“For the problem of zero-shot extraction of relations, Rockt¨aschel et al. (2015); De-meester et al. (2016) proposed the use of logic rules, Levy et al. (2017) proposed to address the problem by formulating it as a reading comprehension challenge, while Obamuyide and Vlachos (2018) proposed to…”
MethodCorpusBrain: Pre-train a Generative Retrieval Model for Knowledge-Intensive Language Tasks
Chen, J., Zhang, R., Guo, J., Liu, Y., Fan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2022) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3511808.3557271 · Cited by 57
“26 2,284,168 5,000 5,000 zsRE [27] Slot Filling 1 147,909 3,724 4,966 NQ [24] Open Domain QA 1.”
BackgroundFeng, Z.-Y., Ma, W.-T., Yu, W., Huang, L., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X.-C., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.05876 · Cited by 57
“The current methods for editing knowledge mainly aim at incorporating triple-fact knowledge, which concentrate on question-answer (QA) tasks,i.e., ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017).”
Method500xCompressor: Generalized Prompt Compression for Large Language Models
Li, Z.-Q., Su, Y., & Collier, N. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.03094 · Cited by 56
“…to evaluate the compression models for various abilities: ArxivQA and SQuAD (Rajpurkar et al. 2016) for information extraction, RelationExtraction (Levy et al. 2017) for relation extraction, HotpotQA (Yang et al. 2018) for multi-hop reasoning, and RACE (Lai et al. 2017) for reading comprehension.”
A combined rule-based and machine learning approach for automated GDPR compliance checking
Hamdani, R. E., Mustapha, M., Amariles, D. R., Troussel, A., Meeùs, S., & Krasnashchok, K. (2021) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/3462757.3466081 · Cited by 67
“" T5 could predict new categories of data practices due to its language understanding capabilities that enable few and zero-shot inference [22, 50, 53].”
BackgroundLifelong Knowledge Editing for LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Continuous Prompt Learning
Chen, Q., Zhang, T.-L., He, X.-F., Li, D., Wang, C., Huang, L.-T., & Xue, H. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.03279 · Cited by 55
“However, the cumulative addition of extra parameters compromises the original inference process, evidenced by the pronounced deterioration in locality observed in ZSRE.”
InfluentialA Survey on Knowledge Editing of Neural Networks
Mazzia, V., Pedrani, A., Caciolai, A., Rottmann, K., & Bernardi, D. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2024.3498935 · Cited by 41
“As [17], they experiment their methodology only with NLP tasks using FEVER [24] and zsRE [22] datasets.”
InfluentialCan We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?
Zheng, C., Li, L., Dong, Q., Fan, Y., Wu, Z., Xu, J., & Chang, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.296 · Cited by 54
Can We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?
Zheng, C., Li, L., Dong, Q., Fan, Y., Wu, Z., Xu, J., & Chang, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.12740 · Cited by 54
“For BERT-style models, fact-checking dataset FEVER (Thorne et al., 2018) and question-answer dataset zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) are usally adopted.”
MethodSurvey on Factuality in Large Language Models
Wang, C., Liu, X., Yue, Y., Guo, Q., Hu, X., Tang, X., Zhang, T., Cheng, J., Yao, Y., Hu, X., et al. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3742420 · Cited by 359
“As LLMs become increasingly integrated into various applications, ranging from information retrieval to content generation, the accuracy of their outputs becomes paramount.”
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-023-11266-5 · Cited by 61
“Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) The aim of MRC models (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2020, 2019; McCann et al., 2018; Shen, Huang, Gao, & Chen, 2017) is to extract answer spans from a context through a given query. The task can be formulated as two classification problems: predicting the start and end positions of…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTextual Entailment for Event Argument Extraction: Zero- and Few-Shot with Multi-Source LearningPreprint
Sainz, O., Gonzalez-Dios, I., de Lacalle, O. L., Min, B., & Agirre, E. (2022) · NAACL-HLT · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01376 · Cited by 54
“Other semantic tasks such as Named Entity Recognition, Relation Extraction and Semantic Role Labelling have also been reformulated as entailment by automatically converting data into the entailment format (White et al., 2017; Poliak et al., 2018a; Levy et al., 2017; Sainz et al., 2021).”
MethodSelective Forgetting: Advancing Machine Unlearning Techniques and Evaluation in Language ModelsPreprint
Wang, L.-Z., Zeng, X., Guo, J.-S., Wong, K.-F., & Gottlob, G. (2024) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.05813 · Cited by 53
Revisiting Few-shot Relation Classification: Evaluation Data and Classification Schemes
Sabo, O., Elazar, Y., Goldberg, Y., & Dagan, I. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00392 · Cited by 38
Memory-Based Model Editing at Scale
Mitchell, E., Lin, C., Bosselut, A., Manning, C. D., & Finn, C. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.06520 · Cited by 51
“To produce the dataset, we first gather a list of 15,000 non-numeric entities from zsRE (Levy et al., 2017; De Cao et al., 2021) and 989 noun phrases from GPT-3 (Brown et al., 2020) (e.g., GHOST HUNTING ) for a total of 15,989 topics.”
MethodFiD-Light: Efficient and Effective Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation
Hofstätter, S., Chen, J., Raman, K., & Zamani, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591687 · Cited by 51
“…experiments on 7 KILT tasks: HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), Natural Questions (NQ) (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018), Zero Shot RE (zsRE) (Levy et al., 2017), FEVER (Thorne et al., 2018), and Wizard of Wikipedia (WoW) (Dinan et al., 2018).”
MethodHeterogeneous graph neural networks for noisy few-shot relation classification
Xie, Y., Xu, H., Jiao-e, L., Yang, C., & Gao, K. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105548 · Cited by 54
Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language Models
Jang, J., Ye, S., Yang, S., Shin, J., Han, J., Kim, G., Choi, S. J., & Seo, M. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03215 · Cited by 49
“Experimental Result We first focus on the performance on zero-shot Relation Extraction (zsRE), which is measured on the dev set of 12 relations that are ensured to have no overlap with the 84 relations of the train set (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAKEW: Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild
Wu, X., Pan, L., Wang, W. Y., & Luu, A. T. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.843 · Cited by 25
“In detail, they typically derive structured facts as knowledge updates from meticulously crafted datasets (Vrandeˇci´c and Krötzsch, 2014; Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSun, Q., Huang, K., Yang, X., Tong, R., Zhang, K., & Poria, S. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645678 · Cited by 42
“In sentence-level synthetic data, there exists merely one relation triplet within a sentence.”
BackgroundMethodWeikum, G. (2021) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3476311.3476393 · Cited by 25
“…relation-specific patterns or generic hyper-patterns (i.e., templates for patterns) for cloze questions (or, equivalently, basic Who/Where/When questions), relation extraction can be cast into masked-word predictions over an LM, leveraging neural learning for machine reading comprehension [15].”
BackgroundU-Net: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable QuestionsPreprint
Sun, F., Li, L., Qiu, X., & Liu, Y. (2018) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.06638 · Cited by 49
“One approach is to directly extend previous MRC models by introducing a no-answer score to the score vector of the answer span (Levy et al. 2017; Clark and Gardner 2017).”
Modifying Memories in Transformer Models
Zhu, C., Rawat, A. S., Zaheer, M., Bhojanapalli, S., Li, D., Yu, F., & Kumar, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.00363 · Cited by 48
“We construct the benchmark of modified facts from two datasets, T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018) and Zero-shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) (Levy et al., 2017).”
MethodMuon Outperforms Adam in Tail-End Associative Memory LearningPreprint
Wang, S., Zhang, F., Li, J., Du, C., Du, C., Pang, T., Yang, Z., Hong, M., & Tan, V. Y. F. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.26030 · Cited by 46
“We evaluate knowledge items from two widely used datasets: Counterfact (Meng et al., 2022a) and ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017).”
Hindsight: Posterior-guided training of retrievers for improved open-ended generationPreprint
Paranjape, A., Khattab, O., Potts, C., Zaharia, M., & Manning, C. D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07752 · Cited by 30
“…problems, where the query itself has high overlap with the relevant passage and there is a unique answer, for example factoid Open-domain QA such as Natural Questions (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), HotPotQA (Yang et al., 2018), fact-checking (Thorne et al., 2018), and slot-filling (Levy et al., 2017).”
Backgroundpair2vec: Compositional Word-Pair Embeddings for Cross-Sentence Inference
Joshi, M., Choi, E., Levy, O., Weld, D. S., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1362 · Cited by 50
Self-citationFrisoni, G., Moro, G., & Carbonaro, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3130956 · Cited by 76
“Despite the greater naturalness and diversity than past RE solutions [62], [284], their question generation module was based on templates obtained via context-independent rule-based strategies.”
BackgroundLogic-guided Semantic Representation Learning for Zero-Shot Relation Classification
Li, J., Wang, R., Zhang, N., Zhang, W., Yang, F., & Chen, H. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.265 · Cited by 40
“Zero-shot relation classification (ZSRC) was first proposed by (Levy et al., 2017), which is able to extract new relations by reducing relation classification to answering simple reading comprehension questions.”
Learning from Language Description: Low-shot Named Entity Recognition via Decomposed Framework
Wang, Y., Chu, H., Zhang, C., & Gao, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.139 · Cited by 45
“Other zero-shot problems studied in NLP involve text classification (Yin et al., 2019), entity typing (Zhou et al., 2018), word sense disambiguation (Kumar et al., 2019) and relation extraction (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundLocate-then-edit for Multi-hop Factual Recall under Knowledge EditingPreprint
Zhang, Z., Li, Y., Kan, Z., Cheng, K., Hu, L., & Wang, D. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06331 · Cited by 36
“…weights in a range of layers; MeLLo , which manages multi-hop knowledge editing by decomposing subproblems and detecting conflicts; PMET , which optimizes FFN hidden states for precise weight updates, achieving SOTA performance in COUNTERFACT (Meng et al., 2022a) and ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundEvaluating the Reversal Curse in Model EditingPreprint
Xu, H.-X., Ma, J.-Y., Ling, Z.-H., Liu, Q., Liu, C., & Gu, J.-C. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.10322 · Cited by 37
“The ZsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and CounterFact (Meng et al., 2022) datasets are primarily utilized to assess whether edited models can recall the newly injected facts, as depicted in Figure 1(a).”
Think Before You Speak: Explicitly Generating Implicit Commonsense Knowledge for Response Generation
Zhou, P., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hedayatnia, B., Kim, S., Pujara, J., Ren, X., Liu, Y., & Hakkani-Tür, D. Z. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.88 · Cited by 26
“Map Relations to Natural Language (NL) To convert ConceptNet triples into NL, we follow a common practice and map every relation r in the triple to its NL template, and fill in s and o in the template (Levy et al., 2017).”
MethodReinforced Lifelong Editing for Language ModelsPreprint
Li, Z., Jiang, H., Chen, H., Bi, B., Zhou, Z., Sun, F., Fang, J., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.05759 · Cited by 21
“Tests were conducted on 3 LLMs using ZsRE dataset under 20 × 100 configuration while keeping all other variables constant (such as the number of LLM editing layers) to ensure fair comparison.”
InfluentialXu, S., Pang, L., Yu, M., Meng, F.-D., Shen, H.-W., Cheng, X.-Q., & Zhou, J. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.18150 · Cited by 43
“We use two knowledge-intensive datasets including Zero Shot RE (Levy et al., 2017) (ZS) and T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018).”
MethodPerturbation-Restrained Sequential Model Editing
Ma, J.-J., Wang, H., Xu, H.-Y., Ling, Z.-H., & Gu, J.-C. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.16821 · Cited by 42
“Two popular model editing datasets Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (Z S RE) [33] and C OUNTER -”
MethodRobust Retrieval Augmented Generation for Zero-shot Slot Filling
Glass, M., Rossiello, G., Chowdhury, M. F. M., & Gliozzo, A. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.148 · Cited by 25
“In particular, the KILT benchmark (Petroni et al., 2020b), standardizes two zero-shot slot filling tasks, zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018), providing a competitive evaluation framework to drive advancements in slot filling.”
BackgroundVLKEB: A Large Vision-Language Model Knowledge Editing Benchmark
Huang, H., Zhong, H., Yu, T., Liu, Q., Wu, S., Wang, L., & Tan, T.-P. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/079017-0294 · Cited by 41
“LLM Editing Benchmarks The widely used datasets for LLM editing are ZsRE [16] and COUN-TERFACT [3].”
MethodPre-training to Match for Unified Low-shot Relation Extraction
Liu, F., Lin, H.-Y., Han, X.-P., Cao, B., & Sun, L. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.12274 · Cited by 41
“There are two mainstream learning paradigms widely explored in low-shot relation extraction, namely zeroshot RE (Levy et al., 2017) and few-shot RE (Han et al.”
Influential"A Passage to India": Pre-trained Word Embeddings for Indian LanguagesPreprint
Kumar, S., Saunack, K., Kanojia, D., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.13800 · Cited by 29
“These cross-lingual word embeddings have shown to help the task of cross-lingual information extraction (Levy et al., 2017), False Friends and Cognate detection (Merlo and Ro-driguez, 2019), and Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation (Artetxe et al., 2018b).”
BackgroundRE-Matching: A Fine-Grained Semantic Matching Method for Zero-Shot Relation Extraction
Zhao, J., Zhan, W., Zhao, X., Zhang, Q., Gui, T., Wei, Z.-Y., Wang, J.-Z., Peng, M.-L., & Sun, M. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.04954 · Cited by 40
“ESIM (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundGive Me the Facts! A Survey on Factual Knowledge Probing in Pre-trained Language Models
Youssef, P., Koras, O. A., Li, M.-J., Schlotterer, J., & Seifert, C. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.16570 · Cited by 39
Open-world Story Generation with Structured Knowledge Enhancement: A Comprehensive SurveyPreprint
Wang, Y., Lin, J., Yu, Z., Hu, W. P., & Karlsson, B. F. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.04634 · Cited by 8
“Levy et al. [93] provide a pre-defined set that maps each relational type R ( x, y ) in knowledge data to at least one readable natural language sentence.”
BackgroundAsking It All: Generating Contextualized Questions for any Semantic Role
Pyatkin, V., Roit, P., Michael, J., Goldberg, Y., Tsarfaty, R., & Dagan, I. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.108 · Cited by 28
“As a result, previous work has found ways to align existing relation ontologies with questions, either through human curation (Levy et al., 2017) — which limits the approach to very small ontologies — or with a small set of fixed question templates (Du and Cardie, 2020) — which relies heavily on…”
BackgroundInfluentialKaushik, D., Kiela, D., Lipton, Z. C., & Yih, W.-T. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.517 · Cited by 30
“, 2018), RelationExtraction (Levy et al., 2017), RACE (Lai et al.”
Meta In-Context Learning Makes Large Language Models Better Zero and Few-Shot Relation Extractors
Li, G., Wang, P., Liu, J., Guo, Y., Ji, K., Shang, Z.-Y., & Xu, Z. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.17807 · Cited by 38
“To be capable of extracting relations that were not specified in advance, zero-shot relation extraction [ Levy et al. , 2017; Chen and Li, 2021; Chia et al. , 2022 ] is proposed to invent new models to predict new relations.”
MethodEditing Common Sense in Transformers
Gupta, A., Mondal, D., Sheshadri, A. K., Zhao, W., Li, X., Wiegreffe, S., & Tandon, N. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.511 · Cited by 29
“The MEMIT (Mass Editing Memory in a Trans-former) method proposed by Meng et al. (2023) demonstrates its effectiveness in editing up to 10,000 factual associations in transformer models on zsRE (Levy et al., 2017) and their proposed COUNTERFACT dataset, designed to test factual recall.”
MethodUnified Semantic Typing with Meaningful Label Inference
Huang, J. Y., Li, B.-Z., Xu, J., & Chen, M. (2022) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01826 · Cited by 38
“…idea, semantic typing tasks have been reformulated as prompt-based learning (Ding et al., 2021; Han et al., 2021), natural language inference (Yin et al., 2019; Sainz et al., 2021), question answering (Levy et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Du and Cardie, 2020), and translation (Paolini et al., 2021).”
BackgroundLearning to Generate Task-Specific Adapters from Task Description
Ye, Q., & Ren, X. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.82 · Cited by 26
“Several works study cross-task transfer by unifying the inputoutput format, e.g., relation extraction as machine reading comprehension (Levy et al., 2017), named entity recognition as machine reading comprehension (Li et al., 2020).”
BackgroundRead before Generate! Faithful Long Form Question Answering with Machine Reading
Su, D., Li, X., Zhang, J., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., & Fung, P. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.00343 · Cited by 37
“…data in KILT benchmark (Petroni et al., 2021), including TrivaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), kwiatkowski2019naturaluestion (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), HotpotQA (Yang et al., 2018), Fever (Thorne et al., 2018), zsRE (Levy et al., 2017), AY2, T-REx (Elsahar et al., 2018b) and WoW (Dinan et al., 2018).”
Salemi, A., & Zamani, H. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657733 · Cited by 35
“One dataset is used for fact verification, called FEVER [46], and finally, two slot-filling datasets for relation extraction are used in our experiments; zsRE [23] and T-REx [9].”
MethodPQuAD: A Persian question answering dataset
Darvishi, K., Shahbodaghkhan, N., Abbasiantaeb, Z., & Momtazi, S. (2023) · Computer Speech & Language · doi:10.1016/j.csl.2023.101486 · Cited by 22
“We have evaluated PQuAD using two pre-trained transformer-based language models, namely ParsBERT (Farahani et al., 2021) and XLM-RoBERTa (Conneau et al., 2020), as well as BiDAF (Levy et al., 2017) which is an attention-based model proposed for MRC. Model EM F1 HasAns EM HasAns F1 NoAns EM/F1 BNA 54.4 71.4 43.9 66.4 8…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExplainable zero-shot learning via attentive graph convolutional network and knowledge graphs
Geng, Y., Chen, J., Ye, Z., Yuan, Z., Zhang, W., & Chen, H. (2021) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-210435 · Cited by 31
“There are also some ZSL methods for dealing with the training sample shortage problem in other domains, such as Natural Language Processing (NLP) including text classification [19–21], entity linking [22, 23], relation extraction [24] and machine translation [25].”
MethodAging with GRACE: Lifelong Model Editing with Discrete Key-Value Adaptors
Hartvigsen, T., Sankaranarayanan, S., Palangi, H., Kim, Y., & Ghassemi, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.11031 · Cited by 35
“We extract potential edits from the validation set of zsRE [24], following the editing literature [16, 30].”
Wang, F., Bao, R.-X., Wang, S.-H., Yu, W.-C., Liu, Y.-C., Cheng, W., & Chen, H.-F. (2024) · VLDB Workshops · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11441 · Cited by 35
“We conduct experiments on two Wikipedia-sourced datasets used in Model Editing (ME) meth-ods: the Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (zsRE) dataset (Levy et al., 2017) and the T-REx dataset (Elsahar et al., 2018).”
CorpusLM: Towards a Unified Language Model on Corpus for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks
Li, X., Dou, Z., Zhou, Y., & Liu, F. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657778 · Cited by 24
“[14] Entity Linking - 3,396 WNED-CWEB [14] Entity Linking - 5,599 T-REx [12] Slot Filling 2,284,168 5,000 Zero Shot RE [25] Slot Filling 147,909 3,724 Natural Questions [24] Open Domain QA 87,372 2,837 HotpotQA [58] Open Domain QA 88,869 5,600 TriviaQA [21] Open Domain QA 61,844 5,359 ELI5 [13]…”
BackgroundAging with grace: Lifelong model editing with discrete key-value adaptors
Hartvigsen, T., Sankaranarayanan, S., Palangi, H., Kim, Y., & Ghassemi, M. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2079 · Cited by 35
“The T5 model was pretrained on the Natural Questions dataset (NQ) [19], and we simulate deployment on the zsRE dataset [20] extracting potential edits from [15]’s validation split.”
Clinical concept and relation extraction using prompt-based machine reading comprehension
Cheng, P., Yang, X., Yu, Z., Bian, J., Hogan, W. R., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad107 · Cited by 37
“Levy et al. [46] showed that relation extraction can be approached by asking MRC models to answer simple questions instead of classifications.”
MethodEnhanced Language Representation with Label Knowledge for Span Extraction
Yang, P., Cong, X., Sun, Z., & Liu, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.379 · Cited by 32
Halterman, A., Keith, K. A., Sarwar, S. M., & O’Connor, B. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.371 · Cited by 20
“…Aguilar et al., 2014) which are limited by their pre-defined schemas, to directly using natural language to encode semantic arguments ( QA-SRL ; He et al. 2015; Stanovsky et al. 2016; FitzGerald et al. 2018; Roit et al. 2020) and events (Levy et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2020; Du and Cardie, 2020).”
Learning to Ask Unanswerable Questions for Machine Reading Comprehension
Zhu, H., Dong, L., Wei, F., Wang, W., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1415 · Cited by 48
“Based on BiDAF, Levy et al. (2017) propose the BiDAF-No-Answer model to predict the distribution of answer candidates and the probability of a question being unan-swerable at the same time.”
MethodRead before Generate! Faithful Long Form Question Answering with Machine Reading
Su, D., Li, X., Zhang, J., Shang, L., Jiang, X., Liu, Q., & Fung, P. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.61 · Cited by 37
Hase, P., Bansal, M., Kim, B., & Ghandeharioun, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04213 · Cited by 33
“ZSRE Dataset.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialUnleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Zero-shot Relation Extraction via Self-Prompting
Liu, S.-Y., Li, Y., Li, J., Yang, S., & Lan, Y. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.01154 · Cited by 33
DocTER: Evaluating document-based knowledge editing
Wu, S., Wang, A., Peng, M., Lin, Y., Li, W., Sun, M., & Su, J. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104299 · Cited by 34
“Evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge editing and constructing corresponding datasets is also a research hotspot (Thorne, Vlachos, Christodoulopoulos and Mittal, 2018; Levy et al., 2017; Meng et al., 2022; Onoe et al., 2023; Zhong et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024).”
Raza, S., & Schwartz, B. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02117-3 · Cited by 35
“Taking inspiration from recent NLP works on RE [27, 69], we employ zero-shot learning (ZSL) [26] to infer relations from the texts.”
BackgroundMethodA Consistent Dual-MRC Framework for Emotion-cause Pair Extraction
Cheng, Z.-F., Jiang, Z., Yin, Y., Wang, C., Ge, S., & Gu, Q. (2022) · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. · doi:10.1145/3558548 · Cited by 33
“[27] transformed the relation extraction into a MRC problem in zero-shot setting and achieved improvement.”
Exploring Low-dimensional Intrinsic Task Subspace via Prompt Tuning
Qin, Y., Wang, X., Su, Y., Lin, Y.-K., Ding, N., Liu, Z.-Y., Li, J.-Z., Hou, L., Li, P., Sun, M., et al. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.07867 · Cited by 40
Contextualized Sparse Representations for Real-Time Open-Domain Question Answering
Lee, J., Seo, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Kang, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.85 · Cited by 34
“uestion representation h0, following Seo et al. (2019). Note the difference, however, that we concatenate the negative example instead of considering it as an independent example with noanswer option Levy et al. (2017). During training, we find that adding tf-idf matching scores on the word-level logits of the negative…”
BackgroundSelf-citationA Unified Generative Retriever for Knowledge-Intensive Language Tasks via Prompt Learning
Chen, J., Zhang, R., Guo, J., de Rijke, M., Liu, Y., Fan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3539618.3591631 · Cited by 32
“Knowledge-intensive language tasks (KILTs), such as fact checking [41] and slot filling [27], have gained much attention in recent years.”
BackgroundHyperdecoders: Instance-specific decoders for multi-task NLP
Ivison, H., & Peters, M. E. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.08304 · Cited by 32
“, 2017), RelationExtraction (Levy et al., 2017), TextbookQA (Kembhavi et al.”
MethodContextualized Representations Using Textual Encyclopedic KnowledgePreprint
Joshi, M., Lee, K., Luan, Y., & Toutanova, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.12006 · Cited by 31
“The out-of-domain set we evaluate on has examples from BioASQ (Tsatsaronis et al., 2015), DROP (Dua et al., 2019), DuoRC (Saha et al., 2018), RACE (Lai et al., 2017), RelationExtraction (Levy et al., 2017), and TextbookQA (Kembhavi et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017)
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 333-342
- OpenAlex
- W2624677889
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
- Nvidia
- Tencent
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review