Cited by 13Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareMedical Coding and Health Information

Learning Patient Representations from Text

Open access
Dligach, Dmitriy, Miller, Timothy·2018·Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics

Abstract

Mining electronic health records for patients who satisfy a set of predefined criteria is known in medical informatics as phenotyping.Phenotyping has numerous applications such as outcome prediction, clinical trial recruitment, and retrospective studies.Supervised machine learning for phenotyping typically relies on sparse patient representations such as bag-of-words.We consider an alternative that involves learning patient representations.We develop a neural network model for learning patient representations and show that the learned representations are general enough to obtain state-of-the-art performance on a standard comorbidity detection task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/s18-2014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For both structured codes and unstructured notes, standardized vocabularies including FHIR and UMLS CUIs are introduced to transfer raw tokens into unique phrases to reduce sparsity.

    “For both structured codes and unstructured notes, standardized vocabularies including FHIR [6] and UMLS CUIs [62,63] are introduced to transfer raw tokens into unique phrases to reduce the sparsity of the input data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Andy Schuetz, Walter F Stewart, and Jimeng Sun. 2016. Doctor ai: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks. In Machine Learning for Health- care Conference. pages 301-318.
  2. Mohit Iyyer, Varun Manjunatha, Jordan Boyd-Graber, and Hal Daumé III. 2015. Deep unordered com- position rivals syntactic methods for text classifica- tion. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). vol- ume 1, pages 1681-1691.
  3. ZC Lipton, David Kale, Charles Elkan, and Randall Wetzel. 2016. Learning to Diagnose with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networks. In Proceedings of ICLR 2016. San Juan, Puerto Rico.
  4. Tomas Mikolov, Wen-tau Yih, and Geoffrey Zweig. 2013b. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In hlt-Naacl. volume 13, pages 746-751.
  5. Timothy Miller, Dmitriy Dligach, and Guergana Savova. 2016. Unsupervised document classifica- tion with informed topic models. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing. pages 83-91.
  6. Illés Solt, Domonkos Tikk, Viktor Gál, and Zsolt T Kardkovács. 2009. Semantic classification of dis- eases in discharge summaries using a context-aware rule-based classifier. Journal of the American Med- ical Informatics Association 16(4):580-584.
  7. Özlem Uzuner. 2009. Recognizing obesity and co- morbidities in sparse data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16(4):561-570.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dligach, D., & Miller, T.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Seventh Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics
Published
2018
Pages
119-123
OpenAlex
W2799774807
Cited by
13
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM114355)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
patient representation learning, phenotyping, electronic health records, comorbidity detection, artificial neural networks, clinical text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review