Cited by 148Authorship Attribution and ProfilingTopic ModelingNatural Language Processing Techniques

Demographic Factors Improve Classification Performance

Open access
Hovy, Dirk·2015·Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)

Abstract

Extra-linguistic factors influence language use, and are accounted for by speakers and listeners.Most natural language processing (NLP) tasks to date, however, treat language as uniform.This assumption can harm performance.We investigate the effect of including demographic information on performance in a variety of text-classification tasks.We find that by including age or gender information, we consistently and significantly improve performance over demographic-agnostic models.These results hold across three text-classification tasks in five languages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/p15-1073

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. David Bamman, Jacob Eisenstein, and Tyler Schnoe- belen. 2014b. Gender identity and lexical varia- tion in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2):135-160.
  2. Federica Barbieri. 2008. Patterns of age-based lin- guistic variation in American English. Journal of sociolinguistics, 12(1):58-88.
  3. Morgane Ciot, Morgan Sonderegger, and Derek Ruths. 2013. Gender inference of twitter users in non- english contexts. In Proceedings of the 2013 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, Wash, pages 18-21.
  4. Jacob Eisenstein. to appear. Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics.
  5. Janet Holmes. 2013. An introduction to sociolinguis- tics. Routledge.
  6. Dirk Hovy, Barbara Plank, Héctor Martínez Alonso, and Anders Søgaard. 2015b. Mining for unambigu- ous instances to adapt pos taggers to new domains. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT.
  7. Lesley Milroy and James Milroy. 1992. Social net- work and social class: Toward an integrated soci- olinguistic model. Language in society, 21(01):1- 26.
  8. Dong Nguyen, Dolf Trieschnigg, A. Seza Dogruöz, Ri- lana Gravel, Mariet Theune, Theo Meder, and Fran- ciska De Jong. 2014. Predicting Author Gender and Age from Tweets: Sociolinguistic Theories and Crowd Wisdom. In Proceedings of COLING 2014.
  9. Duyu Tang, Furu Wei, Nan Yang, Ming Zhou, Ting Liu, and Bing Qin. 2014. Learning sentiment- specific word embedding for twitter sentiment clas- sification. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics, pages 1555-1565.
  10. Martijn Wieling, John Nerbonne, and R Harald Baayen. 2011. Quantitative social dialectology: Ex- plaining linguistic variation geographically and so- cially. PloS one, 6(9):e23613.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hovy, D.
Corresponding author
Hovy, Dirk
Venue
Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Published
2015
Pages
752-762
OpenAlex
W2252241921
Cited by
148
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
9.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
demographic data, text classification, age, gender, language variation, extralinguistic factors, language use, cross-linguistic comparison, demographic bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review